Letters to the Editor - The Lakeville Journal - 3-31-22

Why does Russia want Ukraine?

Why does Russia want (or better-said, need) Ukraine? Well, the answer to this question, my American friends, couldn’t be simpler: natural resources and influence.

Not only are the natural resources essential for every society for these economic and technological prospects, but they are also a mighty tool in international affairs.

Let’s start with the main hero in this story. Ukraine is the European top producer of wheat, the world’s leading producer of sunflower oil, and the 4th largest producer of corn. It is this that has earned Ukraine the nickname ‘the breadbasket of Europe’ and it has the potential and ability to provide food for more than half a billion people. Even China a few years ago purchased about three million hectares of fertile land from Ukraine to satisfy its growing agricultural demands.

Furthermore, Ukraine is a massive producer of iron, titanium, timber, nickel, magnesium, salt, sulfur. Ukraine holds 37,892 million tons of proven coal reserves ranking seventh in the world and accounting for about 3% of the world’s total coal reserves of 1,139,471 million tons. The coal mines in Ukraine are among the deepest in Europe.

Before this invasion, Russia was the second largest producer of natural gas (second behind the USA) and the major natural gas supplier to the European continent. Every single country on the European continent is heavily dependent on this resource. But that was not enough for Russia, now they are after the “middle man” in this transaction.

Ukraine is not a big producer of natural gas and oil in Europe such as Russia and Norway, but they are the main “transit country” that connects the supply (Russia) and demand (European countries). The largest European pipeline called “Druzhba” (“Friendship”) is a pipeline about 420 miles long that connects the Russian natural gas coming from Siberia and through Ukraine, then connects with the other European countries. The second-largest pipeline called “Soyuz” (“Union”) also from Russia runs through Ukraine and brings an additional amount of natural gas to Europe. We are talking about a massive network of pipelines all around the Ukraine that brings energy to Europe. Yes, there are other pipelines such as “Nord Stream” and “Yamal” but the two that go to Ukraine are the two vital ones.

The end game for this war and the two things that the Kremlin wants to achieve are two simple things. More control over natural resources and a new perception of Russia. They wanted to be seen as one of the top three world superpowers (together with the USA and China). They want a new “Yalta Conference” where the spheres of influence among the countries once again are divided. In other words, they want a new 21st-century version of the old Soviet Union.

Dalibor Anchevski

West Cornwall

Formerly Macedonia

 

Less vitriol, more virtue, please

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I get that. But unsubstantiated opinions that echo the latest biased sound bite from someone’s favorite media outlet aren’t helpful. Let’s look at some recent statements made in letters to The Lakeville Journal editor.

Quoted from The Lakeville Journal March 24: “Continually harping on Trump today is another liberal ploy.  It deflects from the left’s crimes and from Biden’s colossal blunders on; the border, inflation, energy, Afghanistan and the rest.”

Are the colossal blunders on the border all Biden’s fault?  There is plenty of blame to be shared by the current and prior administrations (Source: Pewresearch.org).

Inflation? Economists cite six factors that contribute to inflation. Only one is attributed to policies and regulations. Let’s face it, inflation is complicated. Blaming inflation on only one out six factors may not be accurate (Source: businessinsider.com).

High energy prices? The main culprit for current oil prices is slashed shale production meeting rebounding demand, and of course, a war waged by a country that produces 10% of the world’s barrels (Source: Barron’s March 7, 2022).

Afghanistan? Twenty years, a cost of $2 trillion, and countless lives lost. Plenty of people to blame for this fiasco.

Quoted from The Lakeville Journal of March 17: “The socialist agenda has contributed to higher prices for housing;  artificially low interest rates; a huge increase in government entitlements have pushed inflation beyond our wildest dreams.”

Robust housing demand and more stagnant housing supply are both part of the explanation for the rapid house price inflation. Low interest rates during this period have made housing more affordable since this lowers the mortgage interest cost (Source: econofact.com).

Real interest rates have been negative for 17 out of the last 20 years (Source: longtermtrends.net).

Inflation exceeded 8.9% from 1978 through 1981. A lot of us are old enough to remember it. You know what?  We survived. The three major Federal Entitlement programs as a percentage of GDP, Social Security (5.2%), Medicare (3.2%), and Medicaid (2.4%),  have changed very little in the past three years. Other mandatory entitlements, as a percentage of GDP, are budgeted to decline in Fiscal Year 2022.  (Source: U.S. Government Budget for 2022).

Food for thought:

If you own a home, maybe inflation is your friend.

If you have a mortgage or a car loan, those low interest rates have really helped you.

However, if you’re retired, the interest income you can earn on safe investments sucks.

Without immigration maybe inflation in many serviced-based sectors and housing costs would be even higher.

You could have hedged yourself against high gas prices by buying oil company stocks (most have more than doubled in the past year).  Or you could drive an EV.

How do we have a better dialogue? Maybe no lefty, righty, liberal, conservative, socialist labels for a start. How about less vitriol and more virtue in our conversations?

Joe Geraghty

Lakeville

 

On the ‘forgotten’ Ninth Amendment

Bennett B. Patterson’s The Forgotten Ninth Amendment (1955), contains many clear affirmations that the Ninth Amendment is “the most significant and forceful clause in the entire Constitution”, “a declaration of the sovereignty and dignity of the individual.” and “it is in fact the cornerstone of the Constitution.” These three claims are from page one; 84 pages follow.                                                                                                                              

The recent Senate hearings  on nominee Jackson may pivot on disagreements over the Ninth Amendment. As I heard bits and pieces of the 20-plus hours of questioning, the Ninth Amendment came up a lot of times, mainly from the mouths of worried Republicans. Many well argued paragraphs, indeed many articles and books need to be written about why this is so very important for women and reproductive rights as well as rights to clean air, unpolluted water, unpoisoned top soil.  I will simply list here a few facts, writings, leads, that need following up by many citizens, lawyers and politicians.

Biden believes in the rights/powers of 9A because it helped him block the appointment of Bork to the Supreme Court way back when. Biden, and many others, are not fully aware of all the “other unenumerated rights” that exist now and that may emerge in the future.

See “Joe Biden’s Secret Constitutional Weapon” by Ian Ward in politico, 2/23/22.  Ward seems unaware of Bennett B. Patterson’s book, and Lynn Hunt’s.

See Lynn Hunt’s book Inventing Human Rights: A History that shows how human rights emerge as they are being lost, or as people become aware that practices like torture are morally wrong even if both church and state approve of them, as they did in France, early 1600s.

See Article One (out of 30) “Right to Equality” in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948): “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act toward one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”  And sisterhood . . . . (and in the spirit of extended family values I’d say).

The Ninth Amendment also protects the 16-plus rights listed on page 20 of EMERGENT by C Keil (2022 and just $8 at Lulu Press) I picked up some of those “rights” from a footnote in Randy Barnett’s edited book The Rights Retained by the People which also contains the very valuable Appendix C. “Justice Goldberg’s Concurring Opinion” in Griswold v. Connecticut. Griswold is about a key right to contraception case leading to Roe V. Wade and the rights of women and men to privacy and to control over their own bodies.

Charles Keil

Lakeville

 

U.S. Senate Supreme Court hearing on the ropes

“Jessie Ventura took American politics and raised it to the level of professional wrestling.”

— Argus Hamilton

World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), spawned in 1980, has by 2022 become a worldwide billion viewer a week cable offering. Professional wrestling isn’t really considered a sport, it is entertainment with a puny fan base compared to real sports: football, basketball and baseball as well as golf, tennis, soccer. Professional wrestlers are physical specimens, they self-comment on their acting abilities and success predicated on individual specialty stunts — in the ring, off the ropes —  conducting a scripted match, fake, contrived.   There are 207 WWE super stars.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has 22 members, an even split of GOP and Democrats. If one is to judge by this past week’s confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson the Judiciary Committee would be rated more entertainment than serious governmental oversight, advise & consent for the U.S. Justice System. Judge Brown Jackson has been confirmed by this committee twice, her qualifications are exemplary, incidentally she is the first Black woman to be nominated for Justice to the Supreme Court. Jackson’s record of sentencing is no softer, no less reflective of judgement than a large number of judgeship candidates confirmed by the Judiciary Committee now holding for-life court appointments.  There are far too many confirmed judges having similar and/or softer verdict profiles to list.

Far be it from Cotton, Cruz, Lee, Hawley, Graham, and Blackburn to fulfill their Senate responsibilities to conduct question and answer discussions with SCOTUS candidate Judge Brown Jackson regarding her judicial philosophy.  Rather, these Senators formed their own WWE — White Wannabe Elected U.S. President — contenders utilizing their 30 minutes of free media rich exposure to propel themselves, in the ring and off the ropes, on what they deem hot, near-term political issues. This WWE cadre strutted with or without props, asking questions not listening for answers, interrupting, formulating their own responses. In this contention, Jackson was more at ringside, an observer, than involved in the discussions. An analysis of Jackson’s percentage air time for response compared to the GOP six inquisitors’ commentary would be illuminating.

For me it seems that Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina passed along with his friend and constant colleague, Senator John McCain. Since 2018, Graham has become Trump’s fast flunkey — double speak, criticize then retract kissing the ground, stomp out of a hearing.

I am in favor of Judge Brown Jackson’s appointment to the Supreme Court.  I am dismayed how the GOP including Mitch McConnell has behaved in these proceedings — McConnell who stole two Democratic opportunities for SCOTUS appointments in 2015 and again in 2020. Shameful senators at work.

“I forgot what it felt like to have the top of my foot hurt so bad from kicking people in the face, but it’s a small price to pay for victory ...”

Randy Orton, WWE Star Wrestler

Kathy Herald-Marlowe

Sharon

Latest News

Love is in the atmosphere

Author Anne Lamott

Sam Lamott

On Tuesday, April 9, The Bardavon 1869 Opera House in Poughkeepsie was the setting for a talk between Elizabeth Lesser and Anne Lamott, with the focus on Lamott’s newest book, “Somehow: Thoughts on Love.”

A best-selling novelist, Lamott shared her thoughts about the book, about life’s learning experiences, as well as laughs with the audience. Lesser, an author and co-founder of the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, interviewed Lamott in a conversation-like setting that allowed watchers to feel as if they were chatting with her over a coffee table.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reading between the lines in historic samplers

Alexandra Peter's collection of historic samplers includes items from the family of "The House of the Seven Gables" author Nathaniel Hawthorne.

Cynthia Hochswender

The home in Sharon that Alexandra Peters and her husband, Fred, have owned for the past 20 years feels like a mini museum. As you walk through the downstairs rooms, you’ll see dozens of examples from her needlework sampler collection. Some are simple and crude, others are sophisticated and complex. Some are framed, some lie loose on the dining table.

Many of them have museum cards, explaining where those samplers came from and why they are important.

Keep ReadingShow less