Budget Scorecard: Accounting for County Taxes


A survey of county budgets, by far the largest source of local government taxes levied on New York residents, highlights a few counties for their fiscal discipline, singles out others with especially high taxes and invites more in-depth comparisons on spending for specific programs.

Overall, tax revenues in 22 counties located in and around the Hudson Valley grew by 40 percent from 1999 to 2004 to $680 per person, more than twice the level of town taxes, according to the latest data available from New York’s Office of the State Comptroller (OSC).

Though statewide reforms, such as caps on Medicaid cost sharing, have recently reined in county spending on a few key budget items, other expensive programs and planned capital improvements suggest that count budgets will continue to climb.


u u u


Bucking the trend of high tax bills and spending rates are Saratoga County and, to a lesser degree, the smaller counties of Herkimer and Madison. More worrisome budget numbers call for greater scrutiny of several counties, particularly Sullivan County, the highest-taxing jurisdiction in the sample, as well as Delaware, Greene and Warren.

As in previous columns that compared budgets for dozens of towns and villages, the county rankings are a preliminary tool that may overlook sound financial or political reasons why one municipality spends more than its peers. The detailed county rankings are available at our website, www.littletownviews.com, under the heading "Budget Scorecard Database."

Columbia County’s total levies per capita — which include property and sales tax receipts as well as various smaller charges — ran 16 percent higher than its peers in 2004, while its neighbor across the Hudson River, Greene, spent 28 percent more in tax revenues than the 22-county average. Dutchess County fell right in line with the average. Rensselaer County to the north distinguished itself by raising 23 percent less in property, sales and other taxes than the sample’s $680 per capita average.


u u u


The star performer among the 22-member sample is Saratoga County, which boasted total per capita tax receipts in 2004 of only $400 and ranked consistently among the lowest in per capita spending on the major county programs, including social services, police and public safety, transportation and general government.

"We don’t solve problems with a huge workforce," said Spencer Hellwig, Saratoga’s assistant county administrator. "Our 1,200 employees work hard and are extremely skilled... All budget requests are carefully scrutinized."

Saratoga’s unique degree of success in holding a lid on county spending calls for further analysis in a future column that will aim to identify management practices that less disciplined counties may want to adopt.

One county that could find fiscal guidance from Saratoga’s example is Sullivan County, which collected the largest amount of taxes per capita in the sample by a wide margin. Sullivan also spent the most per head on "general government" operations, which cover the executive, legislative, clerical and judicial dimensions of running a county. At $345 per capita in 2004, Sullivan spent twice as much as the sample average and nearly three times more than Rensselaer County, the most frugal on the general government ledger.

Sullivan County officials did not respond to repeated requests for comments.

Delaware County, which along with Sullivan and Greene had the highest taxes per head, also suffered from the fastest growth in taxes between 1999 and 2004, a rise of 63 percent.


u u u


Construction of a new $23 million state-mandated jail was one reason for the rapid rise in county costs, said Delaware Board of Supervisors Clerk Christa Schaefer. She also claimed that Delaware assumes more of the cost of maintaining town roads and bridges than do other counties.

One key contributor to Delaware’s fiscal burden is a substantially higher than average cost for social services, which include welfare, Medicaid, child care and other programs designed to assist the poorest segments of a county’s population. Delaware spent nearly $600 per capita on social services in 2004, more than twice as much as nearby Herkimer County, which, according to U.S. Census figures, has similar per capita income levels and 30 percent more people subsisting below the poverty line.

A more detailed review of the "Budget Scorecard Database" on our Web site suggests additional conclusions and identifies specific county comparisons that merit further analysis, among them:

• Columbia County boasts one of the lowest per capita debt loads, giving it ample room to leverage its balance sheet for the large capital projects it is now considering.

• Sullivan County has 45 percent more road mileage than Columbia County, but spent twice as much per road mile in 2004.

• Warren County has 63,000 residents, roughly one-third the population of Saratoga County, but it spent 35 percent more in total dollars on police protection and public safety in 2004.


James Sheldon, a writer and financial consultant, lives in the Columbia County town of Gallatin. His previous columns are available at his website, www.littletownviews.com.

Latest News

Mountaineers keep kicking in state tournament

Ava Segalla, Housatonic Valley Regional High School's all-time leading goal scorer, has takes a shot against Coventry in the Class S girls soccer tournament quarterfinal game Friday, Nov. 7.

Photo by Riley Klein

FALLS VILLAGE — Housatonic Valley Regional High School’s girls soccer team is headed to the semifinals of the state tournament.

The Mountaineers are the highest seeded team of the four schools remaining in the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference Class S playoff bracket.

Keep ReadingShow less
Legal Notices - November 6, 2025

Legal Notice

The Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Salisbury will hold a Public Hearing on Special Permit Application #2025-0303 by owner Camp Sloane YMCA Inc to construct a detached apartment on a single family residential lot at 162 Indian Mountain Road, Lakeville, Map 06, Lot 01 per Section 208 of the Salisbury Zoning Regulations. The hearing will be held on Monday, November 17, 2025 at 5:45 PM. There is no physical location for this meeting. This meeting will be held virtually via Zoom where interested persons can listen to & speak on the matter. The application, agenda and meeting instructions will be listed at www.salisburyct.us/agendas/. The application materials will be listed at www.salisburyct.us/planning-zoning-meeting-documents/. Written comments may be submitted to the Land Use Office, Salisbury Town Hall, 27 Main Street, P.O. Box 548, Salisbury, CT or via email to landuse@salisburyct.us. Paper copies of the agenda, meeting instructions, and application materials may be reviewed Monday through Thursday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 3:30 PM at the Land Use Office, Salisbury Town Hall, 27 Main Street, Salisbury CT.

Keep ReadingShow less
Classifieds - November 6, 2025

Help Wanted

Weatogue Stables has an opening: for a full time team member. Experienced and reliable please! Must be available weekends. Housing a possibility for the right candidate. Contact Bobbi at 860-307-8531.

Services Offered

Deluxe Professional Housecleaning: Experience the peace of a flawlessly maintained home. For premium, detail-oriented cleaning, call Dilma Kaufman at 860-491-4622. Excellent references. Discreet, meticulous, trustworthy, and reliable. 20 years of experience cleaning high-end homes.

Keep ReadingShow less