Latest News
Auto Repair
Blinds
Building/Remodeling
Floor Refinishing
Insulation
Landscaping
Landscaping
Lightning Rods
Moving
Overhead Doors
WINSTED — Pain at the pump continues in Winsted and across the state with many gas stations charging $4.11 a gallon as of Monday, April 25.This marks an 84-cent rise from the beginning of the year, when a gallon of gas averaged $3.27.According to fuelgaugereport.aaa.com, a gas price tracking website operated by the Automobile Association of America (AAA), the average price of gas for the region one year ago was $2.98 a gallon.Jim MacPherson, spokesman for Connecticut AAA, said that the high gas prices are taking a toll on drivers nationwide.“There has been a decrease in domestic demand for fuel because people are starting to drive less,” MacPherson said. “We can’t blame domestic demand as part of the cost push. There are so many factors and so many culprits to this story that you can run out of space writing about it.”The unrest in the Middle East continues to be a major factor in the high prices, as well as the continuing decrease in value of the American dollar.“Crude oil prices are now at a point that we have not seen in a couple of years,” MacPherson said. “If you go back to the peak of the high gas prices in 2008, the highest crude oil was trading was from $145 to $148 a barrel. Right now [as of Monday, April 25] they are $113 to $114 a barrel. We are seeing very high prices for crude oil.”MacPherson added that since civil unrest started in Libya, crude oil production in that country has been stopped.“It’s interesting to note that officials from Saudi Arabia originally suggested that their country would make up the difference, but they have chosen not to,” MacPherson said. “Will it climb up to $5 a gallon? I cannot say. If there is a supply disruption, a hurricane in the Gulf or a complete and total unraveling of the situation in the Middle East, it will put tremendous pressure on the cost of the fuel supply that is available. It’s hard to predict. In the past, I have seen a number of unforeseeable ugly events that have caused problems with gas prices.”According to MacPherson, the all-time high for gasoline prices in Connecticut is $4.39 a gallon in May 2008.While the consumer may be losing money due to high gas prices, oil companies are not suffering the same kind of loss.Multiple news outlets have reported this week that many of the international oil companies that serve America, including Exxon-Mobil and Sunoco, are seeing record profits in the range of billions of dollars.On Sunday, on the CBS television program “Face The Nation,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal called for the Department of Justice to investigate whether illegal practices are driving up gas prices in the state and all over the country.In the meantime, AAA Southern New England has issued a warning to drivers not to run their vehicles on empty.According to AAA, running a vehicle to the bottom of the gas tank may cause sediment to clog the automobile’s fuel pump, fuel filter or fuel injectors. It can also cause the electric fuel pump inside certain automobiles to overheat. Replacing any one of the fuel-related components can cost more than $500 in parts and labor.Several websites track gas prices locally and nationally, including fuelgaugereport.aaa.com, gasbuddy.com and autos.msn.com.
Related Stories
Get Local News Delivered To Your Inbox
Subscribe to receive stories reported for, by, and about our neighbors, on the issues affecting you.
By signing up you agree to our
privacy policy
.
Telecom Reg’s Best Kept On the Books
When Connecticut land-use commissions update their regulations, it seems like a no-brainer to jettison old telecommunications regulations adopted decades ago during a short-lived period when municipalities had authority to regulate second generation (2G) transmissions prior to the Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) being ordered by a state court in 2000 to regulate all cell tower infrastructure as “functionally equivalent” services.
It is far better to update those regs instead, especially for macro-towers given new technologies like small cells. Even though only ‘advisory’ to the CSC, the preferences of towns by law must be taken into consideration in CSC decision making. Detailed telecom regs – not just a general wish list -- are evidence that a town has put considerable thought into where they prefer such infrastructure be sited without prohibiting service that many – though not all – citizens want and that first responders rely on for public safety.
Such regs come in handy when egregious tower sites are proposed in sensitive areas, typically on private land. The regs are a town’s first line of defense, especially when cross referenced to plans of conservation and development, P&Z regulations, and wetlands setbacks. They identify how/where the town plans to intersect with the CSC process. They are also a roadmap for service providers regarding preferred sites and sometimes less neighborhood contention. In fact, to have no telecom regs can weaken a town’s rights to protect environmental, scenic, and historic assets, and serve up whole neighborhoods to unnecessary overlapping coverage and corporate overreach. Such regs are unique to every town and should not follow anyone else’s boiler plate, especially industry’s.
Connecticut is the only state that has a centralized siting entity for cell towers. The good news is that applicants must prove need for new tower sites in an evidentiary proceeding and any decisions have the weight of the state behind them. The bad news is that the CSC used to be far less industry-friendly and rote in their reviews, which now resemble a check list. There is an operative assumption at CSC that if an applicant wants a tower, they must need it, otherwise why spend significant money to run the approval gauntlet? This reflects a subtle shift over the years at CSC from sincere willingness to protect the environment toward minimal tweaking of bad applications with minor changes. The bottom line is that towns really cannot rely on the CSC to do all the work for them.
What CSC issues telecom providers is a “certificate of environmental compatibility” after an evidentiary proceeding (not unlike a court case) with intervenors, parties, expert witnesses, and the service provider’s technical pro’s sworn in and subject to cross examination. Service providers get to do the same with any opposition from intervenor/party participants – like towns and citizens -- and their experts. It’s an impressive process whose ultimate goal is the fine balancing between allowing adequate/reliable public services and protecting state ecology with minimal damage to scenic, historic, and recreational values. They unfortunately often fall short of their mandate – like approving cell towers with diesel generators over town aquifers -- evidenced by CSC only rejecting about five cell towers in the past 15-20 years.
The CSC was founded in 1972 and clarified its mission in the 1980’s to prevent the state from being carved up willy-nilly by gas pipelines, high tension corridors, and broadcast towers. With the sudden proliferation of cell towers beginning in late 1990’s, it became the most sued agency in Connecticut by both an arrogant upstart industry if applications were denied and by towns/citizens when bad sites were forced on them. CSC gradually formed a defensive posture that drives their decisions toward industry with deeper pockets and attorneys on retainer.
For citizens, nothing can wreck one’s day like the CSC. It behooves towns to protect what little toolkit they have, and understand the legal parameters of the CSC’s playing field. The CSC is not a “normal” government agency where municipal/citizen redress is based on logic and local support. Their process is largely immune to everything but specific kinds of evidence – like town regs with setbacks/fall zones, radio frequency transmission signal strengths, sensitive areas identified, and detailed wildlife inventory, among others.
There is a current cell tower fight involving two intervening towns -- Washington and Warren; both with good cell tower regs – over a tower site within 1200’ of a Montessori School, near Steep Rock’s nature preserves with comprehensive geology/wildlife databases that include endangered, threatened and special concern flora and fauna, on established federal/state migratory bird flyways, within throwing distance to a historic site capable of being listed on the Underground Railroad, and with an access road on a blind curve entering a state highway that will permanently damage wetlands, vernal pools, and core forests. There are well credentialed environmental experts, including Dr. Michael Klemens, former chair of Salisbury’s P&Z, as well as the former director of migratory bird management at the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and an RF engineer testifying to alternative approaches, plus three attorneys representing intervenors. It is the most professional challenge I have seen at CSC since Falls Village successfully mounted one that protected Robbins Swamps several years ago.
The hearing is ongoing, with uncertain results. To see what it takes today to stop an inappropriate tower siting, see Docket #543 under “Pending Matters” at https://portal.ct.gov/csc before removing local cell tower regs – the lowest hanging fruit that any town can possess in case it’s needed.
B, Blake Levitt is the Communications Director at The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council. She writes about how technology affects biology.