Brent Prindle


SHARON — Brent Prindle died peacefully Saturday morning, May 6, 2023, surrounded by family at UConn John Dempsey Hospital in Farmington after a long battle with bladder cancer. He was a month shy of his 83rd birthday. A lifelong, fourth-generation Sharon resident, Brent attended Sharon Center School and Oliver Wolcott High School and was deeply rooted in the community both as a tradesman and active volunteer.
Brent’s wife of nearly 60 years, Barbara, asked him shortly before he passed what he loved most. “It made me happy and gave me a lot of pleasure in my life to help my family and friends,” he said.
Brent’s first job after graduating from high school was at the Berkshire Transformer Co., a now-defunct electronics design and manufacturing firm in Kent, where he worked for 20 years, many of those as manufacturing manager.
He then joined Cornwall Electric where he worked for another 20 years, eventually buying the business, which he ran with Barbara. Brent used to say that he knew the inside of most homes in Sharon and that was surely the truth.
He developed an expertise in electronics and most things mechanical. He loved to take things apart — cars, lawn mowers, and anything electronic — to see how they worked and was skilled enough to put them back together, restored to working order. An early computer geek, Brent could write code and also solder together the components of a motherboard in the earliest days of computers.
“He had a computer before there were computers,” Barbara said.
Brent loved his family, NASCAR, gardening, and the Taghhannuck Grange, which he joined at age 14. He was instrumental in maintaining the historic Grange Hall on Dunbar Road in Ellsworth while also attracting new members to keep the agrarian organization thriving even as the number of local resident family farmers began to dwindle. He ran the Grange’s annual plant sale, a welcoming presence in a big straw hat who knew everything about each plant on offer. He loved working in his own vegetable garden — a love he inherited from his mother, Kay, who was passionate about organic gardening decades before that became a thing. Brent loved to cook and would run workshops at the Grange on how to can vegetables and make jams and jellies from the berries and quinces he would pick in the woods and along roadsides. His borscht was delicious.
As a member of the volunteer Sharon Fire Department, in 1968 he helped build the Ellsworth Fire Station which adjoins the Grange Hall. He also drove the Sharon Ambulance while volunteering for the Fire Department.
Brent served as assistant leader of Sharon’s Boy Scout troop as a young man, but then had the great fortune to have three daughters. He switched and led Sharon’s Girl Scout troop. He began tending the Ellsworth Cemetery 50 years ago, taking over the job from Ralph Dunbar. The painting of the white picket fence that used to surround the cemetery was both a Grange and family affair, until Brent determined the fence wood was shot. He replaced the picket fence with a handsome faux-wrought iron post and chain fence that stands today. He also was the caretaker for small cemeteries on East Street and Tichnor Road.
Brent was a long-time elected member of the Sharon Board of Assessment Appeals and could often be seen at meetings of other town boards and commissions, both as a knowledgeable resident able to offer advice and also to video meetings for viewing on the local public-access television and website. He was a founding volunteer in 2019 of the Sharon Connect Task Force, which is working to ensure all Sharon residents have access to high-speed internet at their homes. Brent used his knowledge of the town’s utility grid to map out where in town there was no access to high-speed internet and he was key in helping assess various plans being considered for how to wire the most unserved homes at the least expense to the town.
A steadfastly practical man, Brent even assured Barbara that his purchase of a 1972 Dino Ferrari for about $20,000 — the same amount as they spent to build their house — would be a good investment. The man knew sportscars. He initially courted Barbara by driving back and forth from Sharon to her college in Long Island in a two-seater Austin-Healy. He ended up owning five different Opel GTs and even had a Model A, though that classic wasn’t a sports car. He was practical, yes, and only drove the Ferrari on special occasions, but he did learn to race the “investment” at Skip Barber Racing School at Lime Rock Park.
Brent loved his family and stayed close. He and Barbara, who married on July 4, 1963, and therefore got to celebrate every anniversary with fireworks at Lime Rock Park, purchased land from his mother and built their house next door to her.
He had a generous heart and was always willing to share his knowledge to help others. Indeed, after surviving his first bout of bladder cancer, he and Barbara began running a support group for other cancer patients at UConn hospital, holding meetings one Saturday a month. The groups continued for 10 years, until Covid hit. Brent spent his last days at UConn hospital in hospice care and his family wishes to thank the doctors, nurses, and staff there for their exceptional care and kindness.
Brent was pre-deceased by his parents, Stuart and Kay Prindle, and his daughter Michele Prindle Eykelhoff. He is survived by his wife Barbara; his daughter Wendy Prindle Grillo and son-in-law Scott Grillo; his daughter Debbie Prindle Hanlon and fiancée Mike Taylor; his son-in-law Thomas Eykelhoff; his brothers Dale, Barc, and Warren; his sister Pam Barlowe (Prindle); and his grandkids Charissa, Mariah, Anna, Thomas, Kat, and Allie.
There will be celebration of life at a future date. In lieu of flowers, please send donations to Taghhannuck Grange, mailing address at 468 Cornwall Bridge Road, Sharon CT 06069.
State Sen. Stephen Harding
NEW MILFORD — State Sen. and Minority Leader Stephen Harding announced Jan. 20 the launch of his re-election campaign for the state’s 30th Senate District.
Harding was first elected to the State Senate in November 2022. He previously served in the House beginning in 2015. He is an attorney from New Milford.
In his campaign announcement, he said, “There is still important work to do to make Connecticut more affordable, government more accountable, and create economic opportunity. I’m running for reelection to continue standing up for our communities, listening to residents, and delivering real results.”
As of late January, no publicly listed challenger has filed to run against him.
The 30th District includes Bethlehem, Brookfield, Cornwall, Falls Village, Goshen, Kent, Litchfield, Morris, New Fairfield, New Milford, North Canaan, Salisbury, Sharon, Sherman, Warren, Washington, Winchester and part of Torrington.
MILLERTON — James (Jimmy) Cookingham, 51, a lifelong local resident, passed away on Jan. 19, 2026.
James was born on April 17, 1972 in Sharon, the son of Robert Cookingham and the late Joanne Cookingham.
He attended Webutuck Central School.
Jimmy was an avid farmer since a very young age at Daisey Hill and eventually had joint ownership of Daisey Hill Farm in Millerton with his wife Jessica.
He took great pride in growing pumpkins and sweet corn.
He was very outdoorsy and besides farming, loved to ride four wheelers, fish, and deer hunt. He also loved to make a roaring bonfire.
He was a farmer, friend, husband, father, son and brother. He will be missed by many.
He is survived by his father, Robert Cookingham, wife Jessica (Ball) Cookingham, daughters, Hailey Cookingham-Loiodice (Matt), Taylor Ellis-Tanner (Jimmy) and sister Brenda Valyou, as well as many cousins, nieces and nephews.
He is predeceased by his mother, Joanne (Palmer) Cookingham.
His daughter, Hailey, will always keep his legacy alive by their father-daughter antics, such as their handshake, nicknames and making “quacking noises” at each other.
Services/Memorials will be held at a later date.
The Kenny Funeral Home has care of arrangements.
Telecom Reg’s Best Kept On the Books
When Connecticut land-use commissions update their regulations, it seems like a no-brainer to jettison old telecommunications regulations adopted decades ago during a short-lived period when municipalities had authority to regulate second generation (2G) transmissions prior to the Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) being ordered by a state court in 2000 to regulate all cell tower infrastructure as “functionally equivalent” services.
It is far better to update those regs instead, especially for macro-towers given new technologies like small cells. Even though only ‘advisory’ to the CSC, the preferences of towns by law must be taken into consideration in CSC decision making. Detailed telecom regs – not just a general wish list -- are evidence that a town has put considerable thought into where they prefer such infrastructure be sited without prohibiting service that many – though not all – citizens want and that first responders rely on for public safety.
Such regs come in handy when egregious tower sites are proposed in sensitive areas, typically on private land. The regs are a town’s first line of defense, especially when cross referenced to plans of conservation and development, P&Z regulations, and wetlands setbacks. They identify how/where the town plans to intersect with the CSC process. They are also a roadmap for service providers regarding preferred sites and sometimes less neighborhood contention. In fact, to have no telecom regs can weaken a town’s rights to protect environmental, scenic, and historic assets, and serve up whole neighborhoods to unnecessary overlapping coverage and corporate overreach. Such regs are unique to every town and should not follow anyone else’s boiler plate, especially industry’s.
Connecticut is the only state that has a centralized siting entity for cell towers. The good news is that applicants must prove need for new tower sites in an evidentiary proceeding and any decisions have the weight of the state behind them. The bad news is that the CSC used to be far less industry-friendly and rote in their reviews, which now resemble a check list. There is an operative assumption at CSC that if an applicant wants a tower, they must need it, otherwise why spend significant money to run the approval gauntlet? This reflects a subtle shift over the years at CSC from sincere willingness to protect the environment toward minimal tweaking of bad applications with minor changes. The bottom line is that towns really cannot rely on the CSC to do all the work for them.
What CSC issues telecom providers is a “certificate of environmental compatibility” after an evidentiary proceeding (not unlike a court case) with intervenors, parties, expert witnesses, and the service provider’s technical pro’s sworn in and subject to cross examination. Service providers get to do the same with any opposition from intervenor/party participants – like towns and citizens -- and their experts. It’s an impressive process whose ultimate goal is the fine balancing between allowing adequate/reliable public services and protecting state ecology with minimal damage to scenic, historic, and recreational values. They unfortunately often fall short of their mandate – like approving cell towers with diesel generators over town aquifers -- evidenced by CSC only rejecting about five cell towers in the past 15-20 years.
The CSC was founded in 1972 and clarified its mission in the 1980’s to prevent the state from being carved up willy-nilly by gas pipelines, high tension corridors, and broadcast towers. With the sudden proliferation of cell towers beginning in late 1990’s, it became the most sued agency in Connecticut by both an arrogant upstart industry if applications were denied and by towns/citizens when bad sites were forced on them. CSC gradually formed a defensive posture that drives their decisions toward industry with deeper pockets and attorneys on retainer.
For citizens, nothing can wreck one’s day like the CSC. It behooves towns to protect what little toolkit they have, and understand the legal parameters of the CSC’s playing field. The CSC is not a “normal” government agency where municipal/citizen redress is based on logic and local support. Their process is largely immune to everything but specific kinds of evidence – like town regs with setbacks/fall zones, radio frequency transmission signal strengths, sensitive areas identified, and detailed wildlife inventory, among others.
There is a current cell tower fight involving two intervening towns -- Washington and Warren; both with good cell tower regs – over a tower site within 1200’ of a Montessori School, near Steep Rock’s nature preserves with comprehensive geology/wildlife databases that include endangered, threatened and special concern flora and fauna, on established federal/state migratory bird flyways, within throwing distance to a historic site capable of being listed on the Underground Railroad, and with an access road on a blind curve entering a state highway that will permanently damage wetlands, vernal pools, and core forests. There are well credentialed environmental experts, including Dr. Michael Klemens, former chair of Salisbury’s P&Z, as well as the former director of migratory bird management at the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and an RF engineer testifying to alternative approaches, plus three attorneys representing intervenors. It is the most professional challenge I have seen at CSC since Falls Village successfully mounted one that protected Robbins Swamps several years ago.
The hearing is ongoing, with uncertain results. To see what it takes today to stop an inappropriate tower siting, see Docket #543 under “Pending Matters” at https://portal.ct.gov/csc before removing local cell tower regs – the lowest hanging fruit that any town can possess in case it’s needed.
B, Blake Levitt is the Communications Director at The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council. She writes about how technology affects biology.