Thank you!
Your support is sustaining the future of local news in our communities.

Political will to spend for universal health care

The most serious objection, or query, relating to the provision of universal, national health insurance, including a public option as a matter of free choice for all Americans,  is the question of overall cost to a nation in recession, reeling from  decades of “laissez faireâ€� economics and foreign misadventures. What’s the cost of universal health care, and how can we possibly pay for it?

Back-of-the-napkin calculations suggest that the initial cost of setting up a national health insurance system with public option is on the order of $80 billion for the first two to four years.  (More serious analyses bear this figure out.) Thereafter, costs will trend towards complete financial self-sufficiency (no more taxpayer involvement) save for the continuing need to subsidize premiums for the truly poor.  Will Americans agree to pay the price to bring health care to all Americans, and help restore America’s position in the global economy?  

    u    u    u

American citizens have shown a willingness to allow their government, on false pretenses, to spend over $240 billion a year to kill Iraqis and destabilize the Middle East. That’s three times the cost of setting up national health insurance for all.  

Americans have also been willing to spend $880 billion over a two-year period, or $440 billion a year, to bail out the banks and businesses deemed “too big to fail� that brought us the recession in the first place. That’s more than five times the cost of introducing affordable health care for all Americans.

How did the government do it?  By printing money and borrowing from the Chinese — $680 billion a year.

Three plus five equals eight, that is, eight times the cost of universal health care.  Would Americans be willing to spend one-eighth of the above sums to establish a system of universal, affordable health-care insurance, for all Americans for all time?  Fully 72 percent of Americans say, Yes, we would.  Surely the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives can drum up, respectively, the 61 percent and 51 percent of votes needed.  It’s a matter of political will.

    u    u    u

How can the United States pay for all of this?  There are many ways to skin a cat. One way is to end the war in Iraq, right now, in 2009, and use one-third the money in 2010. Another is to reduce the corporate banking bailout and use one-fifth the money in 2010. If we had to, we could print the money or borrow it from the Chinese.  

Or would you prefer the cost be honestly included in the national budget?  No problem.  The solution is to close tax loopholes, cap deductions and ask the already wealthy to pay their fair share of Social Security and national health care.  

The point is, where there’s a will, there’s a way. The question is only whether we have the political will to do it.

Once the basic political decision is to go for “Health for All,â€�  the preference for a public option, as a matter of free choice, is obvious. It’s a “no-brainer.â€�  A well-designed public option has one-tenth the overhead, with no profit-taking, and more than 50 percent lower overall premium cost than current private insurance plans. No matter how the salami is sliced, between subscriber, employer or government footing the bill, the public plan costs less overall and delivers more for America. Private plans can co-exist, of course, but if they cannot keep up, if they fail in the head-to-head competition of the marketplace, well, so be it. They have other fish to fry.

    u    u    u

It would be a shame and a sham to pass a health reform bill without the public option.  A public option will keep the private health insurance industry honest.  A public option, unlike most private insurance these days, will not withhold coverage or fail to reimburse the subscriber due to alleged “pre-existing conditions,â€� or serious illness, or need for expensive treatment. No one, and certainly not a corporate executive, is to come between you and your doctor. The rules will be clean, clear and standardized.  As we work on them, we can disagree on some of the details, and we can amend those details as we go.  We can offer Americans a better deal.

Above all, you have freedom to choose.  Why not choose what’s best for your health?  Why not choose what’s best for America?  It’s all about political will.

Sharon resident Anthony Piel is a former director and legal counsel of the World Health Organization.

Latest News

Slow fashion takes the runway at Stone Ridge Orchard

The organic runway at HVSFW puts sustainable style among the apple trees at Stone Ridge Orchard.

Jay Ballesteros

Fast fashion has made it possible to buy the latest trend almost as quickly as it appears on social media. The environmental cost, however, is anything but fleeting. Fashion production accounts for about 10% of global carbon emissions, consumes enormous quantities of water and energy, and an estimated 85% of textiles end up in landfills each year. Synthetic fabrics also shed microplastics when washed.

So what would happen if we slowed things down?

Keep ReadingShow less
Susan Schneider and the magic of marbling
Susan Schneider, owner of Shandell’s in Ashley Falls, in her studio.
Susan Schneider, owner of Shandell’s in Ashley Falls, in her studio.
It’s a joyful process. —Susan Schneider

A beautiful September morning found Susan Schneider of Shandell’s working in her Ashley Falls home studio, while linen cocktail napkins she had marbled the day before hung on a line outside her back door. Her helpers, dogs Daisy and Stubbs, are never far from her.

“Marbling,” Schneider explained, “the art of floating paint on a liquid and printing it on a medium, has been around for hundreds of years.”

Keep ReadingShow less

Through the lens of war

Through the lens of war

“Omaha Beach Rescue, D-Day +1, Normandy, June 7, 1944.” one of the best-known photographs of D-Day.

Walter Rosenblum

Longtime Norfolk resident Nina Rosenblum will present her award-winning documentary, “They Fight With Cameras,” on Saturday, Sept. 26, at 6:30 p.m. at the Norfolk Library.

The film tells the story of her father, decorated U.S. Army Signal Corps combat cameraman Walter Rosenblum.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

Brian Gersten finds the story in the overlooked

Filmmaker Brian Gersten

D.H. Callahan

At 6 p.m. on Saturday, Sept. 26, award-winning filmmaker Brian Gersten will screen four short documentaries at the David M. Hunt Library in Falls Village, exploring obscure topics such as a lingering territorial dispute between the United States and Canada, a nationwide toilet paper panic sparked by a late-night joke, the infamous “Balloon Boy” saga and the history of bowling in America.

The Chicago-raised, Millerton-based filmmaker has worked as an editor on feature-length documentaries like the cycling film “Enter the Slipstream” and Netflix’s profile on author Tom Wolfe, “Radical Wolfe.” In 2025, “Why We Dream,” a film he edited about bringing D-Day veterans back to the beaches of Normandy, premiered aboard the U.S.S. Intrepid in New York City. When it comes to directing, Gersten’s own interests focus more on the underappreciated and unremembered, as the four short films he directed will demonstrate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sharon artist takes top prize at Lime Rock art show
Muriel Stockdale, left, and judge Roger McKee during the awards announcement at the juried art show at Trinity Episcopal Church. Stockdale\u2019s \u201cKevin\u201d was the second place winner.
Patrick L. Sullivan

The annual juried art show at Trinity Episcopal Church in Lime Rock was won by Mi-Kyung Hwang of Sharon for “Wild Hazelnut from Eggleston.”

The winners were announced at the show’s opening reception at the church Friday evening, Sept. 18.

Keep ReadingShow less
From Woodstock to the Warner, Graham Nash is still singing for peace

Graham Nash brings a career-spanning retrospective to the Warner Theatre in Torrington on Sept. 30, joined by Todd Caldwell, Adam Minkoff and Zack Djanikian.

Misti Layne

Imagine stepping out onto a stage in front of hundreds of thousands of tired, wet and weary strangers with a lineup of songs they’ve never heard before. If you’re Graham Nash, who will perform with his current band at the Warner Theatre in Torrington on Sept. 30, you don’t have to imagine. You only have to remember.

The legendary Woodstock music festival was only the second concert Nash played with Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. David Crosby, Stephen Stills and Nash had already formed Crosby, Stills & Nash, releasing their debut album earlier that year. Theirs was a sound both new and nostalgic when it hit the scene in the late 1960s, and, thanks in part to the success all three members had had with previous bands, they instantly found a wide and willing audience.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.