Who are these guys, anyway?

Connecticut’s U.S. Senate election is setting up to be a contest of unprecedented calculation, cliche and posing between two candidates who seem incapable of candor — Republican Linda McMahon, the wrestling entrepreneur, who is lost without the campaign playbook that is contriving a political identity for her, and Democrat Richard Blumenthal, who, after 20 years as attorney general, knows most issues cold but isn’t always sure what is safe to say and who lately has allowed his handlers to leash him as tightly as McMahon’s have leashed her.

Even before he got caught hallucinating that his service in a safe Marine Reserve unit in Washington, D.C., had taken him to war in Vietnam, Blumenthal was famous for speaking with slow precision lest more than the bare minimum of substance be conveyed. Now that he can be ambushed at any time with tedious questions about how he “misspoke� to ingratiate himself with military-oriented audiences, the once-ubiquitous attorney general is only warily returning to public forums.

It’s hard to blame Blumenthal for suffering shell shock as bad as any he might have suffered had he really been at Khe Sanh, what with McMahon bombarding the state with mailings and television and radio commercials disparaging him.

A recent McMahon mailer declares, “Dick Blumenthal dishonored our veterans by lying about serving in Vietnam,� and then depicts seven veterans with quotations expressing outrage. The Connecticut Post’s Brian Lockhart quickly determined that at least four of those seven supposedly outraged veterans are Republican town committee members.

Now a McMahon commercial is accusing Blumenthal of lying about not accepting campaign contributions from political action committees. McMahon’s commercial is itself a lie, as the Blumenthal comment it replays was made in January and referred to his previous campaigns, while his acceptance of a PAC contribution occurred only a few weeks ago after McMahon announced her readiness to spend an unprecedented $50 million to buy the election.

u      u      u

Meanwhile, McMahon’s ads boast that she won’t accept donations greater than $100 — not counting donations from herself, of course. She apparently expects voters not to notice the irony of claiming such virtue just for being rich. But it was an old conceit even in Chesterton’s time. He wrote: “You will hear everlastingly, in all discussions about newspapers, companies, aristocracies or party politics, this argument that the rich man cannot be bribed. The fact is, of course, that the rich man  is bribed; he has been bribed already. That is why he is a rich man.â€�

Apparently McMahon also does not expect voters to note the irony that someone who has performed no public service at all, someone who until recently hardly even voted, is presuming to disparage someone who has given many years of public service, good or bad, by which he may at least be judged.

Who is the real Linda McMahon? Who is the real Dick Blumenthal? Are there real people there, or just a nouveau riche opportunist who has run out of things to buy and a political careerist who has spent so long hunting for the main chance that mere compulsion has replaced any underlying purpose?

If there is something real behind the cynical facades, will either of them ever dare to trust Connecticut with an unscripted, genuine moment? And would such a candidate astound and win, or appall and lose?

Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer in Manchester.

Latest News

All are welcome at The Mahaiwe

Paquito D’Rivera performs at the Mahaiwe in Great Barrington on April 5.

Geandy Pavon

Natalia Bernal is the Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center’s education and community engagement manager and is, in her own words, “the one who makes sure that Mahaiwe events are accessible to all.”

The Mahaiwe’s community engagement program is rooted in the belief that the performing arts should be for everyone. “We are committed to establishing and growing partnerships with neighboring community and arts organizations to develop pathways for overcoming social and practical barriers,” Bernal explained. “Immigrants, people of color, communities with low income, those who have traditionally been underserved in the performing arts, should feel welcomed at the Mahaiwe.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Living with the things you love:
a conversation with Mary Randolph Carter
Mary Randolph Carter teaches us to surround ourselves with what matters to live happily ever after.
Carter Berg

There is magic in a home filled with the things we love, and Mary Randolph Carter, affectionately known as “Carter,” has spent a lifetime embracing that magic. Her latest book, “Live with the Things You Love … and You’ll Live Happily Ever After,” is about storytelling, joy, and honoring life’s poetry through the objects we keep.

“This is my tenth book,” Carter said. “At the root of each is my love of collecting, the thrill of the hunt, and living surrounded by things that conjure up family, friends, and memories.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Beloved classic film ‘The Red Shoes’ comes to the big screen for Triplex benefit
Provided

On Saturday, April 5, at 3 p.m., The Triplex Cinema in Great Barrington and Jacob’s Pillow, the dance festival in Becket, Massachusetts, are presenting a special benefit screening of the cinematic masterpiece, “The Red Shoes,” followed by a discussion and Q&A. Featuring guest speakers Norton Owen, director of preservation at Jacob’s Pillow, and dance historian Lynn Garafola, the event is a fundraiser for The Triplex.

“We’re pitching in, as it were, because we like to help our neighbors,” said Norton. “They (The Triplex) approached us with the idea, wanting some input if they were going to do a dance film. I thought of Lynn as the perfect person also to include in this because of her knowledge of The Ballets Russes and the book that she wrote about Diaghilev. There is so much in this film, even though it’s fictional, that derives from the Ballets Russes.” Garafola, the leading expert on the Ballets Russes under Serge Diaghilev, 1909–1929, the most influential company in twentieth-century theatrical dance, said, “We see glimpses of that Russian émigré tradition, performances we don’t see much of today. The film captures the artifice of ballet, from the behind-the-scenes world of dressers and conductors to the sheer passion of the audience.”

Keep ReadingShow less