
Latest News
As an architectural student in Philadelphia in the 1960’s, I used to come frequently to New York, arrivingby train at the magnificent Pennsylvania Station, designed by the country’s most famous architects, McKim, Mead and White to recall the Baths of Caracalla in Rome. My architectural schooling happened to coincide with the planned destruction of Penn Station; every time I passed through this Beaux Arts masterpiece it was a little smaller as it suffered a ruthless demolition. The sad scene made even Jackie Kennedy, who went on to help establish the New York City Landmark Preservation Commission, cry.
I am totally in favor of historic preservation. But it is one thing to greatly admire outstanding architecture from the distant past but something totally different to try to recreate it. The world today is so very different from that of 1800 years agoin Rome that comparisons are difficult. Most everything was different then. And today a modern train station bears little similarity to an ancient public bath.
Like nearly all architects today, I was trained to avoid thinking about style until the project I was working on was well along. Instead I was taught to gather all the significant information that might influence the final design: available construction materials and methods, site characteristics and surroundings, functional elements and their optimal arrangements, access, circulation considerations, etc. Integrating these aspects and many others usually gets one well along towards a design. But starting with a style, a picture of the end result, shortchanges all the other very important considerations and leads to a weak end result lacking authenticity.
Near the end of his first term, Trump issued an executive order mandating that “classical” architecture be the official “style” for Federal government buildings.Shortly after his inauguration a few months later President Biden rescinded Trump’s E.O. In 2022, Congressional bills by Republican Sen. Marco Rubio and Rep. Jim Banks, now a Senator, reiterated the substance of Trump’s Executive Order.
A competing measure was introduced by Rep. Dina Titus based on guidelines carefully drawn up in 1962 by Patrick Moynihan that eschewed partisan sentiments. She noted that “Federal design guidelines should not confine all architecture to one point in history.” All three bills have languished in committees.
But a day after being sworn in for his second term, President Trump issued the following Executive Order:
“I hereby direct the Administrator of the General Services Administration in consultation with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the heads of departments and agencies and the United States where necessary to submit to me within 60 days recommendations to advance the policy that Federal public buildings should be visually identifiable as civic buildings and respect regional, traditional, and classical architectural heritage in order to uplift and beautify public spaces and and ennoble the United States and our system of self-government...”
Trump’spast attempts at being a ”master builder” have not been well received by architectural critics. Ada Louise Huxtable’s review of the Trump Tower in Manhattan was withering: “Even with all of its pricey superglitz, it is an uncomfortable proportioned in its narrow verticality, unredeemed by the posh ladies’ powder-room decor that totally lacks the cosmopolitan style to which it so aggressively aspires.”One might wonder if such comments might have helped trigger Trump’s Executive Order.
Both of Trump’s executive orders have been roundly criticized with harsh, albeit polite denunciations from the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the American Society of Landscape Architects, the American Institute of Planners and the American Institute of Architects, not to mention thousands of letters from individual architects, nearly all of whom reiterated the idea expressed in the Moynihan document: “Design must flow from the architect to the government, not the other way around.”
Despite attempts to portray ancient Greek and Roman societies as democratic, they were far from it and their architecture expresses an autocratic society, not the more democratic sort we pride ourselves on.
In view of the momentous actions taken by the Trump administration in just its first few months, many readers may consider an Executive Order mandating a particular style of architectural design too trivial a matter for serious concern. But this mandate represents part of a larger, darker campaign to undo 250 years of democracy and shift nearly all power to the executive branch and the self-serving people now controlling it. If a dictator can determine the “style” of government buildings, where will it stop?
Architect and landscape designerMac Gordon lives in Lakeville.
Keep ReadingShow less
Celina Huber
A quarterly letter from the Salisbury Conservation Commission
Welcome to the Salisbury Conservation Commission’s quarterly missive. Our mission iseducation — educating ourselves as well as fellow Salisburyians on the important natural habitats specific to our beautiful and fascinating town, and how to preserve them.
Thomas Blagden
In this article we summarize “Water – Wetlands and Watercourses,” a chapter from the Town’s Natural Resources Inventory (NRI).You can find the whole NRI at www.salisburyct.us/town-documents/.
We like to think holistically about our natural resources and how they all work in concert to support the nature we love and steward.As we consider the lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, bogs, swamps, fens, and vernal pools of Salisbury, we are also thinking about what drains into them and how we can help to keep them clean, productive and viable habitats during our time here in Salisbury.
Salisbury is Wet and Wild — Summary of the NRI’s Water Section
Salisbury’s rich assemblage of wetlands and watercourses are the lifeblood of our landscape.We are fortunate to have many large bodies of water and riparian areas in town, all of which support and provide a multitude of habitats making up our unique and precious ecosystem.
For instance, Salisbury is home to two high elevation lakes that sit atop the Riga Plateau, also known as the Taconic Uplift: Riga Lake and South Pond.These lakes, sitting at a high elevation have colder water than any other water source in town, which flows down to swamps, wetlands and streams, supporting important native plants and animals such as brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus) (DEEP website) as well as the threatened spring salamander (Gyrinophilus porphyriticus). (Klemens et al.2021, Salisbury POCD, 2024).
Salisbury’s northwestern location within the state of Connecticut, its elevation gradient of close to 2,000 feet, and its relatively unfragmented landscape, have resulted in the town being a reservoir for biodiversity of statewide and regional significance. (Klemens et al, 2021) Using climate change modeling, it is predicted that Salisbury will be the only area in the state where certain cold-water species will be able to continue to flourish despite climate change.
Thomas Blagden
Hidden from view are extensive sand and gravel deposits known as till, which were deposited by the last glaciation some 12,000 years ago. Driving north on Undermountain Road these glacial terraces are clearly visible as gently undulating agricultural fields. Water percolates through these terraces and feeds the subterranean aquifer.This gives rise to many unusual habitats, such as fens, that contain endangered and rare species.
Salisbury’s rich assemblage of wetlands and watercourses are the lifeblood of our landscape.They add to our lives in obvious ways for recreation such as fishing, boating, and for drinking, but they also support productive and exceptional ecosystems that are not readily apparent.
Thomas Blagden
It is imperative to protect Salisbury’s waters as we protect our way of life in our town.Increased flooding from climate change along with development, especially around the lakes, is increasing runoff and pollutants into our water system.This toxic runoff threatens many wetland-dependent species of plants and animals that are at the core of our ecosystem.
The Conservation Commission wants to encourage landowners to not use fertilizer, herbicides and pesticides on their properties.The quality of our water resources is directly dependent on the choices we residents make in caring for our properties. Applied fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides eventually reach our waters with detrimental effects.For more science on this topic, please read: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844....
We would like to be interactive, so please send topic suggestions and comments to leepotter@salisburyct.gov.
Keep ReadingShow less
Letters to the Editor - May 1, 2025
Apr 30, 2025
Local food access: How to speak up, make your voice heard, on behalf of neighbors in need
Widespread hunger and food insecurity continue to be hidden problems throughout the region. A whopping $1 billion in funding cuts, announced by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in mid-March, have resulted in swift, direct, and devastating local impact. At St. Thomas Episcopal Church in Amenia, our Community of Radical Hospitality hinges on food distribution to neighbors in need—921 of whom visited the Food of Life/Comida de Vida Food Pantry on the last Friday in February. These individuals live in our neighborhoods and work at local businesses; they are the parents of our children’s classmates and contribute to the local community; and, amidst rising inflation and ongoing political uncertainty, they turn to us for assistance because they can’t afford to buy groceries.
As members of the New York Regional Food Bank, the USDA has been our primary source of reliable low- to no-cost protein—including pork, chicken, beef, fish, eggs, nuts and peanutbutter—for the last 15 years. In the wake of drastic and unexpected cuts, the once abundant selection of quality protein is growing smaller and more costly. While we have been spared any weeks without protein for distribution (a blessing due to careful advance planning by our pantry manager), we anticipate availability will continue to plummet. The end of two pandemic-era programs (including the Local Food Purchase Assistance Program, which enabled states to buy fresh food direct from farmers and distribute it to local organizations helping communities in need) has revealed a stark truth: the vast chasm between the haves and the have-nots in Dutchess County is growing, and the impending crisis demands immediate attention from the community at large.
Donations of shelf-stable food are not the answer. In an effort to provide well-rounded pantry staples for all, we need to raise dollars and awareness in equal amounts. Money means we are able to expand our relationships with local farmers, through partnerships with Tri Corner FEED (Food Equity, Education, and Distribution) and the Tenmile Farm Foundation, to keep our neighbors nourished. Advocacy equates to contacting your state and federal representatives; voicing concern about barriers to local food access; and letting them know you are a constituent who is asking for action!
Food is a basic human right. While eradicating the myriad barriers to access in our region may not be imminent, it is our collective responsibility to ensure dignity for all. Together, many hands will surely make light work of bringing this issue into the spotlight where—with increased visibility—it can be seen and solved.
The Rev. AJ Stack
Priest-in-Charge
Executive Director, Food of Life/Comida de Vida Pantry
Amenia
Time to save democracy
My father, my grandfather, and probably my great grandfathers, were Republicans in the tradition of Lincoln, Eisenhower, and Reagan, and I am proud of their accomplishments for our country.But they would be truly appalled by how much of what they supported, at home and abroad, is now being destroyed by Trump and his MAGA Republicans.
It is time for traditional Republicans, together with Democrats, independents, progressives, and conservatives,to support our democracyand our Constitution.
We all should rally—with speeches, votes, letters,lawsuits—to Lincoln’s famous words at Gettysburg: …It is for us, the living…that we here highly resolve…that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom…that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.
Alice Yoakum
Lakeville
For the sake of libraries
I am horrified by the cuts to our Connecticut library system.
As the town with the country’s oldest lending library, let us step forward and fundraise to reinstitute the statewide interlibrary loan system. If each library in Connecticut could raise money it may be possible. We have to try.
I hope that those at Scoville, and the savvy fundraisers among us, can generate some ideas that the community will support. I know that I am not alone in mydesperation for action.
Jill Esterson
Salisbury
Keep ReadingShow less
loading