Media vs. the ‘Monsterverse’ (It’s Not about Godzilla)

Peter Kaufman’s new book addresses the challenges of “truthiness.”
Photo by Sophia Kaufman
In his new book, “The New Enlightenment and the Fight to Free Knowledge,” Peter Kaufman (an author who lives in Lakeville, Conn.) takes us deep into history to locate the moments when information was made accessible to the people — and the moments when making it accessible was a crime punishable by death.
Part history, part polemic, “The New Enlightenment” is a call to action to Make Knowledge Great Again (MKGA?). Kaufman draws inspiration from the 18th-century French Encyclopédie — the first comprehensive encyclopedia available to the masses, which sparked the original Enlightenment — and its modern equivalent, Wikipedia. He also looks longingly to the brief, but abortive, golden age of public television, when leading American thinkers envisioned a medium for, well, enlightenment.
Aligned against such progressive dreams is what Kaufman calls the “Monsterverse,” a complicated brew of both too much deregulation and too much private control of media, not to mention the rampant anti-intellectualism and counterfactual QAnon-ism of our present moment.
We interviewed Kaufman recently about his book, which was published Feb. 25.
Compass: You finished “The New Enlightenment” last year and wrote about the threat of literal violence from the unregulated circulation of ideas. Having seen the events of Jan. 6 and the storming of the Capitol, how do you feel about what you wrote now?
Peter Kaufman: The book ends with a vision of the nation beginning to tear itself in two, and violently, because of our information disorder. In fact, the health, economic and political crises we face are all due in large measure to this disorder. It surprises me we don’t talk about it more.
C: Explain what you call the “information disorder.”
PK: Mark Twain once said, “A lie will travel around the whole world while the truth is getting its boots on.” That’s especially true when the lie comes from literally the most powerful person on the planet. On one hand, you have this system of politicians echoing media networks and vice versa; Trump brought that into a new adulthood. On the other, the richest and deepest knowledge institutions — a Field Museum in Chicago, or a MOMA [Museum of Modern Art] in New York — deal in fact and what’s true. But they’re not empowered to counter the disinformation.
C: Isn’t the web the great equalizer and democratizer? Someone can find almost any information they want, or take a free online course. Isn’t that what the creators of the Encyclopédie were after? Why regulate that?
PK: These are great freedoms, just as I can walk to the Scoville Library and look at anything on the shelf, or to the Salisbury Pharmacy for a newspaper or magazine. What’s missing are good books, magazines and newspapers. The progressive forces in this country need to publish more. Or think about the original impetus for television and the screen as an educational apparatus. Things unfolded differently. The forces on the other side managed to hack away at regulations and restrictions on what can and can’t be seen. We should regulate for the same reason it’s not a good idea to allow drugs to be sold on a playground.
C: But what about Trump being banished from social media? If he could be banned, couldn’t you or I? A lot of people on the left are equally concerned. Who decides what’s allowable or not?
PK: You’re forgetting that Twitter and Facebook are private platforms. They’re not obliged by statute to follow public mandates. That’s why Wikipedia and other publicly owned assets, such as public radio and TV, are so important. Unfortunately, their market share today is a shadow and sliver of an afterthought compared to everything else. We need to revisit the original intentions of some of our media visionaries like [former FCC Chair] Newton Minow and Edward R. Murrow.
C: You talk a lot about universities, libraries and archives having a critical role in producing public knowledge.
PK: Listen, when 60% of Americans believe in angels, 40-50% don’t believe in evolution, and a large group of people believe Democrats are making Jewish space laser pizza babies, you have your work cut out for you. I work at MIT in an office that produces open courseware and runs the most popular dot-edu YouTube channel. We have over 3 million subscribers. But compared to what it could be? We need to put out a lot more [educational content]. I’m writing another book specifically to answer this question.
I will say that what’s needed is courage from educational leaders to counter so much misinformation. If we don’t speak out now, then when?
A Cessna 172 experienced mechanical failure, forcing an emergency landing at Lime Rock Park Saturday, Sept. 20.
LIME ROCK — At 1 p.m. on Saturday, Sept. 20, a small aircraft with two individuals on board crashed after performing an emergency landing at Lime Rock Park after a reported mechanical failure.
As of 4 p.m., the area remained closed for investigation and the containment of a small fuel leak.
Lime Rock’s Emergency Services team was the first to respond to the incident. The team’s director, Keith Byrne, said that of the two occupants in the plane, the pilot was uninjured while the passenger sustained possible minor injuries. His team transported the passenger to a local hospital where the individual is being evaluated.
“It was a huge relief once we saw them getting out the plane with nothing on fire,” Byrne said of arriving on the scene.
The aircraft, which reportedly originated its flight in Poughkeepsie, New York, was a Cessna 172, a highly popular four-seat, single-engine plane. Lime Rock flaggers saw the aircraft circling above the facility as it called in an emergency landing.
It landed near the west bend portion of the track heading west, where it continued onto the grass, through a wire fence and over a guardrail before coming to an uncontrolled rest on another section of the track. Tire marks on the asphalt and grass showing its path were visible.
Teams from the Lakeville Hose Company, the Falls Village Volunteer Fire Department and the Salisbury Volunteer Ambulance Service assisted Lime Rock Emergency Services in the response.
At 4:15 p.m., personnel onsite were awaiting the arrival of representatives of the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Transportation Safety Board and Connecticut State Police to conduct an investigation. More details surrounding the incident are expected to become available once the investigation is complete.
A decision in the case of Jacquier vs. Camardi is expected by Friday, Sept. 26.
NORTH CANAAN — Should two Democratic Town Committee candidates be included on the November ballot despite errors in the endorsement paperwork?
That is the question Judge Ann E. Lynch faces in the case of Jacquier vs. Camardi. Lawyers for each side submitted written arguments to Torrington Superior Court on Friday, Sept. 19.
Both briefs address the matter of substantial compliance — as opposed to strict compliance — with election laws.
On July 22, the DTC nominated Jean Jacquier to run for Town Clerk and Carol Overby to run for Board of Finance, but neither candidate included the office or term on the official endorsement slate. Upon review, Connecticut Secretary of the State Election Officer Heather Augeri stated the slate was invalid and she advised Marilisa Camardi, acting Town Clerk and defendant in this case, to remove the candidates from the ballot.
Plaintiffs Jacquier and Overby did not deny that the endorsement slate was submitted with missing information. Attorney John Kennelly argued that they should be included on the ballot because they achieved substantial compliance with the law.
“At first glance, the statutory language in C.G.S. 9-391 appears to be mandatory. However, our State Supreme Court has recognized that voters (in this case caucus voters and ultimately the voters of North Canaan) should not be disenfranchised for minor violations of even mandatory election statutes,” Kennelly’s brief states.
In conclusion, Kennelly urged the court to require Camardi to include Jacquier and Overby on all ballots pertaining to the Nov. 4 election.
Camardi’s attorney Thomas Gerarde argued, “strict compliance is required such that neither the election official nor the Court can excuse a candidate’s inadvertent noncompliance.”
Gerarde stated the plaintiffs have not had any rights violated and their request for relief should be denied. “The omission of the Plaintiffs from the ballot as Democratic Party-Endorsed Candidates comports with the law and is a result required by law.”
Judge Lynch is expected to make a ruling by Friday, Sept. 26.
Jean Jacquier, North Canaan’s current Town Clerk, has been elected four times as a Republican. Following a legal dispute with First Selectman Brian Ohler (R) she vacated her office in Town Hall and has not returned since February 2025. In July she was endorsed by the DTC to run for Town Clerk.
Camardi is Jacquier’s part time assistant and has been filling in as acting Town Clerk since February. Camardi is not running for office.
The Republican Town Committee candidate for Town Clerk this year is Krysti Segalla.
Carol Overby is one of two DTC candidates for Board of Finance. The other is Emily Bottum.
The RTC candidate for Board of Finance is John Jacquier.
Also on the North Canaan ballot this year will be three questions asking voters to decide if the positions of Town Clerk, Tax Collector and Treasurer should be elected or appointed. Currently all three positions are elected. If voters choose to appoint these positions moving forward, the change would take effect at the end of the next term for each official.
SHARON — Sharon Dennis Rosen, 83, died on Aug. 8, 2025, in New York City.
Born and raised in Sharon, Connecticut, she grew up on her parents’ farm and attended Sharon Center School and Housatonic Valley Regional High School. She went on to study at Skidmore College before moving to New York City, where she married Dr. Harvey Rosen and together they raised two children.
Sharon’s lifelong love of learning and the arts shaped both her work and her passions. For decades, she served as a tour guide at the American Museum of Natural History and the Asia Society, sharing her knowledge and enthusiasm with countless visitors. She also delighted in traveling widely, immersing herself in other cultures, and especially treasured time spent visiting her daughter and grandsons in Europe and Africa.
She was also deeply connected to her hometown, where in retirement she spent half her time and had many friends. She served as President of the Sharon East Side Cemetery until the time of her death, where generations of her family are buried and where she will also be laid to rest.
She is survived by her husband, Harvey; her children, Jennifer and Marc; and four beloved grandchildren.
Claire and Garland Jeffreys in the film “The King of In Between.”
There is a scene in “The King of In Between,” a documentary about musician Garland Jeffreys, that shows his name as the answer to a question on the TV show “Jeopardy!”
“This moment was the film in a nutshell,” said Claire Jeffreys, the film’s producer and director, and Garland’s wife of 40 years. “Nobody knows the answer,” she continued. “So, you’re cool enough to be a Jeopardy question, but you’re still obscure enough that not one of the contestants even had a glimmer of the answer.”
Garland Jeffreys never quite became a household name, but he carved out a singular place in American music by refusing to fit neatly into any category. A biracial New Yorker blending rock, reggae, soul and R&B, he used genre fusion as a kind of rebellion — against industry pigeonholes, racial boundaries and the musical status quo. Albums like “Ghost Writer” (1977) captured the tension of a post–civil rights America, while songs like “Wild in the Streets” made him an underground prophet of urban unrest. He moved alongside artists like Lou Reed and Bruce Springsteen but always in his own lane — part poet, part agitator, part bridge between cultures.
“I think what I tried to do with the film, wittingly or unwittingly, was just to show that we all have these lives and they don’t often meet our dreams of what we think we’re entitled to, we’re talented enough to get or whatever,” said Claire. “We all have these goals, but we’re sort of stymied. Often, it’s partly circumstance and luck, but it’s also very often something that we’re doing or not doing that’s impeding us.”
This is not the typical rock-and-roll redemption story. There are no smashed guitars, no heroic overdoses, no dramatic comeback tour. What we get instead is something quieter and more intimate: hours of archival footage that Claire spent years sorting through. The sheer effort behind the film is palpable — so much so that, as she admitted with a laugh, it cured her of any future ambitions in filmmaking.
“What I learned with this project was A, I’m never doing it again. It was just so hard. And B, you know, you can do anything if you collaborate with people that know what they’re doing.”
Claire worked with the editing team of Evan M. Johnson and Ben Sozanski and a slew of talented producers, and ended up with a truthful portrayal — a beautiful living document for Garland’s legions of fans and, perhaps most importantly, for the couple’s daughter, Savannah.
“She’s been in the audience with me maybe three or four times,” said Claire. “The last time, I could tell that she was beginning to feel very proud of the effort that went into it and also of being a part of it.”
Savannah pursued a career in music for a while herself but has changed tracks and become a video producer.
“I think she couldn’t quite see music happening for herself,” said Claire. “She was like, ‘I don’t know if I want to struggle the way I saw my dad struggling and I’m going to get a job with a salary.’”
The film doesn’t just track the arc of an underappreciated musician, however. The music, always playing, is the soundtrack of a life — of a man navigating racial, musical and personal boundaries while balancing marriage, parenthood, aging, addiction andrecovery. Garland and Claire speak plainly about getting sober in the film, a life choice that gave them both clarity and shows Claire as a co-conspirator in his survival.
“I did some work early on with a director,” said Claire. “He wanted the final cut, and I didn’t feel like I could do that — not because I wanted so much to control the story, but I didn’t want the story to be about Alzheimer’s.”
Diagnosed in 2017, Garland, now 81, is in the late stages of the disease. Claire serves as his primary caregiver. The film quietly acknowledges his diagnosis, but it doesn’t dwell — a restraint that feels intentional. Garland spent a career refusing to be reduced: not to one sound, one race or one scene. And so the documentary grants him that same dignity in aging. His memory may be slipping, but the film resists easy sentimentality. Instead, it shows what remains — his humor, his voice, his marriage, the echo of a life lived on the edges of fame and at the center of his own convictions.
The Moviehouse in Millerton will be screening “The King of In Between” on Sept. 20 at 7 p.m. Peter Aaron, arts editor of Chronogram Magazine will conduct a talkback and Q&A with Claire Jeffreys after the film. Purchase tickets at themoviehouse.net.