The golden fleece of public broadcasting producers

As a sometime producer for television, I can tell you the name of the game is making a budget so low that it leaves profit for the producer after the show is sold. Sounds easy, but it is not, especially these days.

When budgeting for television, for example, producers often make the show for U.S. broadcasting at no profit whatsoever, relying on the Internet spin-off and foreign sales to make any profit at all. Are they paid a salary for production? Sure, but huge salaries like Aaron Spelling’s millions for “90210� are a thing of the past — way past.

When you do not have “real� commercials, the fight for budget and profit becomes even harder. PBS stations beg and plead for your donations and support. They run sponsorship commercials, get foundations to pitch in and squeeze producers to cut prices, often denying any profit to producers? “Sesame Street,� for example, makes no profit from sales to PBS, relying on merchandising alone to pay most of the staff.

    u    u    u

Which is why it annoys me to see public money and charitable donations being thrown at producing stations in the public broadcasting arena, like WGBH in Boston. WGBH has an arrangement with the BBC. The BBC Bristol documentary folks make world-ranging, award-winning documentaries for their show, “Horizon.� WGBH takes the BBC show, relabels it NOVA and re-edits only the credits and bits of voiceover to make it look like it is a WGBH production.

Hold on to your hats... their “cost� for the relabeling? In 1987, for a show I produced with the BBC, WGBH charged PBS stations $200,000 for a half-day’s work, tops. And that original show we made on the Voyager flight in 1986 had a production budget of $38,000. When I called WGBH to ask what their current budget per show is, they said, “We’re private company and do not have to reveal that figure.� So much for public TV broadcasting; no public access.

    u    u    u

When you make a radio show, however, costs can be contained more easily than shipping crew and gear to Mojave, India, Africa or wherever. Radio has always been a source of profit simply because the costs of audio studio production are usually lower than any video production. So, radio is mostly profitable for producers. The same cannot be said for the radio stations, especially the public radio stations.

National Public Radio (NPR), created in 1970 by President Johnson, is a privately and publicly funded nonprofit media partnership (sort of) consisting of about 800 radio stations, supported in part by taxpayer dollars through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). The purpose is simple really. In the interest of a balanced media — commercial versus public — NPR stations are to provide entertainment, news, culture and opinion as they see fit.

How do they choose what to broadcast? Because they are funded by donations and support, the less popular the programming, the lower its support. It’s a version of the capitalist system and, so far, it has worked. The problem happens when the tail begins wagging the dog.

    u    u    u

The producer of “Car Talk� is Doug Berman. Berman is a powerful radio producer. He controls two of the most popular programs on NPR. These are very cheap programs to produce compared to news reporting, cultural events, international audio-documentaries and even the payment of royalty fees for popular music.

Imagine: You have two funny and jovial men sitting in a small studio in Boston, taking unpaid calls from listeners, dispensing advice, making a recording. Cost? Oh, let’s be generous and say, below the line (that’s a term meaning the actual out-of-pocket cost, less salaries), $20,000.

Now, imagine you sell that show, because it is popular, to impoverished public stations across the nation without the funds to make their own shows. What do you charge them? How about this... little WAMC (which you all receive; they have more than 20 smaller broadcasting “stations�) pays $300 a week. WJZZ in Phoenix pays $1,000 a week (they are a major metropolitan broadcaster, after all).

So, let’s see, if you average out the 800 or so stations, let’s call it $80 per station, times 800 stations, that gives you an income (less production) of $44,000 per week, 50 weeks a year (they sell repeats, too, to fill in the time). Berman’s production company probably makes, gross, about $2.5 million a year on this one show. Of course, Click and Clack get paid... but there’s also income from the CPB, the Internet advertising, the cash from sponsors of the actual show (which they plug on the air), the merchandise, and so forth.

When you look at the No. 1 show on NPR, Berman’s “Wait, Wait... Don’t Tell Me,� the numbers are even better. And American Public Media’s “Prairie Home Companion?� Don’t ask, that’s a cash machine, even exporting programming in Europe. Compared to two TV producers I know, making shows for prime-time television, the NPR show producers are making more profit in the public arena than they are. Yes, radio producers can actually make more than TV producers. And they are doing it with your donor support.

    u    u    u

There is nothing wrong with the capitalist system. There is nothing wrong with Berman, WGBH, NPR and others making profits from popular programming. What is wrong is that you, the public, the taxpayer (via CPB) and donor, are not entitled to see who’s getting what, why, and how much.

Twenty million people tune in to NPR, 20 million people who only hear the pleas for funding from volunteers and long-standing audio pals like Alan Chartock or David Galletly of WAMC. At least half of what they need is probably used to pay for excessive profits by producers, leaving less than half to run their stations, retain employees paid at reasonable pay scales and, generally, act in the spirit of public radio.

Remember, public radio is your radio, it does need your support more than ever, but it also needs your interest, your voice, your “vote� in keeping the profiteers at bay. That is, of course, unless you want a broadcasting fleecing à la AIG on your hands.

Peter Riva, formerly of Amenia Union, lives in New Mexico.

Latest News

Sharon voters reject controversial school budget, 114-99

The May 8 town meeting and budget vote were moved from Sharon Town Hall to Sharon Center School to accommodate what officials said was the largest turnout for a Sharon budget meeting in recent years.

Alec Linden

SHARON – More than 200 residents packed the Sharon Center School gymnasium Friday, May 8, where voters narrowly rejected the Sharon Board of Education's proposed 2026-2027 spending plan by a vote of 114-99, sending the budget back to the Board of Finance after weeks of heated debate over school funding.

The rejected proposal – the ninth version of the budget since deliberations began months ago – carried a bottom line of $4,165,513 for the elementary school, unchanged from last year. The flat budget came after the BOF ordered the BOE in early April to remove nearly $70,000 from its spending plan.

Keep ReadingShow less

Liane McGhee

Liane McGhee
Liane McGhee
Liane McGhee

Liane McGhee, a woman defined by her strength of will, generosity, and unwavering devotion to her family, passed away leaving a legacy of love and cherished memories.

Born Liane Victoria Conklin on May 27, 1957, in Sharon, CT, she grew up on Fish Street in Millerton, a place that remained close to her heart throughout her life. A proud graduate of the Webutuck High School Class of 1975, Liane soon began the most significant chapter of her life when she married Bill McGhee on August 7, 1976. Together, they built a life centered on family and shared values.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Women Laughing’ celebrates New Yorker cartoonists

Ten New Yorker cartoonists gather around a table in a scene from “Women Laughing.”

Eric Korenman

There is something deceptively simple about a New Yorker cartoon. A few lines, a handful of words — usually fewer than a dozen — and suddenly an entire worldview has been distilled into a single panel.

There is also something delightfully subversive about watching a room full of women sit around a table drawing them. Not necessarily because it seems unusual now — thankfully — but because “Women Laughing,” screening May 9 at The Moviehouse in Millerton, reminds us that for much of The New Yorker’s history, such a gathering would have been nearly impossible to imagine.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

By any other name: becoming Lena Hall

By any other name: becoming Lena Hall

In “Your Friends and Neighbors,” Lena Hall’s character is also a musician.

Courtesy Apple TV
At a certain point you stop asking who people want you to be and start figuring out who you already are.
Lena Hall

There is a moment in conversation with actress and musician Lena Hall when the question of identity lands with unusual force.

“Well,” she said, pausing to consider it, “who am I really?”

Keep ReadingShow less
Remembering Todd Snider at The Colonial Theatre

“A Love Letter to Handsome John” screens at The Colonial Theatre on May 8.

Provided

Fans of the late singer-songwriter Todd Snider will have a rare opportunity to gather in celebration of his life and music when “A Love Letter to Handsome John,” a documentary by Otis Gibbs, screens for one night only at The Colonial Theatre in North Canaan on Friday, May 8.

Presented by Wilder House Berkshires and The Colonial Theatre, the 54-minute film began as a tribute to Snider’s friend and mentor, folk legend John Prine. Instead, following Snider’s death last November at age 59, it became something more intimate: a portrait of the alt-country pioneer during the final year of his life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sharon Playhouse debuts new logoahead of 2026 season

New Sharon Playhouse logo designed by Christina D’Angelo.

Provided

The Sharon Playhouse has unveiled a new brand identity for its 2026 season, reimagining its logo around the silhouette of the historic barn that has long defined the theater.

Sharon Playhouse leadership — Carl Andress, Megan Flanagan and Michael Baldwin — revealed the new logo and website ahead of the 2026 season. The change reflects leadership’s desire to embrace both the Playhouse’s history and future, capturing its nostalgia while reinventing its image.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.