Haiti relief shows the UN and the USA at our best

The earthquake in Haiti is the worst human tragedy in recent memory, possibly eclipsing the tsunami that hit Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia in 2004, and the Hutu-Tutsi genocide in Rwanda, Burundi and Congo in 1994, with which I became involved as a WHO liaison to the U.S. military, who in spite of adverse press commentary, performed superbly. We are seeing the same in Haiti.

The immediate response to disasters of this magnitude has to consist of: (1) search and rescue of survivors, as well as the provision of (2) potable water, (3) essential food supplies, (4) basic sanitary facilities, (5) emergency medical supplies and care, (6) dignified, safe body disposal, and (7) shelter and clothing against the elements. These must be accompanied, however, by restoration of (8) communications, (9) transportation and (10) security, without which the first seven relief items are practically impossible.

u      u      u

A specific, critical responsibility of the World Health Organization, through its regional Pan American Health Organization, is to anticipate, detect, prevent and ultimately help control the outbreak of disaster-related communicable diseases, such as dysentery, cholera, typhoid and malaria. Many of these are water-related. WHO’s job is to be sure the right science is brought in and applied to the problem, irrespective of who provides or pays for the drugs, vaccines or equipment.

In carrying out this responsibility, WHO advises and works closely with local and national officials, U.N. sister agencies, aid agencies, NGOs, churches and charitable groups to ensure a swift, appropriate, science-based response and set in motion the eventual rehabilitation and longer-term strengthening of the local, district and national health systems — long after the international media have lost interest and gone home.

As we shall soon see in Haiti, natural disasters lead to further man-made disasters: crime and violence by desperate people, calling for responsible police action and peace-keeping. Here the U.S. military, if they have “boots on the ground,� must tread carefully, “do no harm,� and not appear as an invading or occupying force (as we do in Afghanistan and Iraq). In the longer term, the overall efforts will shift to reconstruction of housing, infrastructure, democratic institutions and the economy — in short, the rebuilding of a nation.

u      u      u

There is a silver lining to the Haitian tragedy: The people of America, Haiti and the entire world get to see what the United Nations system, the U.S. government (particulrly USAID and the U.S. military) and the international community are capable of doing by acting together, not for private profit-taking, but for the public good. In recent years, there has been so much bad-mouthing of both the U.N. and the U.S. military from the so-called left and so-called right, it is high time people get to see the truth, if only on the TV screen in their own home.

What can Americans as individuals do for Haiti? Some private American citizens are able to get to Haiti to help in the relief effort, but in doing so they must be concerned to coordinate their actions with local, national, U.N. and U.S. authorities. For most Americans, however, the best way to to help the people of Haiti is to contribute money to any of the above relief agencies who have their “boots on the ground� and are designed and equipped to do this work.

Conservative guru and TV talk show host Rush Limbaugh has urged Americans not to contribute to relief work in Haiti, because, he says, success will brighten the image of Barack Obama. You can see the values Limbaugh represents in this country. Certainly, President Obama’s response to the Haiti earthquake in 2010 outshines the previous administration’s response to Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans in 2006.

More to the point: If America’s exercise of power abroad were better associated in people’s minds with humanitarian responses like this in Haiti, anti-American terrorism would simply disappear from the face of the earth. Relief of Haiti is clearly in America’s own enlightened self-interest. Yet, we do it because it’s right.

Sharon resident Anthony Piel is a former director and legal counsel of the World Health Organization.

Latest News

Love is in the atmosphere

Author Anne Lamott

Sam Lamott

On Tuesday, April 9, The Bardavon 1869 Opera House in Poughkeepsie was the setting for a talk between Elizabeth Lesser and Anne Lamott, with the focus on Lamott’s newest book, “Somehow: Thoughts on Love.”

A best-selling novelist, Lamott shared her thoughts about the book, about life’s learning experiences, as well as laughs with the audience. Lesser, an author and co-founder of the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, interviewed Lamott in a conversation-like setting that allowed watchers to feel as if they were chatting with her over a coffee table.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reading between the lines in historic samplers

Alexandra Peter's collection of historic samplers includes items from the family of "The House of the Seven Gables" author Nathaniel Hawthorne.

Cynthia Hochswender

The home in Sharon that Alexandra Peters and her husband, Fred, have owned for the past 20 years feels like a mini museum. As you walk through the downstairs rooms, you’ll see dozens of examples from her needlework sampler collection. Some are simple and crude, others are sophisticated and complex. Some are framed, some lie loose on the dining table.

Many of them have museum cards, explaining where those samplers came from and why they are important.

Keep ReadingShow less