Lawmakers should consider their own wasteful spending


The global economic crisis is hitting home. The Connecticut General Assembly is frantically looking for ways to provide other revenue sources for the state and municipalities. There are many bad ideas floating around that demonstrate an inability to consider the consequences.

For example, the General Assembly, itself a beneficiary of the go-go economic days when money seemed limitless, is looking to tax not-for-profit organizations that are a potential lifeline to thousands of Connecticut residents.

Before burdening these important not-for-profit agencies, the General Assembly should examine its own activities and spending. The Legislature last year drafted more than 3,300 pieces of legislation, of which 1,444 made it out of committee and 205 actually passed. Did we really need 205 more laws in Connecticut? Was all the time and money spent on more than 3,000 proposed pieces of legislation worth the money spent by taxpayers?

 

u u u

 

The General Assembly is intended to be a part-time legislature. Yet, the budget of this lawmaking body has swelled more than 90 percent in the past 15 years. General state spending has increased about 66 percent during the same time. Granted, the budget of the General Assembly is a small part of the entire state budget, but it has nearly doubled from $35 million in 1998 to a hefty $67.3 million today. The size and complexity of the General Assembly and its staff, as well as the enormous maintenance of the facilities in Hartford demands review.

There are 187 members of the General Assembly — 36 in the Senate and 151 in the House. Part of the increase in the General Assembly budget is due to the greater number of "leadership positions" created — from 170 in 1998 to 214 now. The top leaders are compensated more than committee chairman, who are compensated more than "regular" lawmakers. Whether a legislator is "regular" or another designation is a technical word game that enables the legislators to increase their salaries without having a public vote to do so.

Legislative staff has increased from 334 to 435 full-time positions. The House Democrats employ 82 people at an average of $53,000 per year. Four of these positions are well over $100,000. The House Republicans has 40 employees at an average salary of $64,000. The Senate Democrats employ 72 people at an average of $59,000. The Senate Republicans have 39 employees at an average annual salary of $66,000.

 

u u u

 

It is in this context that legislators are thinking about permitting municipalities to impose fees for police services, fire protection and trash removal on some tax-exempt organizations, such as charities, hospitals and private schools that now are not taxed. How municipalities would calculate service fees is not clear. The vague legislation says the charges must be uniform and based upon the square footage of the tax-exempt property.

This is particularly alarming in light of all the services that not-for-profit organizations provide people in need. The need will only increase during this economic meltdown.

For example, the Connecticut Hospital Association reports that in 2008, 23 of the 28 not-for-profit hospitals in Connecticut did not collect enough money from patients to cover the hospital’s costs. This is because hospitals are required to care for sick people in emergency rooms regardless of their ability to pay. This is a good policy and the state of Connecticut supports this charity care by not taxing hospitals.

The Connecticut Conference of Independent Colleges reports that private colleges will cut back programs, jobs and construction plans because of the recession. In addition, endowments used to give financial aid have lost value, which will result in fewer college enrollees. All this will result in inevitable employee layoffs.

Fees required of organizations, such as the Y and other service organizations, will result in reduced child care and other programs that provide direct services to people.

 

u u u

 

There is a popular and relevant public policy that supports not taxing organizations that exist for charitable purposes: These organizations do not make a profit and they provide services and/or care for people who would otherwise not receive any. Society supports the efforts of non-governmental not-for-profits by exempting them from federal and state taxes. This should not change now.

As of January 2009, Connecticut’s unemployment rate grew to 7.9 percent. Torrington’s unemployment is 8.1 percent. Waterbury’s unemployment is the highest in Connecticut at 10.4 percent. More and more people need the services provided by not-for-profit organizations. It is short-sighted to tax entities that provide essential and necessary help for the growing number of Connecticut residents in need.

 

 

Charlene LaVoie is the community lawyer in Winsted. Her office is funded by the Shafeek Nader Trust for the Community Interest.

Latest News

A scenic 32-mile loop through Litchfield County

Whenever I need to get a quick but scenic bicycle ride but don’t have time to organize a group ride that involves driving to a meeting point, I just turn right out of my driveway. That begins a 32-mile loop through some of the prettiest scenery in northern Litchfield County.

I ride south on Undermountain Road (Route 41 South) into Salisbury and turn right on Main Street (Route 44 West). If I’m meeting friends, we gather at the parking area on the west side of Salisbury Town Hall where parking is never a problem.

Keep ReadingShow less
Biking Ancramdale to Copake

This is a lovely ride that loops from Ancramdale north to Copake and back. At just over 23 miles and about 1,300 feet of elevation gain, it’s a perfect route for intermediate recreational riders and takes about two hours to complete. It’s entirely on quiet roads with little traffic, winding through rolling hills, open countryside, picturesque farms and several lakes.

Along the way, you’ll pass a couple of farmstands that are worth a quick visit. There is only one hill that might be described as steep, but it is quite short — probably less than a quarter-mile.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taking on Tanglewood

Aerial view of The Shed at Tanglewood in Lenox, Mass.

Provided

Now is the perfect time to plan ahead for symphonic music this summer at Tanglewood in Lenox, Massachusetts. Here are a few highlights from the classical programming.

Saturday, July 5: Shed Opening Night at 8 p.m. Andris Nelsons conducts the Boston Symphony Orchestra as Daniil Trifonov plays piano in an All-Rachmaninoff program. The Piano Concerto No. 3 was completed in 1909 and was written specifically to be debuted in the composer’s American tour, at another time of unrest and upheaval in Russia. Trifonev is well-equipped to take on what is considered among the most technically difficult piano pieces. This program also includes Symphonic Dances, a work encapsulating many ideas and much nostalgia.

Keep ReadingShow less
James H. Fox

SHARON — James H. Fox, resident of Sharon, passed away on May 30, 2025, at Vassar Brothers Hospital.

Born in New York, New York, to Herbert Fox and Margaret Moser, James grew up in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York. He spent his summers in Gaylordsville, Connecticut, where he developed a deep connection to the community.

Keep ReadingShow less