Lawmakers should consider their own wasteful spending


The global economic crisis is hitting home. The Connecticut General Assembly is frantically looking for ways to provide other revenue sources for the state and municipalities. There are many bad ideas floating around that demonstrate an inability to consider the consequences.

For example, the General Assembly, itself a beneficiary of the go-go economic days when money seemed limitless, is looking to tax not-for-profit organizations that are a potential lifeline to thousands of Connecticut residents.

Before burdening these important not-for-profit agencies, the General Assembly should examine its own activities and spending. The Legislature last year drafted more than 3,300 pieces of legislation, of which 1,444 made it out of committee and 205 actually passed. Did we really need 205 more laws in Connecticut? Was all the time and money spent on more than 3,000 proposed pieces of legislation worth the money spent by taxpayers?


u u u


The General Assembly is intended to be a part-time legislature. Yet, the budget of this lawmaking body has swelled more than 90 percent in the past 15 years. General state spending has increased about 66 percent during the same time. Granted, the budget of the General Assembly is a small part of the entire state budget, but it has nearly doubled from $35 million in 1998 to a hefty $67.3 million today. The size and complexity of the General Assembly and its staff, as well as the enormous maintenance of the facilities in Hartford demands review.

There are 187 members of the General Assembly — 36 in the Senate and 151 in the House. Part of the increase in the General Assembly budget is due to the greater number of "leadership positions" created — from 170 in 1998 to 214 now. The top leaders are compensated more than committee chairman, who are compensated more than "regular" lawmakers. Whether a legislator is "regular" or another designation is a technical word game that enables the legislators to increase their salaries without having a public vote to do so.

Legislative staff has increased from 334 to 435 full-time positions. The House Democrats employ 82 people at an average of $53,000 per year. Four of these positions are well over $100,000. The House Republicans has 40 employees at an average salary of $64,000. The Senate Democrats employ 72 people at an average of $59,000. The Senate Republicans have 39 employees at an average annual salary of $66,000.


u u u


It is in this context that legislators are thinking about permitting municipalities to impose fees for police services, fire protection and trash removal on some tax-exempt organizations, such as charities, hospitals and private schools that now are not taxed. How municipalities would calculate service fees is not clear. The vague legislation says the charges must be uniform and based upon the square footage of the tax-exempt property.

This is particularly alarming in light of all the services that not-for-profit organizations provide people in need. The need will only increase during this economic meltdown.

For example, the Connecticut Hospital Association reports that in 2008, 23 of the 28 not-for-profit hospitals in Connecticut did not collect enough money from patients to cover the hospital’s costs. This is because hospitals are required to care for sick people in emergency rooms regardless of their ability to pay. This is a good policy and the state of Connecticut supports this charity care by not taxing hospitals.

The Connecticut Conference of Independent Colleges reports that private colleges will cut back programs, jobs and construction plans because of the recession. In addition, endowments used to give financial aid have lost value, which will result in fewer college enrollees. All this will result in inevitable employee layoffs.

Fees required of organizations, such as the Y and other service organizations, will result in reduced child care and other programs that provide direct services to people.


u u u


There is a popular and relevant public policy that supports not taxing organizations that exist for charitable purposes: These organizations do not make a profit and they provide services and/or care for people who would otherwise not receive any. Society supports the efforts of non-governmental not-for-profits by exempting them from federal and state taxes. This should not change now.

As of January 2009, Connecticut’s unemployment rate grew to 7.9 percent. Torrington’s unemployment is 8.1 percent. Waterbury’s unemployment is the highest in Connecticut at 10.4 percent. More and more people need the services provided by not-for-profit organizations. It is short-sighted to tax entities that provide essential and necessary help for the growing number of Connecticut residents in need.

 

Charlene LaVoie is the community lawyer in Winsted. Her office is funded by the Shafeek Nader Trust for the Community Interest.

Latest News

Jacob assumes leadership role at William Pitt Sotheby’s Litchfield Hills offices

Eddie Jacob was recently promoted to Assistant Brokerage Manager for four Litchfield Hills offices of William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty.

Photo provided

William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty has appointed Eddie Jacob as Assistant Brokerage Manager for its four Litchfield Hills offices, the company announced on Nov. 19.

In his new role, Jacob will support agents and help oversee operations in the firm’s Kent, Litchfield, Salisbury and Washington Depot brokerages.

Keep ReadingShow less
Winter sports season approaches at HVRHS

Mohawk Mountain was making snow the first week of December. The slopes host practices and meets for the HVRHS ski team.

By Riley Klein

FALLS VILLAGE — After concluding a successful autumn of athletics, Housatonic Valley Regional High School is set to field teams in five sports this winter.

Basketball

Keep ReadingShow less
Bears headline DEEP forum in Sharon; attendees call for coexistence, not hunting

A mother bear and her cubs move through a backyard in northwest Connecticut, where residents told DEEP that bear litters are now appearing more frequently.

By James H. Clark

SHARON — About 40 people filled the Sharon Audubon Center on Wednesday, Dec. 3, to discuss black bears — and most attendees made clear that they welcome the animals’ presence. Even as they traded practical advice on how to keep bears out of garages, porches and trash cans, residents repeatedly emphasized that they want the bears to stay and that the real problem lies with people, not wildlife.

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) convened the meeting as the first in a series of regional Bear Management Listening Sessions, held at a time when Connecticut is increasingly divided over whether the state should authorize a limited bear hunt. Anticipating the potential for heated exchanges, DEEP opened the evening with strict ground rules designed to prevent confrontations: speakers were limited to three minutes, directed to address only the panel of DEEP officials, and warned that interruptions or personal attacks would not be tolerated.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kent unveils two new 'smart bins' to boost composting efforts

Rick Osborne, manager of the Kent Transfer Station, deposits the first bag of food scraps into a new organics “smart bin.” HRRA Executive Director Jennifer Heaton-Jones stands at right, with Transfer Station staff member Rob Hayes at left.

By Ruth Epstein

KENT — Residents now have access to around-the-clock food-scrap composting thanks to two newly installed organics “smart bins,” unveiled during a ribbon-cutting ceremony Monday morning, Dec. 1.

Rick Osborne, manager of the Kent Transfer Station, placed the first bag of food scraps into the smart bin located at 3 Railroad St. A second bin has been installed outside the Transfer Station gate, allowing 24/7 public access even when the facility is closed.

Keep ReadingShow less