Latest News
An assortment of colorful kratom products line the shelves at The Smoking Ape Smoke Shop in Torrington.
Debra A. Aleksinas
NORTH CANAAN — As Connecticut considers listing kratom as a Schedule I substance, Northwest Corner providers report a quiet but clear rise in dependence and withdrawal.
At Mountainside Treatment Center in North Canaan, clinicians say many people underestimate the drug’s risks or misunderstand how it works.
“Many people assume kratom is a safe, natural alternative to opioids, but detoxing from kratom and 7-OH—its semi-synthetic potent derivative—can be just as complex,” said Jana Wu, director of clinical integration at Mountainside. “We’re seeing individuals struggle with dependence and withdrawal, often unaware of the risks.”
Her concerns reflect a growing unease among clinicians across Litchfield County who say kratom—sold in gas stations, convenience stores, smoke shops, and online—is increasingly used to manage pain, anxiety, or to self-taper from opioids, even as little is known about potency or long-term safety.
Mountainside, the region’s largest addiction-treatment provider, has reported a steady increase in kratom detox admissions. The center recently expanded virtual support groups and continues to warn about concentrated or synthetically enhanced kratom products marketed as opioid-like substitutes.
“Kratom needs to be classified as a Schedule I drug so others can avoid this pain and loss, especially our children. It’s called ‘gas-station heroin’ for a reason,” said Doreen “Dori” Pinkerton, a Mountainside staff member and self-described “kratom survivor.”
What is kratom?
Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a tropical tree native to Southeast Asia. Traditionally used in teas or chewed for mild stimulation, in the U.S. it is sold in capsules, powders, liquid shots and concentrated extracts—some containing amplified alkaloid levels or additives that differ significantly from natural preparations.
People use kratom for chronic pain, anxiety, coping with opioid withdrawal, or as an energy or mood enhancer. Risks include dependence, withdrawal, unpredictable potency, high concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine products, drug interactions, and respiratory depression when combined with sedatives. Kratom is not FDA-approved, and potency varies widely.
For many, kratom’s low cost and the perception that “natural” means safe are powerful draws, especially in small towns with limited healthcare options.
Local retailers say they try to offer guidance even as products vary widely in strength.
“I ask customers if [it’s] for pain, sleeping or anxiety,” said Mohammad Rahmen, an employee at Smoker’s Choice smoke shop in North Canaan’s Stop & Shop plaza. “It will only help if you use it with caution.”
A few towns away, Omar Nasser, owner of The Smoking Ape Smoke Shop on South Main Street in Torrington, described the range of products lining his shelves.
“Each strain has a different effect,” Nasser said. “The herbal powder form of kratom is addictive, but not as addictive as the stronger forms.” He said he recommends the lowest dosage based on customers’ needs. “It helps a lot of people in pain, although you do get attached to it — but not as much as some pain medications.”
Nasser said trends are emerging among his customers. “A lot of people use it to get out of withdrawal as well,” he said, noting that most of his buyers are between ages 30 and 50.
“There is always a reason for them to take it. From a human perspective, I try to talk people out of it if they don’t need it.” He added that some buyers are managing serious illnesses. “I have a lot of cancer patients, and it makes them feel better.”
As he spoke, a customer walked into the shop and headed straight to the kratom display area. Within minutes, she purchased a colorful packet of Jubi kratom tablets at $27.99 and a 300 mg packet of Pseudo for $44.99. Mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, or Pseudo, is a powerful compound derived from the natural alkaloids found in kratom.
While the customer declined to provide her name, she explained that the kratom helps with back pain from an automobile accident, and being two years sober, she preferred a more natural option in pain management.
Clinicians say those stronger, concentrated forms are exactly what concerns them.
“The problem isn’t just the plant — it’s the way modern products are manufactured and marketed,” according to Mountainside’s Wu.
Treatment centers
sounding the alarm
At High Watch Recovery Center in Kent, Dr. Andrew Rizzo, who specializes in addiction medicine, said kratom misuse has become increasingly common among patients seeking treatment.
“I’ve seen a steady increase in the number of patients who come to High Watch for kratom abuse,” Rizzo said.
He said many people begin using kratom believing it will ease their transition off opioids.
“People trying to get off opioids often turn to kratom,” he said. “But 7-OH is much more addictive, and withdrawal is pretty severe — similar to opioid withdrawal.”
The lack of regulation, he added, presents its own risk.
“How do they know what they are actually taking is really in the product? It could be something higher than the labeled doses,” Rizzo said. “There are people who think they are taking a safe alternative, when it’s taking them down the path of addiction.”
The McCall Behavioral Health Network in Torrington reports similar trends.
Kyle Fitzmaurice, McCall’s harm reduction coordinator, said more people are now seeking help specifically for kratom-related concerns.
“We are seeing an increase in folks coming in asking for support,” he said. “Often people assume natural kratom is safe, but ‘safe’ is always a questionable word,” he said noting that kratom is a plant. “But recently, there has been a shift toward more synthetic versions, like 7-OH and Pseudo. They’re not kratom.”
Some products are mislabeled, he said, which puts users at greater risk.
“What we’re learning is that some places are marketing them as kratom, and that is what causes the risk,” Fitzmaurice said. He encouraged consumers to read product packaging carefully. “People should be looking for accreditation by the American Kratom Association.”
Where Connecticut
stands now
Earlier this year, the state enacted a law directing the Department of Consumer Protection to determine kratom’s place on the controlled-substance schedule.
The DCP has since put forward a proposed rule, classifying Mitragyna speciosa and its extractsas a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD. Possession or sale would be illegal except for research. Retailers — including many small shops, gas stations and convenience stores across the Northwest Corner — would have to pull products immediately should it go into effect.
DCP is expected to make a final decision in the coming months.
State health officials warn that kratom can cause dizziness, confusion, drowsiness, hallucinations, depression, seizures and breathing difficulties, especially when combined with other drugs.
Wu said Mountainside’s mission is not to stigmatize, but rather to educate and support. “People deserve accurate information, safe treatment and a path forward.”
Keep ReadingShow less
The forested stretch along the Housatonic River near the Route 128 covered bridge in Cornwall forms a vital east–west wildlife corridor.
Debra A. Aleksinas
“This collaboration work is essential to ensuring that wildlife can move, adapt and thrive on our landscape, now and into the future.” —Tim Abbott, executive director, Housatonic Valley Association
CORNWALL — Efforts to ensure bears, bobcats, deer and other species can move safely through the Northwest Corner’s forests—and across its most hazardous roadways—are getting a boost, thanks to a $30,000 grant awarded to the Housatonic Valley Association (HVA) for its Follow the Forest initiative.
The grant, provided by the John T. and Jane A. Wiederhold Foundation, will support HVA’s ongoing work to safeguard key habitat linkages from the southern Hudson Valley north through Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York and Vermont. Much of that work centers on the Northwest Corner, where fragmented forests, busy roads and development increasingly threaten the ability of wildlife to travel between habitats.
The corridor, a mosaic of ridgelines, wetlands and deep woods, is used by everything from moose and black bear to bobcats, foxes, turtles and amphibians. Conservationists say maintaining safe passage for these species is essential not only for biodiversity but also for clean water, clean air and climate-resilient ecosystems.
“This collaboration work is essential to ensuring that wildlife can move, adapt and thrive on our landscape, now and into the future,” said Tim Abbott, HVA’s executive director. “We are deeply grateful to the John T. and Jane A. Wiederhold Foundation for its support of our Follow the Forest efforts.”
The foundation was created for the purpose of protecting and improving the welfare of animals of all kinds as well as the protection of wildlife, including endangered species, flora and fauna.

Training community scientists
Over the next year, the funding will allow HVA and its partners to expand science, planning and land-protection readiness efforts. That includes training community scientists to study wildlife movement at more than 60 forest linkages across western Connecticut and neighboring Massachusetts, coordinating conservation planning among local and regional partners, and developing a new “Connectivity Implementation Framework” to guide the shift from mapping to on-the-ground action.
Julia Rogers, HVA’s conservation director, said the initiative’s strength lies in its broad coalition. “Follow the forest brings together more than 50 partners, from local and regional land trusts to national organizations, united by a shared conservation vision.”
Local land trusts say the regional scale of the work is vital, especially in the Northwest Corner, where wildlife movement crosses both town and state boundaries.
Brian Hagenbuch, executive director of the Steep Rock Association in Washington, Conn., said Follow the Forest “gives us the tools to connect the dots, literally, between the places we’ve already protected, and the ones identified that still need our attention.
“Continued support for this work is a huge step that enables smaller organizations such as Steep Rock to collaborate on bigger landscape-scale preservation efforts that ensure wildlife can move safely and freely throughout our town and region,” he added.
HVA, which is the only conservation organization dedicated to the entire tri-state region, uses the Follow the Forest corridor map to guide land protection priorities, identify choke points where wildlife movement is threatened and highlight locations where easements or acquisitions could preserve safe passage.
Wildlife road-crossing hotspots
Conservation staff and volunteers working with the Follow the Forest initiative have identified several high-risk wildlife road-crossing zones in the region, many located where forest blocks are pinched by pavement, guardrails or development. Among the areas receiving increased attention:
Route 7, Cornwall Bridge to Kent:
A major north-south travel route for the black bear, bobcat and moose, with recurring reports of crossings near the Housatonic River. According to HVA, the narrow forested connection east-west across Route 7 is a priority for long-term connectivity planning.
Route 41 between Sharon and Salisbury:
A significant movement corridor for deer, bobcats and small mammals. Steep slopes funnel wildlife directly toward the roadway, producing seasonal spikes in collisions.
Lime Rock Station Road/Salmon Kill area, Salisbury:
Lowland wetlands attract amphibians and reptiles, especially during spring migration. Volunteers often monitor crossing nights to to assist spotted salamanders and wood frogs.
Route 44 between Norfolk and North Canaan:
A wide-ranging habitat connection where bear, coyote and occasional moose move between large forest blocks on Canaan Mountain and the Haystack Mountain region.
West Cornwall Road/Route 128 bridge area:
Forest on both sides of the Housatonic River creates a critical east-west linkage. Wildlife frequently attempts to cross road segments that narrow sharply near the bridge.
Keep ReadingShow less
A roadside sign that went up in July urging residents to back the ban on wake surfing at Lake Waramaug.
Photo by Alec Linden
A lake-use advocacy group is challenging Lake Waramaug’s newly approved wake-surfing ban, claiming the tri-town ordinance was adopted improperly and without sufficient evidence.
The Lake Waramaug Friends for Common-Sense Regulation group announced on Nov. 19 that it had petitioned the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to overturn its October approval of the ban and instead implement consistent statewide regulations.
The group said the ban, adopted by a joint vote in Kent, Washington and Warren on July 31, is “arbitrary, unreasonable and overly restrictive,” and unlawful because it “was realized based on insufficient evidence and without due process.”
Wake surfing is a slow-moving tow sport in which participants ride a boat-generated wave created by ballasts and weighted tanks.
Over the past decade, the activity has surged in popularity on lakes across North America, fueling regulatory disputes between supporters and critics.
Lake Waramaug is the second lake in Connecticut where voters have called for banning the sport.
The Lake Waramaug Friends group said the data used to shape the ordinance — drawn from a 2024 report by consulting firm Terra Vigilis — does not justify a full prohibition. That study examined the effect of large wake propagation on the lake bottom and found that wake boats operating in “surf mode” can move water down to 26 feet, potentially disturbing long-settled particles. But the report did not include a formal water-quality analysis to determine whether the sediment disruption actually harms the lake, a gap that opponents of the ban say undermines its environmental rationale.
Many long-time residents and lake users countered that any threat to the lake’s fragile health was enough to support the prohibition. During public hearings and meetings leading up to the vote, several speakers pointed to the lake’s well-documented period of poor water quality in the 1970s and 1980s, when it was largely unusable.
Others raised concerns about safety, saying large wakes have knocked kayakers off balance or shaken docks when wake-surfing boats pass. These reports, however, are anecdotal, and no formal safety study specific to Lake Waramaug has been conducted.
Lake Waramaug Friends and other opponents maintain that the concerns are overstated and that, without concrete water-quality data, there is no evidence to support an ecologically based ban.
The group also says it did not receive a public hearing after submitting its own set of proposed regulations to DEEP in June, accompanied by 80 signatures. It argues that the agency’s refusal violated state statute, rendering DEEP’s later approval of the ban invalid.
The group says that the approval sets a “troubling precedent: allowing municipalities to prohibit safe, legal activities without evidence of harm, while ignoring affected constituents and denying them meaningful participation in the decision-making process.”
The ban is scheduled to take effect in February, when DEEP publishes its updated Boater Safety Guide. DEEP has also commissioned its own study of wake-surfing impacts on Connecticut lakes, with findings expected that same month.
Keep ReadingShow less
Legal Notices - November 27, 2025
Nov 25, 2025
Legal Notice
Notice of Decision
Town of Salisbury
Planning & Zoning Commission
Notice is hereby given that the following action was taken by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Salisbury, Connecticut on November 17, 2025:
Approved—Special Permit Application #2025-0303 by owner Camp Sloane YMCA Inc, to construct a detached apartment on a single family residential lot in accordance with Section 208 of the regulations. The property is shown on Salisbury Assessor’s Map 06 as Lot 01 and is located at 162 Indian Mountain Road, Lakeville.
Any aggrieved person may appeal these decisions to the Connecticut Superior Court in accordance with the provisions of Connecticut General Statutes §8-8.
Town of Salisbury
Planning &
Zoning Commission
Martin Whalen, Secretary
11-27-25
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
ESTATE OF
CAMILLA D. CLONEY
Late of Salisbury
(25-00451)
The Hon. Jordan M. Richards, Judge of the Court of Probate, District of Litchfield Hills Probate Court, by decree dated November 13, 2025, ordered that all claims must be presented to the fiduciary at the address below. Failure to promptly present any such claim may result in the loss of rights to recover on such claim.
The fiduciary is:
Peter Y. Gevalt
c/o Carrie Z Michaelis
Goulston & Storrs, 730 3rd
Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10017
Megan M. Foley
Clerk
11-27-25
Notice of Decision
Town of Salisbury
Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
Notice is hereby given that the following action was taken by the Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of the Town of Salisbury, Connecticut on October 27, 2025:
Exempt -Application IWWC-25-75 by Elaine Watson for/to “Install a dock adjacent to the ordinary high-water mark of Lake Wononscopomuc. The proposed dock will be 4 feet wide and 45 feet long projecting into the lake, The dock will be assembled offsite and floated to the property location from the Town Grove where it will be secured by steel posts anchored into the lakebed. The dock will be positioned within one foot of the shoreline to provide stable and convenient access to the water”. The property is shown on Salisbury Assessor’s map and lot 47 11 and is known as O SHARON ROAD,. The owner of the property is WATSON PAUL SURV & ELAINE SURV.
Any aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the Connecticut Superior Court in accordance with the provisions of Connecticut General Statutes §22a-43(a) & §8-8.
11-13-25
11-20-25
11-27-25
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
ESTATE OF
SUSAN T. VERETTO
Late of North Canaan
(25-00428)
The Hon. Jordan M. Richards, Judge of the Court of Probate, District of Litchfield Hills Probate Court, by decree dated November 13, 2025, ordered that all claims must be presented to the fiduciary at the address below. Failure to promptly present any such claim may result in the loss of rights to recover on such claim.
The fiduciary is:
Jennifer Pierce
c/o Ellen C Marino
Ellen C Marino
596 Main Street
Winsted, CT 06098
Megan M. Foley
Clerk
11-27-25
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
ESTATE OF DAVID ARTHUR WRIGHT
Late of Salisbury
AKA DAVID A. WRIGHT
(25-00429)
The Hon. Jordan M. Richards, Judge of the Court of Probate, District of Litchfield Hills Probate Court, by decree dated November 13, 2025, ordered that all claims must be presented to the fiduciary at the address below. Failure to promptly present any such claim may result in the loss of rights to recover on such claim.
The fiduciary is:
Alison W. Lee
c/o Linda M. Patz
Drury, Patz & Citrin, LLP
7 Church Street,
P.O. Box 101,
Canaan, CT 06018
Megan M. Foley
Clerk
11-27-25
Keep ReadingShow less
loading









