Nader and other national politicians react to recent Supreme Court ruling

WINSTED — Consumer advocate and former presidential candidate Ralph Nader stopped by The Winsted Journal’s Main Street office last week on the heels of the Supreme Court’s controversial decision to overturn limits on corporate spending on political campaign advertising.

“This is historically one of the worst decisions the Supreme Court has ever made,� the Winsted native said. “This means that if there’s a weapons system that Lockheed Martin wants, they can write unlimited checks, or if the drug companies have a drug they don’t want Uncle Sam to negotiate lower prices on, they can buy off the government.�

Nader has been attacking unregulated corporate excesses for decades and said he would spend some time at home reading the full decision of the Supreme Court, which he said smacks of partisanship. The 5-4 vote was rendered along political ideological lines, with many Republicans celebrating the decision, while Democrats all the way up to President Barack Obama criticized the ruling as a radical decision in favor of special interests.

“This ruling opens the floodgates for an unlimited amount of special interest money into our democracy,� Obama said in his weekly radio address. “It gives the special interest lobbyists new leverage to spend millions on advertising to persuade elected officials to vote their way — or to punish those who don’t. That means that any public servant who has the courage to stand up to the special interests and stand up for the American people can find himself or herself under assault come election time. Even foreign corporations may now get into the act.�

Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd agreed with the president and Nader.

“What a terrible day for American democracy,� he said in a statement. “With this 5-4 decision, a deeply divided Supreme Court has essentially given corporations free rein to drown out the voices of the American people, rejecting the sacred democratic principle of ‘one person, one vote.’

“By overturning the century-old cornerstone of our campaign finance laws, they have opened the floodgates of direct corporate spending, allowing our political discourse and the legislative process to be further corrupted by huge corporations.

“I intend to pursue every legislative option — including a constitutional amendment to allow Congress and the states to put appropriate limits on campaign spending — to restore the trust and voice of the American people.�

Senators Russ Feingold (D-WI) and John McCain (R-AZ), sponsors of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, aka the McCain-Feigold Act, expressed differing levels of displeasure with the Supreme Court ruling, which overturned provisions in their legislation. Feingold called the ruling “a terrible mistake,� while McCain acknowledged disappointment.

The case in question, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, was originally brought to determine whether or not a political documentary movie critical of Hillary Clinton (“Hillary: The Movie�) could be considered political advertising and subjected to campaign spending limits. In ruling in favor of Citizens United, the court made broad changes to campaign finance law, striking down campaign rules related to corporations and unions, which the court said have the same rights as individual citizens.

Last week’s decision reverses a ban on issue advertising in the 30 days immediately before a primary and 60 days before a general election. The ruling allows corporations and unions to spend general treasury funds on ads naming candidates.

In Republican circles, reactions to last week’s ruling were celebratory, with conservative groups hailing the decision as a victory for free speech.

“For too long, some in this country have been deprived of full participation in the political process,� Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said in a televised statement. “With today’s monumental decision, the Supreme Court took an important step in the direction of restoring the First Amendment rights of these groups.�

Prior to his visit to The Journal, Nader released his own statement to the press, calling for a constitutional amendment to limit corporate campaign contributions.

“It is outrageous that corporations already attempt to influence or bribe our political candidates through their political action committees [PACs], which solicit employees and shareholders for donations,� he said. “With this decision, corporations can now also draw on their corporate treasuries and pour vast amounts of corporate money, through independent expenditures, into the electoral swamp already flooded with corporate campaign PAC contribution dollars.�

Nader reiterated last week during his visit to The Journal that he will continue to call for a constitutional amendment, but he also noted that too many people are not paying attention to the issue.

“Too many people are busy watching ESPN,� he said. “They’re not paying attention, and that’s what it all comes down to. When they hear the rumbles of people, they’ll start paying attention.�

Latest News

A scenic 32-mile loop through Litchfield County

Whenever I need to get a quick but scenic bicycle ride but don’t have time to organize a group ride that involves driving to a meeting point, I just turn right out of my driveway. That begins a 32-mile loop through some of the prettiest scenery in northern Litchfield County.

I ride south on Undermountain Road (Route 41 South) into Salisbury and turn right on Main Street (Route 44 West). If I’m meeting friends, we gather at the parking area on the west side of Salisbury Town Hall where parking is never a problem.

Keep ReadingShow less
Biking Ancramdale to Copake

This is a lovely ride that loops from Ancramdale north to Copake and back. At just over 23 miles and about 1,300 feet of elevation gain, it’s a perfect route for intermediate recreational riders and takes about two hours to complete. It’s entirely on quiet roads with little traffic, winding through rolling hills, open countryside, picturesque farms and several lakes.

Along the way, you’ll pass a couple of farmstands that are worth a quick visit. There is only one hill that might be described as steep, but it is quite short — probably less than a quarter-mile.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taking on Tanglewood

Aerial view of The Shed at Tanglewood in Lenox, Mass.

Provided

Now is the perfect time to plan ahead for symphonic music this summer at Tanglewood in Lenox, Massachusetts. Here are a few highlights from the classical programming.

Saturday, July 5: Shed Opening Night at 8 p.m. Andris Nelsons conducts the Boston Symphony Orchestra as Daniil Trifonov plays piano in an All-Rachmaninoff program. The Piano Concerto No. 3 was completed in 1909 and was written specifically to be debuted in the composer’s American tour, at another time of unrest and upheaval in Russia. Trifonev is well-equipped to take on what is considered among the most technically difficult piano pieces. This program also includes Symphonic Dances, a work encapsulating many ideas and much nostalgia.

Keep ReadingShow less
James H. Fox

SHARON — James H. Fox, resident of Sharon, passed away on May 30, 2025, at Vassar Brothers Hospital.

Born in New York, New York, to Herbert Fox and Margaret Moser, James grew up in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York. He spent his summers in Gaylordsville, Connecticut, where he developed a deep connection to the community.

Keep ReadingShow less