There's No 'Fair' School Aid Formula


November’s election ousting the Republican majorities in Congress was construed as a repudiation of the war in Iraq. In the last weeks of the campaign even some war supporters, like Connecticut U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman, started to sound as if they were dissatisfied with the military approach in Iraq and wanted the war ended.

President Bush responded to the election results by replacing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

But now that the Bush administration and members of Congress have ruminated on Iraq some more, the most likely new policy is an


increasein U.S. military forces there to mediate the Iraqi civil war and teach a little civilization to people for whom religious fanaticism and tribal hatreds are the very purposeof life.

 

Well, voters might be thinking, apart from Iraq there is still the prospect of reform in Congress, where the Republican majority had set records for corruption, pork-barrel spending and servitude to special interests.

 

Well, voters might be thinking, apart from Iraq there is still the prospect of reform in Congress, where the Republican majority had set records for corruption, pork-barrel spending and servitude to special interests.


u u u


But the other day, The New York Times reported about the "incumbent retention program" of the new Democratic majority in Congress, a plan for strengthening those new Democrats whose margins of victory were small. (Those freshmen include Joseph D. Courtney of Vernon, who ousted Republican U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons in Connecticut’s 2nd Congressional District by less than a hundred votes.)

"Those new members," the Times said, "are methodically being given coveted spots on high-profile committees, in particular the Financial Services Committee, a magnet for campaign contributions, and the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, a platform from which to send money for projects back home.

"Their names will be affixed as co-sponsors atop big-ticket measures on ethics and stem-cell research that are to be voted on in the first hundred hours of the new Congress, Democratic leaders said."

So there’s the Democratic congressional agenda — shake down the big financial interests for campaign contributions, restock the pork barrel, and wrap up the stink in new ethics legislation.

That was the


Republicanagenda too.

 

"Meet the new boss," The Who sang, "Same as the old boss."

Hilaire Belloc put it more elegantly, and maybe he wasn’t so cynical after all:

 

"Meet the new boss," The Who sang, "Same as the old boss."

Hilaire Belloc put it more elegantly, and maybe he wasn’t so cynical after all:


The accursed power which stands on Privilege

(And goes with Women, and Champagne, and Bridge)

Broke — and Democracy resumed her reign

(Which goes with Bridge, and Women, and Champagne).


u u u


 

Every year Connecticut state government tinkers with and puts more money into what it calls its education cost-sharing formula, which allocates state money to municipal schools. And every year every school system complains that the formula is unfair and doesn’t provide enough money.

Of course the only "fair" formula is one in which a municipality gets


allits school money from someone else and nobodywho gets the benefit of the money has to pay.

 

That is, there is no such thing as a "fair" formula.

Yet state government is gearing up to do it all over again in the impending session of the General Assembly, which will receive the report of a study group appointed by Gov. Rell, the Commission on Education Finance. The commission proposes raising state aid to municipal schools by 75 percent, another $1.2 billion — as if Connecticut really needed another study to discover that spending $1.2 billion more on municipal schools would be nice.

The historical complaint about Connecticut’s system of financing municipal schools, made 30 years ago in the Horton vs. Meskill lawsuit, was that it depended so much on the municipal property tax that poor communities, especially cities, could not afford decent education. While state government today finances only about 39 percent of municipal education, total school spending in Connecticut has exploded and the cities now get

 

That is, there is no such thing as a "fair" formula.

Yet state government is gearing up to do it all over again in the impending session of the General Assembly, which will receive the report of a study group appointed by Gov. Rell, the Commission on Education Finance. The commission proposes raising state aid to municipal schools by 75 percent, another $1.2 billion — as if Connecticut really needed another study to discover that spending $1.2 billion more on municipal schools would be nice.

The historical complaint about Connecticut’s system of financing municipal schools, made 30 years ago in the Horton vs. Meskill lawsuit, was that it depended so much on the municipal property tax that poor communities, especially cities, could not afford decent education. While state government today finances only about 39 percent of municipal education, total school spending in Connecticut has exploded and the cities now get

nearly alltheir school costs covered by the state and spend much more per pupil than the state average — and stillcity students perform as poorly as ever.

 

While school spending has little to do with student performance, Connecticut may be so dissatisfied with its school aid formula mainly because,

 

While school spending has little to do with student performance, Connecticut may be so dissatisfied with its school aid formula mainly because,

as a matter of law,it is almost impossible for increases in spending to help students. For Connecticut’s system of binding arbitration for public employee union contracts gives unions the first claim on any new money. No matter how much more is to be spent, under binding arbitration most new money is simply devoured by raises and benefit increases for current school employees.

 

And however Connecticut changes its school aid formula, 1) someone will be taxed more and feel slighted, 2) someone else will get to spend the extra money and still feel that it’s not enough, most of the money just being absorbed by the unions, and 3) nothing will change in educational results.

But the funding formula charade

 

And however Connecticut changes its school aid formula, 1) someone will be taxed more and feel slighted, 2) someone else will get to spend the extra money and still feel that it’s not enough, most of the money just being absorbed by the unions, and 3) nothing will change in educational results.

But the funding formula charade

doesaccomplish something. It precludes any discussion of those results.

 

 

 

 


Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer in Manchester, Conn.

Latest News

Love is in the atmosphere

Author Anne Lamott

Sam Lamott

On Tuesday, April 9, The Bardavon 1869 Opera House in Poughkeepsie was the setting for a talk between Elizabeth Lesser and Anne Lamott, with the focus on Lamott’s newest book, “Somehow: Thoughts on Love.”

A best-selling novelist, Lamott shared her thoughts about the book, about life’s learning experiences, as well as laughs with the audience. Lesser, an author and co-founder of the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, interviewed Lamott in a conversation-like setting that allowed watchers to feel as if they were chatting with her over a coffee table.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reading between the lines in historic samplers

Alexandra Peter's collection of historic samplers includes items from the family of "The House of the Seven Gables" author Nathaniel Hawthorne.

Cynthia Hochswender

The home in Sharon that Alexandra Peters and her husband, Fred, have owned for the past 20 years feels like a mini museum. As you walk through the downstairs rooms, you’ll see dozens of examples from her needlework sampler collection. Some are simple and crude, others are sophisticated and complex. Some are framed, some lie loose on the dining table.

Many of them have museum cards, explaining where those samplers came from and why they are important.

Keep ReadingShow less