Nothing new: Russia bullying a neighbor

I was a six-year-old first grader when the Robert Fulton Elementary School in North Bergen, New Jersey, held its first air raid drill in late 1939 or maybe early 1940.

The fire alarm bell rang and we marched out of Miss Phelps’s classroom and lined up in rows along the inside wall of the hallway. I can pretty well pinpoint the date because of a question I was asked by the little boy standing next to me:

“Who are you for,” he said, “the Russians or the Finns?”  And I quickly replied, “the Finns.”  He agreed, as did nearly every American.

We were talking about the brief, so-called Winter War between Russia and Finland, which began on Nov. 30, 1939, when the then-Soviet Union invaded its  smaller neighbor and ended on March 13, 1940, with the Finns agreeing to cede 9% of its nation, mostly border territory and offshore islands,  to the Soviets.

Russian dictator Josef Stalin claimed the land had been wrongly awarded to Finland after the 1917 communist revolution and was needed to defend Leningrad, 20 miles from the Finnish border, in the event of a war with Poland.

Does any of this sound familiar?

Russia expected to settle the dispute to its satisfaction within three days, but the Finns had other ideas. They mounted a fierce resistance, forcing the Russians to pay an unexpectedly high price for their victory, with roughly 150,000 Russians dead or missing to 25,000 Finns.

Before the invasion of Finland, communist Russia and Nazi Germany had signed a non-aggression pact that contained secret protocols creating specific spheres of influence in eastern Europe for each of the dictatorships. The goal was to allow each nation to conquer their neighbors without interference from the other, giving Germany Poland, for example and Russia, Finland.

So Russia went into Finland believing it would be able to replace its democracy with a puppet communist government while its partner, Germany, did the same to Poland.

But the Russian Army performed so badly against the determined Finns, Adolf Hitler decided to break the treaty and invade Russia by way of Poland, thereby extending the Third Reich’s influence across Europe’s greatest land mass.

The Ukraine-like courage of its people was not the only reason Americans greatly admired and rooted for Finland as it defended itself.

Throughout my childhood, I often heard my elders remarking that “the Finns always paid their debts.” We children were taught that this was an admirable practice, not only for individuals, but also nations.

Finland’s debt paying stood out following World War I when almost every Allied country emerged from the war seriously indebted to the United States for loans to finance their war efforts.

But when the Depression plunged nearly the entire world into a state of financial ruin, President Herbert Hoover decided to grant our former allies a one-year debt moratorium for 1932.

There’s no doubt the gesture was greatly appreciated, so much so, that in 1933, not a single country, except one, resumed its debt payments — from that year forward.

The exception, of course, was Finland because “the Finns always paid their debts.” The final payment was made in 1976.

Today, Finland’s border remains 20 miles from Russia’s second largest city, Leningrad, since renamed St. Petersburg. And Vladimir Putin is no doubt as fixed on that border as Stalin was in 1939. But Finland’s position in modern Europe is far different today.

Finland’s been in the European Union since 1995 and, for the first time in its history, strong public support is emerging for joining NATO. The same is true in more determinedly neutral Sweden.

They fear they may be next.

 

Simsbury resident Dick Ahles is a retired journalist. Email him at rahles1@outlook.com.

The views expressed here are not necessarily those of The Lakeville Journal and The Journal does not support or oppose candidates for public office.

Latest News

Kent moves closer to reopening Emery Park swimming pond

It may look dormant now, but the Emery Park pond is expected to return to life in 2026

By Alec Linden

KENT — Despite sub-zero wind chills, Kent’s Parks and Recreation Commission is focused on summer.

At its Tuesday, Dec. 2, meeting, the Commission voted in favor of a bid to rehabilitate Emery Park’s swimming pond, bringing the town one step closer to regaining its municipal swimming facility. The Commission reviewed two RFP bids for the reconstruction of the defunct swimming pond, a stream-fed, man-made basin that has been out of use for six years. The plans call to stabilize and level the concrete deck and re-line the interior of the pool alongside other structural upgrades, as well as add aesthetic touches such as boulders along the pond’s edge.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jacob assumes leadership role at William Pitt Sotheby’s Litchfield Hills offices

Eddie Jacob was recently promoted to Assistant Brokerage Manager for four Litchfield Hills offices of William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty.

Photo provided

William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty has appointed Eddie Jacob as Assistant Brokerage Manager for its four Litchfield Hills offices, the company announced on Nov. 19.

In his new role, Jacob will support agents and help oversee operations in the firm’s Kent, Litchfield, Salisbury and Washington Depot brokerages.

Keep ReadingShow less
Winter sports season approaches at HVRHS

Mohawk Mountain was making snow the first week of December. The slopes host practices and meets for the HVRHS ski team.

By Riley Klein

FALLS VILLAGE — After concluding a successful autumn of athletics, Housatonic Valley Regional High School is set to field teams in five sports this winter.

Basketball

Keep ReadingShow less
Bears headline DEEP forum in Sharon; attendees call for coexistence, not hunting

A mother bear and her cubs move through a backyard in northwest Connecticut, where residents told DEEP that bear litters are now appearing more frequently.

By James H. Clark

SHARON — About 40 people filled the Sharon Audubon Center on Wednesday, Dec. 3, to discuss black bears — and most attendees made clear that they welcome the animals’ presence. Even as they traded practical advice on how to keep bears out of garages, porches and trash cans, residents repeatedly emphasized that they want the bears to stay and that the real problem lies with people, not wildlife.

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) convened the meeting as the first in a series of regional Bear Management Listening Sessions, held at a time when Connecticut is increasingly divided over whether the state should authorize a limited bear hunt. Anticipating the potential for heated exchanges, DEEP opened the evening with strict ground rules designed to prevent confrontations: speakers were limited to three minutes, directed to address only the panel of DEEP officials, and warned that interruptions or personal attacks would not be tolerated.

Keep ReadingShow less