A modest economic proposal

About 30 years ago I was co-authoring a book with a CEO of a multi-million-dollar private company, and he informed me that he was going on the board of a larger public company at the behest of its two new controlling owners, clients of his, and that they had decided to take salaries of just $1 apiece per year and tie the rest of their compensation to rises in the stock price. Once the insider-trading window was closed, I bought the stock. After a year, the stock price had not risen enough to trigger the bonuses, and the board of directors decided that the next year the co-CEOs would take salaries of $1 million each, which I thought was perfectly fair; once again, they would earn considerably more if the stock price rose. It didn’t, and when the board decreed that in the third year the co-CEOs would get $10 million each, I decided it was time to sell. 

I tell this story as prelude to making a modest proposal: to cap American CEO salaries at a certain multiple of the salaries paid to their companies’ lowest-paid employees. 

Currently, many large-scale American employers have an enormously high ratio of the top manager’s salary to that of the floor-level worker in that company’s place of manufacture.  For example, Mary Barra of GM makes around $22 million a year, which­ — according to a company press release — is 281 times that of the median General Motors’ employee. If the median salary is $78,291, then the actual lowest-paid worker at a GM plant is likely being paid quite a bit less than that. And this, in a heavily unionized firm. 

A recent study of publicly held American firms shows that the “compensation ratio,” the top-salary-to-bottom-salary ratio, has risen about 1,000% since 1978. More than 100 American CEOs bring home $10 million or more apiece, many of them able to accumulate $100 million in five years. Another study shows that the CEOs of the top 3,000 firms (!) make an average of over $2 million apiece.  A third study, of 1,600 privately held American firms shows average CEO compensation at about the same level, that is, over $2 million per year. 

Does it have to be this way? Not at all. The ratio in the U.K. is 22, in France it is 15, and in Germany it is 12. (All other countries’ ratios are lower.) The average pay for a CEO in France is around €150,000, with the high end at €250,000. Bonuses keyed to accomplishments, and profit sharing, raise that compensation to €300,000. When France mandated a maximum top-to-median-salary ratio, there was a threatened exodus from the country of companies and headquarters, but that has not materialized. 

Now I am not someone who thinks CEOs don’t earn their high salaries. I co-wrote books with several CEOs who ran multi-billion-dollar companies, and was uniformly impressed at how hard they worked, and how much they did for their companies’ bottom lines. Sixty-hour weeks were the norm, and there was a tremendous amount of pressure to perform each and every day.

Let’s suppose we in America set a top-to-bottom ratio of 40, which is quite high historically but is regularly exceeded in the U.S.  If the lowest-level employee makes the minimum wage of $15 an hour, the CEO would make $600 an hour, which at 40 hours per week translates to $1,248,000 per year. 

Under this rubric, if a company wanted to bring up its CEO’s pay, it could do so easily by simultaneously raising the lowest-level salary, say, from $15 to $20- $25 an hour. A win-win situation. Actually, a win-win-win, because under such a ratio, stockholders would be assured that not too much of the company’s income would be going out to executive management salaries. Profits might actually increase, along with dividend payouts, since dividends are a prime way to add to the compensation of executives who have been given stock options.

How to do it? The ratio could be mandated federally, or if that is too difficult to accomplish politically, it could just become an executive-office policy guideline, extolled and labeled as socially-desirable. I can easily imagine there coming into existence an independent watchdog whose job would be to flag companies that do not observe the ratio and publicize those companies’ stinginess and their executives’ excess greed.   

I do not expect that if such a ratio were put in place in the U.S., that companies would suffer, or even that the CEOs would do so.  I do expect that lower-echelon salaries would rise, along with internal profit-sharing for those lower ranks, in order to meet the ratio and justify keeping CEO salaries in the stratosphere. 

 

Tom Shachtman is the author of more than a dozen American and world histories and of documentaries seen on all the major networks. He lives in Salisbury.

The views expressed here are not necessarily those of The Lakeville Journal and The Journal does not support or oppose candidates for public office.

Latest News

Housatonic lax wins 18-6 versus Lakeview
Chloe Hill, left, scored once in the game against Lakeview High School Tuesday, May 7.
Photo by Riley Klein

FALLS VILLAGE — Housatonic Valley Regional High School girls lacrosse kept rolling Tuesday, May 6, with a decisive 18-6 win over Lakeview High School.

Eight different players scored for Housatonic in the Northwest Corner rivalry matchup. Sophomore Georgie Clayton led the team with five goals.

Keep ReadingShow less
Troutbeck Symposium 2025: the latest chapter in continuing a vital legacy

Participating students and teachers gathered for the traditional photo at the 2025 Troutbeck Symposium on Thursday, May 1.

Leila Hawken

Students and educators from throughout the region converged at Troutbeck in Amenia for a three-day conference to present historical research projects undertaken collaboratively by students with a common focus on original research into their chosen topics. Area independent schools and public schools participated in the conference that extended from Wednesday, April 30 to Friday, May 2.

The symposium continues the Troutbeck legacy as a decades-old gathering place for pioneers in social justice and reform. Today it is a destination luxury country inn, but Troutbeck remains conscious of its significant place in history.

Keep ReadingShow less
Roaring Oaks Florist launches self-serve flower market

Terence S. Miller, owner of Roaring Oaks Florist in the new self-serve area of the shop.

Natalia Zukerman

Just in time for Mother’s Day, Roaring Oaks Florist in Lakeville has launched a new self-serve flower station next to its Main Street shop, offering high-quality, grab-and-go bouquets from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., seven days a week — including Sundays when the main store is closed.

Owner Terence S. Miller, who bought the shop 24 years ago at just 20 years old, calls the new feature “a modern twist on an old-school honor system,” with some high-tech updates.

Keep ReadingShow less