Letters to the editor - February 28 2013

 

The Lakeville Journal lacks objectivity

 

Now that my two Nov. 21, 2011, letters to the town employees have been published in the Journal and on the website www.salisburyrtc.org , no doubt there are many people wondering who is responsible for the “insulting, arrogant, condescending and vulgar” communication referenced in the longest of the letters. People have asked me to release the document over the past 15 months — some out of legitimate curiosity, some because they do not believe it exists. I did not release it before because I did not want to embarrass the Church of St. Mary or even the author of the communication.

 

The Town Hall employees seem to have forgotten that they instantly knew who it was when they first read my letter, finding that amusing right along with the other town employees. That being the case, I am now forced to reveal not only the culprit, but the offending text. It is worth noting that all the town employees almost to a man and woman named the person that caused the problem eliciting my expression of concern for them. Some admitted they had been on the receiving end of attacks by the very same official who had attacked me, confirming my suspicions.

 

Janet Manko’s new theory and methodology of professional reporting has been extended to her letters to the editor section. I have given her the offending email I received from Selectman Jim Dresser on Nov. 16, 2011, along with a letter to the editor containing the offensive part of the email. She went out of her way to hunt down Mr. Dresser. Touching in the extreme after her treatment of me two weeks ago. Dresser confirmed the email’s authenticity and stated he stands by it. 

 

On Tuesday at 10:45 a.m. Manko phoned me, refusing to print the text of the email, giving me 45 minutes to replace it with a letter simply describing the nature of it. She claimed to have been burned in the past by fake email submissions, while admitting she had confirmed this one with Mr. Dresser. Obviously this was a blatant move to rescue Mr. Dresser from the revelation of his obnoxious and vulgar email to me. It confirms that Ms. Manko and the Lakeville Journal are in the tank for the SDTC.

 

The complete email exchange between Dresser and I can be read and downloaded via links on my latest Selectman’s Commentary located at www.salisburyrtc.org. No doubt Mrs. Manko and her staff, along with the SDTC are praying most readers will not bother to go read the email exchange. I hope that most have the intellectual honesty to keep themselves accurately informed as to who in this town is truly divisive and who is being smeared by the local Democratic Party propaganda machine. 

 

 All of our Salisbury town employees can be assured again that I will not tolerate them being abused by selectmen or anyone else, and I am always happy to be of assistance to them.

 

Mark A. Lauretano

Selectman

Salisbury

 

 

Governor’s plan a real danger to Sharon Hospital

 

It is very disconcerting to me, and others with whom I have communicated, that the proposed taxes and cuts the governor plans to impose on the state of Connecticut’s hospitals, is not making news media headlines and causing an uproar from the entire populace. As a resident of Sharon and a proponent of Sharon Hospital, I will address the issue in light of our area’s plight. 

 

Sharon Hospital, the only for-profit hospital in the state of Connecticut, provides sundry services covering health care, employment, business for area merchants and generous donations to sundry nonprofits in the Tri-state area that it services. It provides the town of Sharon with about $320,000 in property taxes. The hospital is also a gathering place for many who enjoy the meals provided in the cafeteria at very reasonable prices. They have a state-of-the-art Sleep Center, Wound Center and Birthing Suites.

 

The following figures are central to the costs that are and will be imposed if the governor’s plan is allowed to proceed. These figures will impede the progress the hospital has made and, beyond wage freezes already in action, could cause more layoffs; not what is wanted by the hospital, employees or the community. According to Gov. Malloy’s proposal, state payments that assist hospitals covering the cost of caring for uninsured patients would be cut by about $550 million. The proposed reductions were preceded by cuts to hospitals of $103 million made earlier this year in an effort to close a deficit in the 2013 budget. Sharon Hospital has already faced a cut of about $411,000 in state aid and now stands to lose more than $2.5 million in the 2014-2015 budget.

 

Regardless of its for-profit status, Sharon Hospital still provides health care to uninsured patients and those on Medicaid. It is a 78-bed facility with about 420 employees from the Tri-state area, and is owned by RegionalCare Hospital Partners based in Tennessee. 

 

There are high standards practiced at the hospital as is reflected in the constant assessments made and patient care responses reviewed. 

 

Information regarding the above issue is being disseminated by the hospital. It would be wise for us to reach our own conclusions; we are all impacted by this issue in one form or another in all age groups. Please think about what would happen if the hospital had to close.

 

Janet Nickson

Sharon

 

 

Political oil and water don’t mix

 

I was most pleased to read last week’s editorial attacking Selectman Mark Lauretano. It’s refreshing to find journalistic neutrality cast to the side as the gloves come off and suppressed hostility from the editor can no longer be contained.

 

While the goal of the paper is “not to fight with politicians” (evidenced perhaps by across-the-board endorsements of Democrats?), might we have gone a tad too far in consistently misrepresenting Lauretano’s positions, forcing him to rebut Journal articles time and again? Because the editor characterizes Lauretano’s term in office as being one of “division and confrontation,” I would propose that the Journal follow up with an investigative article (getting both sides of the story) revealing the causes for that state of affairs.

 

Admittedly, Lauretano can be a trifle long-winded at public meetings and a stickler for integrity and protocol, but he is adhering to his campaign promises despite persistent opposition. To insinuate that Lauretano is following through on his pledge to bring a code of ethics to Salisbury as a self-serving ploy to gain re-election is speculative at best and certainly insulting. 

 

Lauretano comes to selectmen’s meetings in a coat and tie, serious about his duties, and prepared to discuss issues in a composed manner. Regrettably, at these meetings he has developed quite a following of local Democrats, anxious to make disparaging remarks (reinforced by subsequent clapping). Yes, Mr. Lauretano, I have been a friend of Bob Riva, and you are no Bob Riva. Oh, how we yearn for the days of efficient rubber-stamping, when things ran smoothly without questioning or proper oversight.

 

And while we are on the subject of Lauretano’s efforts to formulate an acceptable code of ethics, let’s review some facts. Because Lauretano was not interviewed, he and his wife had to rebut some allegations in the Feb. 14 Journal by placing an advertisement in the paper. Lauretano has been working on the code since he was elected, carrying out meticulous research, incorporating ideas used by other towns, and opening up his findings for criticism by those serving in town government and now by the town as a whole. The enforcement provisions in the Lauretano COE model concern many of us, but Selectman Dresser, for one, has opined that a code without enforcement is of little value.

 

Some people are completely missing the point in having an enforceable code of ethics. Ethical town officials, committee members and employees have nothing to fear, right? Just as a fire exit plan is prepared and posted for when it might be needed, so too a code of ethics should be in place to explain what actions are to be taken if ethical infractions occur.

 

Peter Becket

Lakeville

 

 

Obvious concerns with proposed code of ethics'

 

Mark Lauretano’s proposal for a town of Salisbury ethics code, together with an ethics commission with subpoena powers, presents two obvious concerns.

 

The first is that handing power of ethics commission appointments to the two major political parties in town and granting those appointees such empowerment, politicizes exactly that which should be nonpolitical. Speaking as a professional ethicist, that is upside-down logic for resolution of ethical questions. Resolution should be based on neutral analysis of the issue at hand.

 

The second concern, which has gotten lost so far in this discussion, is this: What is the recognized need for such a commission on the part of comparable communities in Connecticut?

 

In hope of advancing this discussion beyond its current embroilment in small-town bitterness, I thought it would be useful to examine what other towns in Connecticut with populations under 10,000 have done about an ethics code and/or an ethics board. It turns out that of the 69 towns in this category only 18 have ethics codes and only six of the 18 have ethics boards. The majority of these towns are two to three times our size, while only one is smaller. 

 

I then gathered information from either the town clerk, selectman or ethics board chair of each town. Several common facts emerged: First, all ethics board members were appointed by their Boards of Selectmen, (using majority/minority membership rules), NOT the town political parties. And second, only two of those boards, Redding and Oxford (pops. 9,250 and 9,821), have had a case in the last five years. Last year, these two towns each had one case, an example of which is a possible conflict of interest in town board or commission membership.

 

The fact is that we, the townspeople, already have in place two mechanisms with which to address a serious, alleged ethical or other violation by an elected official: our town meetings, and second, our ability every two years to vote someone out of office. We have also been blessed with a long history of good governance.

 

My hope is that we have a town meeting soon to vote on which code of ethics we want to adopt and let the will of the people end this sadly contentious issue.

 

Barbara Maltby

Lakeville

 

 

Cheering an accomplishment in North Canaan

 

Just up the road a bit lies a town I’ll not name, recently bestowed a magazine acclamation of America’s best town. Whether or not the proclamation accurately represents that particular township is indeed up to the townsfolk to ponder and trespassers to investigate.

 

However, having passed through, visited, grown up in, birthed in or known people of other places, I can assuredly counter that there are many fine quality hamlets to settle in.

 

Noteworthy and reason for this mention, is the understated and rather subdued town of North Canaan, quietly tucked in the Northwest Corner of Connecticut, without pretense, without grandstanding, without garishness, without the formality and dysfunctionality of trying too hard to win the hearts of passer-throughs.

 

And it is in this little town of North Canaan that a small group of girls guided by someone who could materialize dreams, banded together as cheerleaders under the North Canaan Elementary School banner, and despite being overwhelmed by schools of much larger enlistment and experience, presented themselves at this past Saturday’s “Chief Challenge Competition” at Nonnewaug High School in Woodbury, and came home with a trophy. Congratulations, girls!

 

Sunday papers were silent of this event and recognition, nevertheless NCES and North Canaan exhibited quality and the subtlest peek into what makes North Canaan so special. A school that incubates and nurtures young people to dream, then makes those dreams into something tangible, is a thing to be proud of.

 

Those of us participating in the dream recognize the potential and achievements of our school, our town, each and every day, envisioning an even brighter future.

 

I certainly proclaim this cheerleading team as America’s finest. We can wait for a magazine to discover the secret.

 

Wayne Farrington

North Canaan 

 

 

For our safety’s sake, restrict firearms

 

Some facts about the sale, ownership and regulation of firearms judged to pose an unusually potent danger to the general public:

 

In 1934, public outrage at gun violence by organized crime prompted the Federal government to enact the National Firearms Act, NFA (26 USC 580 et sec and as amended in 1986) to regulate the manufacture, sale, ownership and transfer of fully automatic firearms — machine guns.

 

The NFA, among other things, imposes a $200 excise tax on each machine gun not manufactured on behalf of the state or the federal government, a $200 federal excise tax on each transfer of a machine gun and a special occupational tax on people and entities engaged in the business of importing, manufacturing and dealing in machine guns.

 

In addition, the federal law requires: (1) all machine guns, except antiques, to be registered with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), (2) prohibits private individuals from transferring or acquiring machine guns except those lawfully possessed and registered before May 19, 1986, (3) requires anyone transferring a machine gun to get prior approval from the ATF and for the new owner to re-register such firearm, (4) bars interstate transport except with ATF approval, (5) requires the purchaser to pass the same background checks required for the purchase of any firearm. 

 

The possession of an unregistered machine gun carries with it a possible 10-year sentence and a $250,000 fine.

 

Note however: Under both federal and Connecticut state law it is not illegal for a private person, of any age, to own a machine gun, provided:  (1) The would-be purchaser or new possessor of a machine gun has filed an application “to acquire” a machine gun with the Connecticut Department of Safety (CDS); (2) the machine gun is registered with both the ATF and the CDS; (3) both the machine gun’s owner and the would-be purchaser are residents of Connecticut; (4) At the time of each transfer or sale the identification number of the firearm, the registration date and the name and address of the seller and the purchaser have been filed with the CDS; (5) The would-be owner of a machine gun has been fingerprinted and has presented CDS with two recent photographs.

 

The intent of state and federal machine gun regulations is not to prohibit ownership of a machine gun. The purpose of the law is to keep tabs on who has a machine gun and, at all times, where that machine gun is being kept. 

 

In light of the killing being done with assault rifles in America, is it unreasonable to require assault rifles be regulated in the same way as a machine gun?

 

Wm. Earl Brecher

West Cornwall 

 

 

Don’t restrict law-abiding citizens

 

I have spent the last several months reading about and discussing the Newtown shootings. I have viewed proposals from across the country. I do not understand the position of those opposed to me. The bait and switch began with cheap talk about mental health issues. To say that is now on the back burner is charitable. To those that criticize my statement, why is it the only issue heard is about restricting lawful purchase and use of firearms? Where is the governor’s impatience with that part of his triad? 

 

Why is the governor and the legislature photocopying the California proposals, as they did in 1992 when the first semiautomatic rifle ban was enacted. It named 92 specific semiautomatic rifles, based on “military style features.” Now, they want to “strengthen” a failed, bad law. How does that stop criminal activity? What of the politicians in foggy bottom, all seven of the Connecticut delegation? They routinely lie to the public about firearms and magazines, as do their minions across the nation. If a rifle is sold, by the manufacturer with a 30-round magazine, that would make it the standard magazine. High capacity would be something larger. As was demonstrated in Aurora, Colo., these aftermarket accessories do not function as intended. 

 

In all the proposals, the aim is to restrict the law abiding citizen. There is no mention of criminals. Universal Background Checks, however that is defined, do not apply to criminals. To undergo a background check, you must be truthful. If you are a criminal, that is a violation of your 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. That of course ignores the obvious, criminals do not obey the law. Interesting though, that this proposal cannot legally apply to criminals.

 

Since 1964, every 13 minutes, someone dies in this country from motor vehicle accidents. Where is the outrage? Gun free Chicago is once again averaging more than one homicide per day; not all are from firearms. It is estimated there are 90 firearms per 100 people in this country. I would venture that number is higher in our region. Based on the sheer volume of firearms, it is obvious the problem is not the firearm; rather, it is the criminal misuse of firearms. Why is lawful ownership being restricted?

 

My email address is Paul.Bartomioli@gmail.com. I invite readers to respond to my question: “How does repeating failed policies and laws reduce criminal use?”

 

Paul Bartomioli

Falls Village

 

 

Time for Salisbury to speak out

 

The last line of the Feb. 21 Lakeville Journal editorial (“How much is enough?”) shows that the Journal, like much of the rest of Salisbury, has had enough and is willing to speak out.

 

In reviewing Mr. Lauretano’s first 15 months, the Journal notes that “his tenure has been one of division and confrontation, and voters should remember that tone and whether they want it to continue to define Salisbury’s public conversation when they go to the polls in November.” Since Mark Lauretano was elected in November 2011, we’ve learned that his manufactured issues at the local level are no more rewarding than those of his Republican colleagues nationally. Time and energy has been siphoned off into political cul-de-sacs, preventing town officials from openly and fairly conducting the regular activities of town governance. Mr. Lauretano’s divisive and confrontational style has thrown a wrench into otherwise unbroken machinery and driven wedges between groups that have no historical conflicts.

 

It is time for this unpleasant and self-promoting political experiment to end and for Salisbury politics to return to normalcy. To that end, let us all remember that we (the voters) have the power to reject this division and confrontation when we go to the polls in November. It is our obligation to do so. 

 

John Hoffman

Sarah Zarbock

Lakeville

Latest News

Chion Wolf brings ‘Audacious’ radio show to Winsted with show-and-tell event
Nils Johnson, co-founder and president of The Little Red Barn Brewers in Winsted, hosted Chion Wolf and her Connecticut Public show “Audacious LIVE: Show and Tell,” which was broadcast on April 8, drawing a sold-out crowd.
Jennifer Almquist

The parking lot of The Little Red Barn Brewers in Winsted was full on Wednesday, April 8, as more than 100 people from 43 Connecticut towns — including New Haven and Vernon — arrived carrying personal treasures for a live taping of “Audacious LIVE Show & Tell.”

Chion Wolf, host and producer of Connecticut Public’s “Audacious,” and her crew, led by production manager Maegn Boone, brought the program to the packed brewery for an evening of story-driven conversation and shared keepsakes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Marge Parkhurst, the preservation detective

Marge Parkhurst with a collection of historic nails recovered from wall cavities during restoration work.

Photo courtesy of Marge Parkhurst/Cottage & Country Painting Company
Walls still surprise me. If you look hard enough, you can find buried treasure.
Marge Parkhurst

After nearly 50 years of painting some of Litchfield County’s oldest homes and landmark properties, Marge Parkhurst has developed an eye for the past—reading the clues left behind in stenciled vines, forgotten bottles and newspapers tucked into walls, each revealing a small but vivid piece of Connecticut history.

Parkhurst was stripping wallpaper in a farmhouse in Colebrook — the kind of historic home she has spent decades restoring — when she noticed something odd. Three layers of paper had already come off — each one a different era’s idea of decoration — and beneath them, just barely visible under dull, off-white plaster, a pattern emerged.

Keep ReadingShow less
Wings of Spring performance at the Mahaiwe Theater
Adam Golka
Provided

On Sunday, April 19, at 4 p.m., Close Encounters With Music (CEWM) presents On the Wings of Song at the Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center in Great Barrington.

The program focuses on Robert Schumann’s spellbinding song cycle Dichterliebe (“A Poet’s Love”), a setting of sixteen poems by Heinrich Heine that explores love, longing, and the redemptive power of beauty. Featured artists include John Moore, baritone; Adam Golka, pianist; Miranda Cuckson, viola; and Yehuda Hanani, cello.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

New climbing gym planned for Great Barrington

Photo by Alec Linden

A climber explores Great Barrington’s renowned bouldering areas, reflecting the growing local interest in the sport ahead of the planned opening of Berkshire Boulders.

Alec Linden

Berkshire Boulders, a rock climbing gym, is set to open in the Berkshires later this year, aiming to do more than fill a gap in indoor recreation — it could help bring climbing further into the region’s mainstream.

Its co-founders already have their sights set beyond the roughly 2,000 square feet of climbable wall planned for a site off Route 7, just north of downtown Great Barrington.

Keep ReadingShow less
Wind, tarps and trail wisdom: a day learning how to camp smarter

Mat Jobin teaches the group how to use a permanent platform to rig a tent. The privy and lean-to of the Appalachian Mountain Club’s Limestone Spring Shelter are visible in the background.

Alec Linden

A happy day on the trail all starts with a good night’s sleep the night before. That’s local trekking guide Mat Jobin’s mantra, and he affirms that a good night’s sleep is possible even if it has to be on the trail itself – with the right preparation, that is.

Jobin, of Simsbury, Connecticut, is a 16-year professional guide and the founder and owner of Reach Your Summit, an outdoor experiences company that promotes self-confidence and leadership skills through a variety of excursions and educational workshops in the forests of New England. On Saturday, April 11, Jobin hosted the inaugural Campsite Selection & Skills workshop just off the Falls Village section of the Appalachian Trail.

Keep ReadingShow less
Grandmother Moon: Wunneanatsu Lamb-Cason book talk in Torrington
Wunneanatsu Lamb-Cason (Schaghticoke/Ho-Chunk), an educator, traditional storyteller and author, will read from her new book Grandmother Moon, inspired by her grandmother, Indigenous educator Trudie Lamb Richmond, who lived on Schaghticoke land along the Housatonic River in Kent.
Provided

The story comes full circle when educator, traditional storyteller and author Wunneanatsu Lamb-Cason (Schaghticoke/Ho-Chunk) comes to Litchfield County to read from her new book, Grandmother Moon, inspired by her grandmother, Indigenous educator Trudie Lamb Richmond, who lived on Schaghticoke land along the Housatonic River in Kent.

On Saturday, April 18, from 2-4 p.m., the Torrington Historical Society at 192 Main St. will host the book talk and sharing of traditional stories.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.