Thank you!
Your support is sustaining the future of local news in our communities.

It's not an 'invasion,' but immigration needs attention

Article IV of the Constitution states that in addition to guaranteeing to every state a republican form of government, it also guarantees to “protect each of them against invasion.â€

By failing to secure our borders since 9/11, has the government failed to protect states like Arizona and therefore the entire nation against invasion? Not an invasion of illegal immigrants, but an invasion of those enemies who can and do cross the open borders along with them.

Of course, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had neither illegal immigrants nor terrorists in mind when they drafted Article IV. They were thinking of Red Coats streaming over the Canadian border or attacking from ships anchored off the Atlantic coast. And they surely couldn’t envision a time when a handful of men could seize airliners and kill thousands of Americans in minutes.

In 1994, Arizona (yes, Arizona) cited Article IV when it sued the federal government to recover a modest $121 million it said the state was owed to keep illegal immigrants in Arizona prisons. A federal appeals court threw out the suit, ruling Arizona — and California, which had joined the suit — were not being invaded by a hostile, foreign power. Three years later, the Supreme Court refused to consider Arizona’s appeal.

But on Sept. 11, 2001, our ideas about wars and invasions changed for all time when 19 al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four passenger jet airliners and crashed them into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field, killing nearly 3,000. Only the size of the invasion force made it different from the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that killed a similar number of Americans.

Sadly, the fact that unknown numbers of terrorists can be among the millions who illegally breach our borders has made no more of an impression on those elected to uphold the Constitution than it had on the pre-9/11 courts.

The House has passed immigration reform, but the last time the United States Senate, that most deliberative body, made a serious attempt to do anything about the 12 or 20 million undocumented immigrants already here and the millions more en route, was in 2007.

The bill, a thoughtful, bipartisan effort, combined upgraded border protection and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. It had the support of President Bush and prominent senators from both parties like Edward Kennedy and Lindsey Graham. Both Hispanic senators, Democrat Ken Salazar and Republican Mel Martinez, favored the bill, as did the two Arizona Republicans, John McCain and Jon Kyl, yet it failed.

It failed because it couldn’t attract the support of the party bases and special interests. It was attacked on the right as being soft on illegals, for granting “amnesty†to those who illegally came here seeking work and rewarding them for violating the law. Civil rights groups on the left attacked a guest worker program that they feared would create a permanent underclass of workers, and unions balked at the specter of nonunion immigrants competing for jobs. It was picked to death, failed four cloture votes and was abandoned, some say prematurely, by the Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who informed reporters, “the bill’s over with, the bill’s gone.â€

As David Broder recalled last week in The Washington Post, a disappointed Edward Kennedy asked those who killed the bill what they proposed to do next.

“What are they going to do with the 12 million who are undocumented here? Send them back to countries around the world? Develop a type of Gestapo here to seek out these people that are in the shadows?â€

Last month, Arizona adopted the Gestapo alternative and in doing so, got the attention of that great deliberative body once again. Leader Reid, who killed the 2007 bill before its time, now needs Hispanic voters to save his elective neck back home in Nevada, so he’s willing to try again.

But don’t bet on immigration reform succeeding this election year, no matter how dangerous ignoring it may be.

Dick Ahles is a retired journalist from Simsbury. E-mail him at dahles@hotmail.com.

Latest News

Slow fashion takes the runway at Stone Ridge Orchard

The organic runway at HVSFW puts sustainable style among the apple trees at Stone Ridge Orchard.

Jay Ballesteros

Fast fashion has made it possible to buy the latest trend almost as quickly as it appears on social media. The environmental cost, however, is anything but fleeting. Fashion production accounts for about 10% of global carbon emissions, consumes enormous quantities of water and energy, and an estimated 85% of textiles end up in landfills each year. Synthetic fabrics also shed microplastics when washed.

So what would happen if we slowed things down?

Keep ReadingShow less
Susan Schneider and the magic of marbling
Susan Schneider, owner of Shandell’s in Ashley Falls, in her studio.
Susan Schneider, owner of Shandell’s in Ashley Falls, in her studio.
It’s a joyful process. —Susan Schneider

A beautiful September morning found Susan Schneider of Shandell’s working in her Ashley Falls home studio, while linen cocktail napkins she had marbled the day before hung on a line outside her back door. Her helpers, dogs Daisy and Stubbs, are never far from her.

“Marbling,” Schneider explained, “the art of floating paint on a liquid and printing it on a medium, has been around for hundreds of years.”

Keep ReadingShow less

Through the lens of war

Through the lens of war

“Omaha Beach Rescue, D-Day +1, Normandy, June 7, 1944.” one of the best-known photographs of D-Day.

Walter Rosenblum

Longtime Norfolk resident Nina Rosenblum will present her award-winning documentary, “They Fight With Cameras,” on Saturday, Sept. 26, at 6:30 p.m. at the Norfolk Library.

The film tells the story of her father, decorated U.S. Army Signal Corps combat cameraman Walter Rosenblum.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

Brian Gersten finds the story in the overlooked

Filmmaker Brian Gersten

D.H. Callahan

At 6 p.m. on Saturday, Sept. 26, award-winning filmmaker Brian Gersten will screen four short documentaries at the David M. Hunt Library in Falls Village, exploring obscure topics such as a lingering territorial dispute between the United States and Canada, a nationwide toilet paper panic sparked by a late-night joke, the infamous “Balloon Boy” saga and the history of bowling in America.

The Chicago-raised, Millerton-based filmmaker has worked as an editor on feature-length documentaries like the cycling film “Enter the Slipstream” and Netflix’s profile on author Tom Wolfe, “Radical Wolfe.” In 2025, “Why We Dream,” a film he edited about bringing D-Day veterans back to the beaches of Normandy, premiered aboard the U.S.S. Intrepid in New York City. When it comes to directing, Gersten’s own interests focus more on the underappreciated and unremembered, as the four short films he directed will demonstrate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sharon artist takes top prize at Lime Rock art show
Muriel Stockdale, left, and judge Roger McKee during the awards announcement at the juried art show at Trinity Episcopal Church. Stockdale\u2019s \u201cKevin\u201d was the second place winner.
Patrick L. Sullivan

The annual juried art show at Trinity Episcopal Church in Lime Rock was won by Mi-Kyung Hwang of Sharon for “Wild Hazelnut from Eggleston.”

The winners were announced at the show’s opening reception at the church Friday evening, Sept. 18.

Keep ReadingShow less
From Woodstock to the Warner, Graham Nash is still singing for peace

Graham Nash brings a career-spanning retrospective to the Warner Theatre in Torrington on Sept. 30, joined by Todd Caldwell, Adam Minkoff and Zack Djanikian.

Misti Layne

Imagine stepping out onto a stage in front of hundreds of thousands of tired, wet and weary strangers with a lineup of songs they’ve never heard before. If you’re Graham Nash, who will perform with his current band at the Warner Theatre in Torrington on Sept. 30, you don’t have to imagine. You only have to remember.

The legendary Woodstock music festival was only the second concert Nash played with Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. David Crosby, Stephen Stills and Nash had already formed Crosby, Stills & Nash, releasing their debut album earlier that year. Theirs was a sound both new and nostalgic when it hit the scene in the late 1960s, and, thanks in part to the success all three members had had with previous bands, they instantly found a wide and willing audience.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.