It's not an 'invasion,' but immigration needs attention

Article IV of the Constitution states that in addition to guaranteeing to every state a republican form of government, it also guarantees to “protect each of them against invasion.â€

By failing to secure our borders since 9/11, has the government failed to protect states like Arizona and therefore the entire nation against invasion? Not an invasion of illegal immigrants, but an invasion of those enemies who can and do cross the open borders along with them.

Of course, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had neither illegal immigrants nor terrorists in mind when they drafted Article IV. They were thinking of Red Coats streaming over the Canadian border or attacking from ships anchored off the Atlantic coast. And they surely couldn’t envision a time when a handful of men could seize airliners and kill thousands of Americans in minutes.

In 1994, Arizona (yes, Arizona) cited Article IV when it sued the federal government to recover a modest $121 million it said the state was owed to keep illegal immigrants in Arizona prisons. A federal appeals court threw out the suit, ruling Arizona — and California, which had joined the suit — were not being invaded by a hostile, foreign power. Three years later, the Supreme Court refused to consider Arizona’s appeal.

But on Sept. 11, 2001, our ideas about wars and invasions changed for all time when 19 al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four passenger jet airliners and crashed them into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field, killing nearly 3,000. Only the size of the invasion force made it different from the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that killed a similar number of Americans.

Sadly, the fact that unknown numbers of terrorists can be among the millions who illegally breach our borders has made no more of an impression on those elected to uphold the Constitution than it had on the pre-9/11 courts.

The House has passed immigration reform, but the last time the United States Senate, that most deliberative body, made a serious attempt to do anything about the 12 or 20 million undocumented immigrants already here and the millions more en route, was in 2007.

The bill, a thoughtful, bipartisan effort, combined upgraded border protection and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. It had the support of President Bush and prominent senators from both parties like Edward Kennedy and Lindsey Graham. Both Hispanic senators, Democrat Ken Salazar and Republican Mel Martinez, favored the bill, as did the two Arizona Republicans, John McCain and Jon Kyl, yet it failed.

It failed because it couldn’t attract the support of the party bases and special interests. It was attacked on the right as being soft on illegals, for granting “amnesty†to those who illegally came here seeking work and rewarding them for violating the law. Civil rights groups on the left attacked a guest worker program that they feared would create a permanent underclass of workers, and unions balked at the specter of nonunion immigrants competing for jobs. It was picked to death, failed four cloture votes and was abandoned, some say prematurely, by the Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who informed reporters, “the bill’s over with, the bill’s gone.â€

As David Broder recalled last week in The Washington Post, a disappointed Edward Kennedy asked those who killed the bill what they proposed to do next.

“What are they going to do with the 12 million who are undocumented here? Send them back to countries around the world? Develop a type of Gestapo here to seek out these people that are in the shadows?â€

Last month, Arizona adopted the Gestapo alternative and in doing so, got the attention of that great deliberative body once again. Leader Reid, who killed the 2007 bill before its time, now needs Hispanic voters to save his elective neck back home in Nevada, so he’s willing to try again.

But don’t bet on immigration reform succeeding this election year, no matter how dangerous ignoring it may be.

Dick Ahles is a retired journalist from Simsbury. E-mail him at dahles@hotmail.com.

Latest News

Wake Robin Inn sold after nearly two years of land-use battles

The Wake Robin Inn in Lakeville has been sold for $3.5 million following nearly two years of land-use disputes and litigation over its proposed redevelopment.

Photo courtesy of Houlihan Lawrence Commercial Real Estate

LAKEVILLE — The Wake Robin Inn, the historic country property at the center of a contentious land-use battle for nearly two years, has been sold for $3.5 million.

The 11.52-acre hilltop property was purchased by Aradev LLC, a hospitality investment firm planning a major redevelopment of the 15,800-square-foot inn. The sale was announced Friday by Houlihan Lawrence Commercial, which represented the seller, Wake Robin LLC.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kent commission tackles Lane Street zoning snag
Lane Street warehouse conversion raises zoning concerns in Kent
By Alec Linden

KENT — The Planning and Zoning Commission is working to untangle a long-standing zoning complication affecting John and Diane Degnan’s Lane Street property as the couple seeks approval to convert an old warehouse into a residence and establish a four-unit rental building at the front of the site.

During the commission’s Feb. 12 meeting, Planning and Zoning attorney Michael Ziska described the situation as a “quagmire,” tracing the issue to a variance granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals roughly 45 years ago that has complicated the property’s use ever since.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kent P&Z closes High Watch hearing, continues deliberations

Kent Town Hall, where the Planning and Zoning Commission closed a public hearing on High Watch Recovery Center’s permit modification request on Feb. 12

Leila Hawken

KENT — The Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 12 closed a long-running public hearing on High Watch Recovery Center’s application to modify its special permit and will continue deliberations at its March meeting.

The application seeks to amend several conditions attached to the addiction treatment facility’s original 2019 permit. High Watch CEO Andrew Roberts, who first presented the proposal to P&Z in November, said the changes are intended to address issues stemming from what he described during last week's hearing as “clumsily written conditions.”

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

Kent committee to review Swift House options

The Swift House in Kent has been closed to the public since the COVID-19 pandemic. A newly appointed town committee will review renovation costs and future options for the historic property.

Alec Linden

KENT — Town officials have formed a seven-member committee to determine the future of the shuttered, town-owned Swift House, launching what could become a pivotal decision about whether Kent should invest in the historic property — or divest from it altogether.

The Board of Selectmen made the appointments on Wednesday, Feb. 11, following recent budget discussions in which the building’s costs and long-term viability were raised.

Keep ReadingShow less

Kathleen Rosier

Kathleen Rosier

CANAAN — Kathleen Rosier, 92, of Ashley Falls Massachusetts, passed away peacefully with her children at her bedside on Feb. 5, at Fairview Commons Nursing Home in Great Barrington, Massachusetts.

Kathleen was born on Oct. 31,1933, in East Canaan to Carlton and Carrie Nott.

Keep ReadingShow less

Carolyn G. McCarthy

Carolyn G. McCarthy

LAKEVILLE — Carolyn G. McCarthy, 88, a long time resident of Indian Mountain Road, passed away peacefully at home on Feb. 7, 2026.

She was born on Sept. 8, 1937, in Hollis, New York. She was the youngest daughter of the late William James and Ruth Anderson Gedge of Indian Mountain Road.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.