Proposed FOI consolidation raises a red flag

While newly elected Gov. Dannel Malloy has shown no desire to be secretive in his work running the state’s business, a troublesome component of his economic plan is raising red flags in local newsrooms, as it proposes merging the state’s Freedom of Information Commission (FOIC) with four other agencies to form a new Office of Government Accountability (OGA).Connecticut citizens are right to question this consolidation of services, which appears in Senate Bill 1009, “An Act Creating the Office of Governmental Accountability,” as it would make it more difficult to maintain a transparent government in Connecticut.Malloy’s plan combines the FOIC with the Offices of State Ethics, Contracting Standards, Judicial Review and State Elections Enforcement to create the new agency, in which one commissioner would be in charge of five departments. A deputy commissioner would be in charge of three operational branches — enforcement, public affairs and general business operations.The exact impact on FOIC in this scenario is not fully explained, but it is clear that the consolidation will result in staff reductions. By reducing FOIC staff and placing additional burdens on them by adding work from the other agencies, the governor’s plan reduces the effectiveness of the FOIC and makes it more difficult for citizens to obtain information in a timely fashion. As many as nine specialized FOI attorneys would be lost in the shuffle, while the remaining staff would take on an increased workload, sharing duties across the OGA.Clearly, the intent of the consolidation is to save money by eliminating duplication of jobs and services. It is estimated that the reduction in staff could save about $1 million, but representatives from the FOIC and other organizations have testified the savings would be negligible. Relocation costs, including new phone and computer systems for the newly consolidated department, would eat up most of the savings, according to FOIC Executive Director Colleen Murphy.Murphy added that consolidation will impede the effectiveness of the commission by stripping it of its independence. “Under the proposal, the head of the new agency would be a gubernatorial appointee, serving at the pleasure of the governor,” she wrote. “It is feared that this proposed change would critically impair the ability of the agency, as a whole and its subordinate divisions, to do their jobs impartially, objectively and in the public interest.”In written testimony to the state Legislature, the Connecticut League of Women voters also opposed the consolidation, pointing out that the FOIC and other citizen commissions currently select their own executive directors, but under the governor’s proposal, the director of OGA would be appointed by the governor. The office would immediately lose the crucial independence it needs to do its job properly, in an age in which government officials and their corporate counterparts need to be watched more closely than ever.Connecticut’s Freedom of Information Commission must maintain its independent budget and governance to work properly, and state legislators know it. Citizens should remind them that they know it, too.