In 2016, do we know what is the truth anymore?

 In the past few weeks, all of us have been faced with moral decisions of what to believe and what to not believe. And you may be thinking I am zeroing in on the Donald. But I am not writing just about him. What we are all faced with is a dilemma for all journalism in this age of viral media the likes of Twitter, Google, Tumblr, FriendFeed, Posterous, Identi, Plurk, BrightKite, FourSquare, Presently, Yammer, Ping, HuffPost, Facebook, Pinterest, LinkedIn and others. In all these sites you can get glimpses of fact, opinion dressed up as fact, fact dressed up as outrageous opinion (to boost circulation) and just plain “feelings” (as in “this is how I see it”).

For hundreds of years, journalism has relied on three legs to give you the reliable information you need to make decisions about your life. Like a three-legged stool, solid journalism is always stable when all three legs are checked and verified before putting it out as reliable fact to the public. That’s what you, the consumer, pay for. Leg one? Fact gathering (including witnesses and sources). Leg two? At least two independent sources of verification. Leg three? Editorial overview to ensure the gathered facts are either not a red-herring planted for some other purpose or that the facts serve the public purpose of the newspaper, radio or television (remember “All the news that is FIT to print”). 

In this viral media world, when anyone can post anything, the urgency to get ahead of the competition can cause corners to be cut drastically, and two of those legs quickly become woefully missing. Here’s a warning: Everything you read on the internet is likely to be completely wrong. Maybe not immediately apparent… wait for it, it will become so shortly.

Let’s take the Gawker “exposé” of PayPal founder Peter Thiel’s backing of the Hulk Hogan legal case against Gawker. This is a perfect example of the viral media world crying “foul” because Hulk Hogan had a financial backer who had an axe to grind against the so-called journalists at Gawker. 

Every TV and radio news station has referred to Gawker as a news outlet, giving them the mantle of real journalism. But are they really? The head of Gawker, Nick Denton, took a high moral tone on NPR on Thursday last week, claiming to be only a “small” millionaire, disadvantaged by Thiel’s bigger money. He went on to explain, pridefully, how Gawker has served the public interest (journalism’s claim to morality) by repeatedly unveiling matters of intense public interest, like when he felt it was “unconscionable” that Anderson Cooper’s sexual orientation should not be more widely known and that’s why “we outed him,” the same way they outed Thiel (and the connection is that Thiel is angry and paid to Hogan’s lawyers to get back at Gawker).

Really? Outing someone’s private sexual nature is in the public interest? Could it be of prurient interest to some, especially those who are bigots and therefore find such information titillating? Sure, the world is full of gossip mongers and devotees. But no one previously would consider such rubbish or such bigotry journalism at all. And the people who claim they are doing so in the public interest should be called out for it, the same way the Philadelphia Enquirer and several tabloid papers have been called out in the (long) past.

Ah, but the past is no more. This is a whole new, not-so-brave world where even serious journalists like David Folkenflik of NPR dare not ask questions, dare not challenge the likes of Gawker outing peoples’ private sexual desires. And how many of us have watched the Donald make bigoted, outrageous comments in one-on-one interviews and refuse to respond to follow-up questions or simply repeat the same bold-face nonsense again and again … no, wait, that’s the Twitter world, retweet something a million times and it does become the new reality. Most of the public thinks that anything repeated loudly and often enough must either make it true or contain the grains of truth. No, that’s not how real journalism works, or should I say worked. Most of what you are hearing these days is rumor, gossip, bigotry dressed up as fact — and where does the media get many of its “reliable sources?” As the CBS morning news team admits repeatedly every week, they read it on Gawker, Twitter, Google, Facebook and so on. Unfortunately the list of new journalism sources is endless, with an endless supply of nonqualified journalists. And their regurgitation of this nonsense increasingly undermines your ability to have any news source to rely on to help plan your life.

That’s what journalism is for, not entertainment, but the sharing of facts so you can plan your life. If life is now only to be built on rumor, gossip and nonsense, then you can kiss your future goodbye.

Peter Riva, a former resident of Amenia Union, now lives in New Mexico.

Latest News

Jacob assumes leadership role at William Pitt Sotheby’s Litchfield Hills offices

Eddie Jacob was recently promoted to Assistant Brokerage Manager for four Litchfield Hills offices of William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty.

Photo provided

William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty has appointed Eddie Jacob as Assistant Brokerage Manager for its four Litchfield Hills offices, the company announced on Nov. 19.

In his new role, Jacob will support agents and help oversee operations in the firm’s Kent, Litchfield, Salisbury and Washington Depot brokerages.

Keep ReadingShow less
Winter sports season approaches at HVRHS

Mohawk Mountain was making snow the first week of December. The slopes host practices and meets for the HVRHS ski team.

By Riley Klein

FALLS VILLAGE — After concluding a successful autumn of athletics, Housatonic Valley Regional High School is set to field teams in five sports this winter.

Basketball

Keep ReadingShow less
Bears headline DEEP forum in Sharon; attendees call for coexistence, not hunting

A mother bear and her cubs move through a backyard in northwest Connecticut, where residents told DEEP that bear litters are now appearing more frequently.

By James H. Clark

SHARON — About 40 people filled the Sharon Audubon Center on Wednesday, Dec. 3, to discuss black bears — and most attendees made clear that they welcome the animals’ presence. Even as they traded practical advice on how to keep bears out of garages, porches and trash cans, residents repeatedly emphasized that they want the bears to stay and that the real problem lies with people, not wildlife.

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) convened the meeting as the first in a series of regional Bear Management Listening Sessions, held at a time when Connecticut is increasingly divided over whether the state should authorize a limited bear hunt. Anticipating the potential for heated exchanges, DEEP opened the evening with strict ground rules designed to prevent confrontations: speakers were limited to three minutes, directed to address only the panel of DEEP officials, and warned that interruptions or personal attacks would not be tolerated.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kent unveils two new 'smart bins' to boost composting efforts

Rick Osborne, manager of the Kent Transfer Station, deposits the first bag of food scraps into a new organics “smart bin.” HRRA Executive Director Jennifer Heaton-Jones stands at right, with Transfer Station staff member Rob Hayes at left.

By Ruth Epstein

KENT — Residents now have access to around-the-clock food-scrap composting thanks to two newly installed organics “smart bins,” unveiled during a ribbon-cutting ceremony Monday morning, Dec. 1.

Rick Osborne, manager of the Kent Transfer Station, placed the first bag of food scraps into the smart bin located at 3 Railroad St. A second bin has been installed outside the Transfer Station gate, allowing 24/7 public access even when the facility is closed.

Keep ReadingShow less