Sharon’s past comes alive on cemetery stroll

Jake Fricker points out the symbology of the columns on this stone belonging to Isaac Hunt (d. 1822), which indicate Masonic affiliation.
Alec Linden

Jake Fricker points out the symbology of the columns on this stone belonging to Isaac Hunt (d. 1822), which indicate Masonic affiliation.
SHARON — Cemeteries are complicated places. Some head for the gravestones to mourn, others to enjoy a weekend stroll, and still others use them as scenic locales to contemplate time and history. They are somber, joyous, meditative and beautiful places, but they are also more than that, as Housatonic Heritage Walk through Sharon’s picturesque Hillside Cemetery on Saturday, Sept. 20 decisively demonstrated.
Studying cemetery inscriptions, and the story of the people behind them, is an act of respecting the history of a place, said Sharon Burying Ground (as it was formerly known) board member and veteran grave cleaner Jake Fricker. Fricker said the grave cleaning team, wryly called the “Hillside Stoners,” has cleaned somewhere between 1,500 and 2,000 stones, with some 3,000 left to go. Each one, Fricker said, is “a way to honor the dead and remember the dead.”
Saturday’s tour, which took place during stunning fall weather, was a veritable journey through the lives of Sharon’s long departed. The Historical Society’s curator Cooper Sheldon, assisted by Hillside Stoners and Historical Society board members Myra Plescia, Marel Rogers, BZ Coords and Fricker, led the group from headstone to headstone, recounting the lives both happy and sad, prosperous and poor of the residents of yore, some well-documented and others whose stories have been mostly lost to time.
The first stop took the group to the elegant stone of Rev. Cotton Mather Smith (d. 1806), who was ordained the third minister of Sharon Congregational Church in 1755. He went on to found the Sharon Literary Club in 1777, which is believed to have been the first club of its kind in the country.
Further ambling took the group to Dr. Jerome Chaffee’s burial site, who founded Sharon Hospital in 1909, before the procession arrived at Judson Bostwick’s stone.
“There you have Mr. Mousetrap,” said Myra Plescia as she idly picked lichen of the grave, which sat pale and proud under dappled shade from one of the cemetery’s many towering Norway spruces towering above.
Bostwick led a short but industrious life, dying from typhoid fever at the age of 42 in 1859. His most lasting contribution to Sharon — and the world — was an early version of a mousetrap that would enclose the animal in a wooden cage of sorts before it was presumably released later elsewhere.
This surprisingly humane version of the now-ubiquitous pest control contraption was the first to be manufactured and marketed broadly in the world, the members of the Historical Society claimed. While this is difficult to substantiate, a quick google search yields that the earliest patent dates for the far-crueler spring-loaded traps only start appearing years after Bostwick died.
Further down the hill, a cluster of gravesites hosting the Marckres family shows George’s stone, who was probably Sharon’s first resident photographer and founded a jewelry store.
A more somber interlude of the journey was a visit to a shady, nondescript portion of the cemetery far downhill, arrayed with a smattering of small, barely visible and headstones that each bear only a number. Sheldon explained that this section is marked simply as “paupers” in a layout map from the 1800s, and scant information regarding its inhabitants exists. One stone, which apparently marks a child’s grave, is overlaid with toys.
“It’s not much to look at but it’s one of the saddest parts of the cemetery,” said Sheldon.
A later stop brought the group to Sarah Juckett’s gravesite, who was an ailing wife and mother on West Woods Road and who apparently also “churned a heck of a lot of butter.” She lived a painful life, often resorting to the pain-killing qualities of laudanum before dying at 43 years old in 1888. She kept a detailed journal between 1878 and 1881 about farm life, which has been a valuable resource for the historical society.
“She rests in peace here,” said Rogers.
Grave cleaning is a constant, meticulous and delicate task, the members of the Hillside Stoners explained, but it helps keep the vibrant and surprising history of the town alive. The team uses lichen-eating biologic cleaners to do the brunt of the work, then do the fine tuning with a gentle brush.
The only type of brush that’s allowed, Fricker said, is one “that would clean your Lamborghini.”
With three thousand headstones to go, and older cleans needing updating, the group has a big task ahead. “We’re doing this until we become members of this place,” said Fricker with a chuckle.
State Sen. Stephen Harding
NEW MILFORD — State Sen. and Minority Leader Stephen Harding announced Jan. 20 the launch of his re-election campaign for the state’s 30th Senate District.
Harding was first elected to the State Senate in November 2022. He previously served in the House beginning in 2015. He is an attorney from New Milford.
In his campaign announcement, he said, “There is still important work to do to make Connecticut more affordable, government more accountable, and create economic opportunity. I’m running for reelection to continue standing up for our communities, listening to residents, and delivering real results.”
As of late January, no publicly listed challenger has filed to run against him.
The 30th District includes Bethlehem, Brookfield, Cornwall, Falls Village, Goshen, Kent, Litchfield, Morris, New Fairfield, New Milford, North Canaan, Salisbury, Sharon, Sherman, Warren, Washington, Winchester and part of Torrington.
MILLERTON — James (Jimmy) Cookingham, 51, a lifelong local resident, passed away on Jan. 19, 2026.
James was born on April 17, 1972 in Sharon, the son of Robert Cookingham and the late Joanne Cookingham.
He attended Webutuck Central School.
Jimmy was an avid farmer since a very young age at Daisey Hill and eventually had joint ownership of Daisey Hill Farm in Millerton with his wife Jessica.
He took great pride in growing pumpkins and sweet corn.
He was very outdoorsy and besides farming, loved to ride four wheelers, fish, and deer hunt. He also loved to make a roaring bonfire.
He was a farmer, friend, husband, father, son and brother. He will be missed by many.
He is survived by his father, Robert Cookingham, wife Jessica (Ball) Cookingham, daughters, Hailey Cookingham-Loiodice (Matt), Taylor Ellis-Tanner (Jimmy) and sister Brenda Valyou, as well as many cousins, nieces and nephews.
He is predeceased by his mother, Joanne (Palmer) Cookingham.
His daughter, Hailey, will always keep his legacy alive by their father-daughter antics, such as their handshake, nicknames and making “quacking noises” at each other.
Services/Memorials will be held at a later date.
The Kenny Funeral Home has care of arrangements.
Telecom Reg’s Best Kept On the Books
When Connecticut land-use commissions update their regulations, it seems like a no-brainer to jettison old telecommunications regulations adopted decades ago during a short-lived period when municipalities had authority to regulate second generation (2G) transmissions prior to the Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) being ordered by a state court in 2000 to regulate all cell tower infrastructure as “functionally equivalent” services.
It is far better to update those regs instead, especially for macro-towers given new technologies like small cells. Even though only ‘advisory’ to the CSC, the preferences of towns by law must be taken into consideration in CSC decision making. Detailed telecom regs – not just a general wish list -- are evidence that a town has put considerable thought into where they prefer such infrastructure be sited without prohibiting service that many – though not all – citizens want and that first responders rely on for public safety.
Such regs come in handy when egregious tower sites are proposed in sensitive areas, typically on private land. The regs are a town’s first line of defense, especially when cross referenced to plans of conservation and development, P&Z regulations, and wetlands setbacks. They identify how/where the town plans to intersect with the CSC process. They are also a roadmap for service providers regarding preferred sites and sometimes less neighborhood contention. In fact, to have no telecom regs can weaken a town’s rights to protect environmental, scenic, and historic assets, and serve up whole neighborhoods to unnecessary overlapping coverage and corporate overreach. Such regs are unique to every town and should not follow anyone else’s boiler plate, especially industry’s.
Connecticut is the only state that has a centralized siting entity for cell towers. The good news is that applicants must prove need for new tower sites in an evidentiary proceeding and any decisions have the weight of the state behind them. The bad news is that the CSC used to be far less industry-friendly and rote in their reviews, which now resemble a check list. There is an operative assumption at CSC that if an applicant wants a tower, they must need it, otherwise why spend significant money to run the approval gauntlet? This reflects a subtle shift over the years at CSC from sincere willingness to protect the environment toward minimal tweaking of bad applications with minor changes. The bottom line is that towns really cannot rely on the CSC to do all the work for them.
What CSC issues telecom providers is a “certificate of environmental compatibility” after an evidentiary proceeding (not unlike a court case) with intervenors, parties, expert witnesses, and the service provider’s technical pro’s sworn in and subject to cross examination. Service providers get to do the same with any opposition from intervenor/party participants – like towns and citizens -- and their experts. It’s an impressive process whose ultimate goal is the fine balancing between allowing adequate/reliable public services and protecting state ecology with minimal damage to scenic, historic, and recreational values. They unfortunately often fall short of their mandate – like approving cell towers with diesel generators over town aquifers -- evidenced by CSC only rejecting about five cell towers in the past 15-20 years.
The CSC was founded in 1972 and clarified its mission in the 1980’s to prevent the state from being carved up willy-nilly by gas pipelines, high tension corridors, and broadcast towers. With the sudden proliferation of cell towers beginning in late 1990’s, it became the most sued agency in Connecticut by both an arrogant upstart industry if applications were denied and by towns/citizens when bad sites were forced on them. CSC gradually formed a defensive posture that drives their decisions toward industry with deeper pockets and attorneys on retainer.
For citizens, nothing can wreck one’s day like the CSC. It behooves towns to protect what little toolkit they have, and understand the legal parameters of the CSC’s playing field. The CSC is not a “normal” government agency where municipal/citizen redress is based on logic and local support. Their process is largely immune to everything but specific kinds of evidence – like town regs with setbacks/fall zones, radio frequency transmission signal strengths, sensitive areas identified, and detailed wildlife inventory, among others.
There is a current cell tower fight involving two intervening towns -- Washington and Warren; both with good cell tower regs – over a tower site within 1200’ of a Montessori School, near Steep Rock’s nature preserves with comprehensive geology/wildlife databases that include endangered, threatened and special concern flora and fauna, on established federal/state migratory bird flyways, within throwing distance to a historic site capable of being listed on the Underground Railroad, and with an access road on a blind curve entering a state highway that will permanently damage wetlands, vernal pools, and core forests. There are well credentialed environmental experts, including Dr. Michael Klemens, former chair of Salisbury’s P&Z, as well as the former director of migratory bird management at the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and an RF engineer testifying to alternative approaches, plus three attorneys representing intervenors. It is the most professional challenge I have seen at CSC since Falls Village successfully mounted one that protected Robbins Swamps several years ago.
The hearing is ongoing, with uncertain results. To see what it takes today to stop an inappropriate tower siting, see Docket #543 under “Pending Matters” at https://portal.ct.gov/csc before removing local cell tower regs – the lowest hanging fruit that any town can possess in case it’s needed.
B, Blake Levitt is the Communications Director at The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council. She writes about how technology affects biology.