Wetlands commission passes new regulations

SALISBURY — The Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission voted to approve a long-awaited revision of its regulations after a brief public hearing on May 12.

Introducing the new regulations draft at the start of the hearing, Land Use Administrator Abby Conroy outlined the history of the IWWC, which began with the adoption of the Connecticut Inland Wetland and Watercourses Act in 1972, after which Salisbury created the Conservation Commission to enact the duties required under that statute.

Conroy explained that one of the major motivations to change the regulations was to reflect the IWWC’s separate “statutory responsibilities” from the Conservation Commission since the two were separated in 2020. The current regulations, which date to 2006, “still reflect the Conservation Commission as the entity responsible for the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act,” she said.

As outlined in the motion that passed May 12, the major objectives in changing the regulations were to “reflect a new Agency name, align with legislative updates, address concerns that the current upland review area does not adequately protect sensitive resources, remedy inconsistent and unclear terms, and to adopt a more user-friendly fee schedule.”

Altering the upland review area — the area near a wetland or waterbody in which development or construction activities may require review from the IWWC — is one of the more significant changes detailed in the revision, and has incited disagreement between the Commission, lakeshore property owners and the various lake associations in town, such as the Twin Lakes Association and the Lake Wononscopomuc Association.

Conroy said that Salisbury’s unique topography and relative lack of development have made the town a haven for many types of wetlands and watercourses, as well as the unique ecosystems and threatened and endangered species that call them home. As a result, she explained, the IWWC developed a “resource-based approach” which establishes different upland review areas for different types of wetlands or waterbodies, while the current regulations set a universal 75-foot upland review area.

Sensitive wetland habitats, such as fens or vernal pools for example, are given a 300-foot upland review area in the new regulations. “They really are unique resources to themselves; each one is facing different pressures and threats,” Conroy said.

The upland review area remains 75 feet for each named lake — Wononscopomuc, Wononkapook, Washining and Washinee — though Chair Vivian Garfein clarified that these numbers are not set in stone.

Should any lake association wish to alter its own number, she explained, it may petition to do so at a later date through a straightforward process.

A raised bill at the current legislative session in Hartford, known as House Bill 7174, has caused concern among residents and commissioners as to the future jurisdictional power of the IWWC. If passed, the new bill would require a minimum 100-foot buffer adjacent to any wetland or watercourse, which would “completely [change] the ballgame as far as jurisdiction goes,” explained Conroy at the IWWC’s April 14 meeting, a month before the hearing. That aspect of the law is scheduled to take effect on July 1 if approved, the same day the new IWWC regulations are set to be adopted.

At that same meeting, Garfein said that the Commission will just have to wait and see regarding the bill, which is currently awaiting House and Senate vote.

Latest News

Salisbury Housing Trust opens doors to future ‘land bank’ thanks to small parcel donation
“My legacy is going to be a beautiful river preserved, put into conservation, and an affordable housing lot. I have left my imprint on the community,” —Michael Klemens

SALISBURY — A 100-foot by 100-foot plot of land at 235 Housatonic River Road recently donated to the nonprofit Salisbury Housing Trust by landowner Michael Klemens is being hailed by affordable housing advocates as an example of how a little-known and often misunderstood state statute known as 8-30g can support affordable housing initiatives in town.

“We’ve been talking about this for years, getting residents to donate small parcels,” through Connecticut General Statute 8-30g, said Jocelyn Ayer, director of the Litchfield County Centers for Housing Opportunity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Splash down
Simon Markow

Steven Barber, of Cornwall, makes the leap out of the heat Tuesday, June 24, into the cool pool of Great Falls with Finn Scribner already enjoying the water.

Sharon considers switch to appointed town clerk

Sharon Town Hall is located on Main Street.

Leila Hawken

SHARON — The Board of Selectmen hosted an informational meeting with the public on Monday, June 24 to discuss a proposed ordinance that would change the town clerk position from an elected role to one appointed by the BOS.

As per an announcement on the town website, the switch is meant to allow the field of applicants to extend beyond Sharon residents, as well as attract candidates who may not wish to participate in the election process. The public notice said the move would protect the clerk’s job security, as there is no limit on repeating terms so long as the position’s requirements and standards are satisfactorily met.

Keep ReadingShow less
Water authority gives Wake Robin Inn applicants nod to proceed with project
Wake Robin Inn is located on Sharon Road in Lakeville.
Photo by John Coston

LAKEVILLE ­— During a brief meeting midday on Wednesday, June 25, the Salisbury Water Pollution Control Authority voted unanimously to approve the sewer specifications of the controversial proposed expansion of the Wake Robin Inn.

Pending WPCA approval has long been a potential roadblock for the applicant, ARADEV LLC.

Keep ReadingShow less