Qualified immunity has become a big obstacle to good police/community relations

A long with chokeholds, no-knock entries and other violent police tactics, there is growing consensus among both protesters and groups across the political spectrum that “qualified immunity” must be ended or rethought. As it stands, qualified immunity protects local law enforcement from being sued and prevents citizens whose constitutional rights have been violated by law enforcement from having their day in court. 

Ironically, the idea that public officials can be sued for violating the rights of citizens began with the Civil Rights Act, passed in 1871 to protect recently freed slaves from the Ku Klux Klan. Congress’s wording in the Act was clear: Every state official who causes a “deprivation of any rights” guaranteed by the Constitution and laws “shall be liable to the party injured.” Although Klan violence didn’t end, hundreds of Klansmen were fined or imprisoned for violence under the Act. 

Nearly a century later, in 1967, the Supreme Court introduced “qualified immunity” for those officials who could show they had acted in good faith.  Although intended as a modest exception to prevent frivolous lawsuits and financial liability, the case that had risen to the highest Court was prompted by black clergymen who had sued for a violation of their civil rights after being arrested for peacefully using a whites-only waiting room in a bus terminal. Thus, qualified immunity resulting from the “good faith” of an official became a new obstacle to those pushing for racial equality.

Qualified immunity was greatly expanded by the U.S. Supreme Court in a very different legal situation. A suit against Nixon and two aides had been filed by a whistleblower in the U.S. Air Force who had been fired after uncovering $2 billion in concealed cost overruns. Deciding that the subjective state of an official was too difficult to determine, in 1982, in Harlow v. Fitzgerald the Supreme Court eliminated the “good faith” argument. Instead, government officials would be shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct did not violate any clearly established statutory or constitutional rights knowable by a reasonable person.  

In 2009, the Supreme Court upped the ante, ruling that lower courts didn’t even need to consider whether a cop had used excessive force unless the same conduct in the same context had been shown in a previous case to be unlawful and unworthy of immunity. What this meant was that victims of brutality by police officers had to find an identical case where police officers had been held accountable. Since two cases are rarely exactly the same, qualified immunity has enabled public officials, and especially law enforcement, to get away with egregious conduct. At the same time it has created a legal Catch-22: Where a precedent doesn’t exist, the question of whether the police have broken a law remains undecided, which in turn ensures that the precedent doesn’t get set.

Over the past 15 years, the doctrine of qualified immunity has been increasingly applied to cases involving police use of excessive or deadly force. Not surprisingly, victims have generally not received their day in court. Moreover, of the 30 most relevant cases traveling up to the highest Court, the Supreme Court has only twice denied immunity. 

Some argue that reforming qualified immunity would lead to a surge in suits against law enforcement, with the police bankrupted by law suits, or that it would inhibit the police in performing their duty. But taxpayers, through their police departments, not individual police, pay for such lawsuits. Moreover, so long as qualified immunity reinforces the cycle of violence between police and minority communities, law enforcement will be deprived of the public trust they need to do their jobs safely and effectively.    

Prompted by weeks of national and international protest, both the Democrats and the Republicans have offered police reform bills. The Republican bill, already voted down, would have increased reporting on the use of force and no-knock warrants, provided incentives for chokehold bans and made lynching a federal crime, but left qualified immunity untouched. The Democratic bill, still to be voted on as of this writing, would ban both chokeholds and no-knock warrants, and would make police more accountable by restricting the use of qualified immunity. 

The question is whether, amidst our current legislative rancor, Congress will manage to change a law that licensed police to commit brutality and violence, while rendering citizens, particularly from minority communities, powerless to defend their own rights. 

 

Carol Ascher, who lives in Sharon, has published seven books of fiction and nonfiction, as well as many essays and stories.  She is trained as a spiritual director.

The views expressed here are not necessarily those of The Lakeville Journal and The Journal does not support or oppose candidates for public office.

Latest News

Club baseball at Fuessenich Park

Travel league baseball came to Torrington Thursday, June 26, when the Berkshire Bears Select Team played the Connecticut Moose 18U squad. The Moose won 6-4 in a back-and-forth game. Two players on the Bears play varsity ball at Housatonic Valley Regional High School: shortstop Anthony Foley and first baseman Wes Allyn. Foley went 1-for-3 at bat with an RBI in the game at Fuessenich Park.

 

  Anthony Foley, rising senior at Housatonic Valley Regional High School, went 1-for-3 at bat for the Bears June 26.Photo by Riley Klein 

 
Siglio Press: Uncommon books at the intersection of art and literature

Uncommon books at the intersection of art and literature.

Richard Kraft

Siglio Press is a small, independent publishing house based in Egremont, Massachusetts, known for producing “uncommon books at the intersection of art and literature.” Founded and run by editor and publisher Lisa Pearson, Siglio has, since 2008, designed books that challenge conventions of both form and content.

A visit to Pearson’s airy studio suggests uncommon work, to be sure. Each of four very large tables were covered with what looked to be thousands of miniature squares of inkjet-printed, kaleidoscopically colored pieces of paper. Another table was covered with dozens of book/illustration-size, abstracted images of deer, made up of colored dots. For the enchanted and the mystified, Pearson kindly explained that these pieces were to be collaged together as artworks by the artist Richard Kraft (a frequent contributor to the Siglio Press and Pearson’s husband). The works would be accompanied by writings by two poets, Elizabeth Zuba and Monica Torre, in an as-yet-to-be-named book, inspired by a found copy of a worn French children’s book from the 1930s called “Robin de Bois” (Robin Hood).

Keep ReadingShow less
Cycling season: A roundup of our region’s rentals and where to ride them

Cyclists head south on the rail trail from Copake Falls.

Alec Linden

After a shaky start, summer has well and truly descended upon the Litchfield, Berkshire and Taconic hills, and there is no better way to get out and enjoy long-awaited good weather than on two wheels. Below, find a brief guide for those who feel the pull of the rail trail, but have yet to purchase their own ten-speed. Temporary rides are available in the tri-corner region, and their purveyors are eager to get residents of all ages, abilities and inclinations out into the open road (or bike path).

For those lucky enough to already possess their own bike, perhaps the routes described will inspire a new way to spend a Sunday afternoon. For more, visit lakevillejournal.com/tag/bike-route to check out two ride-guides from local cyclists that will appeal to enthusiasts of many levels looking for a varied trip through the region’s stunning summer scenery.

Keep ReadingShow less