Patrick Trettenero named Executive Director of The Stissing Center

Patrick Trettenero in front of The Stissing Center in Pine Plains.
Natalia Zukerman
Patrick Trettenero in front of The Stissing Center in Pine Plains.
The Stissing Center in Pine Plains announced the appointment of Patrick Trettenero as its new Executive Director. Trettenero, a seasoned storyteller with a diverse career in theater, film, television, and executive leadership, brings a wealth of experience to the role. His impressive background spans multiple industries, including arts production, creative direction, and fundraising. Having recently stepped down as President of the Board, Trettenero intimately understands the needs of the arts center and will be a valuable asset as it continues to expand its offerings and influence in the region.
A New York-based artist, Trettenero has made his mark in various creative roles. He has worked as an award-winning producer, director, writer, and mentor, and has honed his skills on both sides of the Atlantic, with projects in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and the UK. Early in his career, he served as artistic director of Chicago’s Cloud 42 theater, directing the premiere of “Late Night Catechism” which went on to stages in more than a dozen markets across the U.S. and UK, including its six-year Off Broadway run at St. Luke’s Theater. His Broadway credits include investments in “Next to Normal,” “Hedwig and the Angry Inch,” “1984,” and “Kimberly Akimbo.” Trettenero also spent 20 years at NBCUniversal, leading the creative agency “Brandworks” and producing Emmy-nominated telethons, branded content, and marketing campaigns. Most recently, he produced his first Broadway show, “Here Lies Love,” and only a month ago, closed an off-Broadway show he produced called, “Kafkaesque.”
As President of the Board at the Stissing Center for the last three years, Trettenero was instrumental in the growth and development of the organization. Trettenero shared, “It was an amazing experience. I’m so glad I was able to contribute to the growth of the organization, but I needed to clear my plate to start a job search.”
Trettenero had his last board meeting as President in early December when, just a few days later, he got the call. “So, I get a call from the Board saying, ‘we’re going to make a change, would you do this?’”
After a few days of contemplation, he accepted the role, ready to focus on the future of The Stissing Center. “I really need to focus on the future,” he explained. “The board felt confident that I had the skills to take on this role, and I’m excited about what’s ahead.”
Gwen Greene, the new President of the Board, shared, “Patrick worked side by side with Brett (Bernardini) during the latter’s tenure and is admired, respected, and beloved by our Pine Plains community. Going forward, I have no doubt we’ll do great things together for the community, for the arts, and for the amazing family that the Stissing Center has helped create.”
Though the center will have a period of adjustment, Trettenero is optimistic about the challenges and opportunities his new role presents. “It’s going to take a little while, but things are starting to calm down already,” he said. “Every transition is challenging, but I’m motivated by the love I have for this town and its people.”
Trettenero is committed to continuing the momentum of growth and ensuring that The Stissing Center remains a vibrant cultural hub for Pine Plains and the surrounding area. He emphasized the importance of balancing offerings for local residents, weekend visitors, and tourists alike. “We’re not for everyone, but we’re for anyone. There’s always room at the table at The Stissing Center,” he said.
With the 2025 programming already in place, Trettenero is focusing on increasing visibility and fundraising efforts. The first major event of the new season, “Fire and Ice,” will launch the season and offer a sneak peek at the diverse artistic programming to come. “It’s a chance for us to celebrate the exciting year ahead,” he said.
As he takes on the role of Executive Director, Patrick Trettenero is focused on the long-term vision: stabilizing and expanding the facility, fostering community partnerships, and raising the funds needed to complete critical infrastructure projects.
“I’m excited, relieved, and yes, a little terrified,” Trettenero admitted with a smile. “I’m hoping that what I can do is continue the momentum of growth and development and then, in a few years, hand it off to someone else to come in with a new perspective and a new approach, but always with the same mission, with the same focus on serving this community and this region.” Trettenero added, “I know I don’t have all the answers and I don’t pretend I’m going to be here forever, but at least for the foreseeable future.”
NORTH CANAAN — The long-term effect of permitting industrial activity in a residential/agricultural zone was discussed by the Planning and Zoning Commission Monday, Sept. 8.
Commissioners reviewed an application from Ryan Foley, owner of R Foley Electric LLC, to rezone a 6.4-acre section of his property on W. Main St. for industrial use. The parcel is adjacent to the Transfer Station, and the remaining 48.19 acres of his property would remain residential/agricultural.
Chairman Mike O’Connor suggested that a special permit may be more appropriate than granting the zoning change.
“Switching to industrial opens up a whole gamut of what could be there,” said O’Connor. “What he has proposed is allowed in a residential/agricultural area with a special permit.”
Foley’s application did not include a specific plan for the parcel. Planning consultant Martin Connor said the change was to “allow the owners of that property to develop that section of property for industrial development.”
Commissioner Doug Humes noted the property may have to be subdivided prior to approving a change on a particular section of the land. Commissioner Peter Brown suggested consulting the town attorney Randy DiBella.
The matter was tabled to the October meeting.
Text change amendment
Prior to the regular P&Z meeting Sept. 8, a public hearing was held for a text change to a specific regulation. O’Connor explained the change, which was to add email as an acceptable form of communication for mining operators notifying the zoning enforcement officer of work outside of normal hours of operation.
The hearing was closed after two minutes with no comment from the public.In the regular meeting that followed, P&Z unanimously approved the text change.
During the public comment section of the regular meeting, Robert Sprague, who arrived after the public hearing was closed, spoke on the topic.
Sprague said he had previously filed complaints to the ZEO about mining activity outside of normal hours. Per Sprague, ZEO George Martin had not received prior notice of the work.
Sprague questioned why the regulations were loosened if operators are not actively following the rules.
“There was no even attempt to notify the officer until there was a complaint made. So how is that [text change] going to make it any better?” Sprague asked.
Standing, from left, HVRHS students Violeta Londono, Phoebe Conklin, Lainey Diorio, Zaira Celso-Cristobal, Lyla Diorio and Eliana Lang served guests at the HVRHS travel club’s dinner Friday, Sept. 12. Seated, Sue and Deron Bayer dined at the event.
SALISBURY — The annual wine dinner fundraiser for the HVRHS Travel Club took place at the White Hart Inn on Aug. 12.
Students attending this year’s trips to France/England and Australia/New Zealand helped set up tables and tents for the event. When the crowd arrived they served guests and mingled with sponsors to talk about their excitement for the upcoming experiences.
Luke Miller auctioned off Broadway tickets and weekends at vacations homes with the help of August Olsen who charmed the crowd.
The roof of the old train station on Ethan Allen Streethas been repeatedly hit by trucks in recent years.
SALISBURY — First Selectman Curtis Rand told the Board of Selectmen that the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is not willing to fund moving the old train station building on Ethan Allen Street in Lakeville. Nor is it interested in paying for a new foundation.
The selectmen have been discussing moving the building, which is awkwardly situated across from restaurants and near the approach to the town Grove. Truck drivers in particular have a hard time with it, as evidenced by the half dozen times the building has been hit in the last couple of years. The town currently has concrete barriers in front of the building.
Rand said SHPO is considering putting up $30,000 for a bid package for engineering plans to move the building and put in a new foundation.
Transfer Station update
Salisbury-Sharon transfer station manager Brian Bartram told the selectmen that three new trash haulers have appeared in town. The problem is the haulers are not bringing the trash they pick up to the transfer station.
He said he is working on getting in touch with the haulers and explaining that Salisbury and Sharon trash needs to come to the transfer station, and that residents who use these haulers are still obligated to purchase transfer station stickers.
Crossing guard
Rand said Salisbury Central School needs crossing guard(s) for the Lincoln City Road/Route 44 intersection. A couple of volunteers have been handling the job, but their term of service is up.
The position is paid.
SHARON — At the Sept. 10 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, residents weighed in on a proposed zoning amendment that would codify accessory uses for Sharon’s farms.
The regulation is meant to help farmers support their farming operations with supplementary income and is geared towards “sustaining the local agricultural economy and retaining the town’s rural character,” according to the regulation draft language.
The proposed uses available for special permit applications include year-round farm stores, farm-to-table dinners, wineries, breweries, farm product processing facilities, farm vacation stays and general indoor and outdoor events.
The draft stipulates that the proposed accessory use must be secondary to the primary agricultural operation of the farm, and the farm must be at least five acres and actively cultivated.
Some members of the public felt the language was dangerously vague and could allow for unintended consequences.
“This is way too general for what’s coming to this town in terms of development,” said Carol Flaton, voicing her concern that the loose definition of a cultivated farm could be abused.
Land Use Administrator Jamie Casey said that Sharon’s regulations are intentionally general to allow for greater collaboration between the applicant and the land use commissions during project design. It’s better when things are “a little bit vague,” she said, allowing applicants more breadth and room for creativity and working with the commissions to formulate the details. “These things are worked out at a meeting,” she said.
P&Z Vice Chair Betsy Hall pointed out that the requirement of the accessory use being secondary ensures that proposed uses overshadow the agricultural aspects of the property. “It’s not like we’re going to let a manufacturing operation open on the farm,” she said. “We’re talking about the working farmers.”
P&Z alternate Jill Drew concurred that “the vagueness is a feature, not a bug.”
Selectman Lynn Kearcher suggested that the minimal property size be greater than five acres, which Hall said the Commission would consider when it picks the discussion back up at the next meeting.
The Commission plans to discuss the issue of noisy chickens in residential areas at its Sept. 24 planning session. Casey announced that she had received a complaint from Sharon Valley Road resident Letitia Brazee about a flock of chickens at a neighboring property. Brazee wanted clarification in the zoning regulations as to what animals are considered farm animals and how a farm is defined.
The current regulations, last modified in June 2023, allow farms in any zone in Sharon providing the lot is three acres or greater. The term farm, however, is not included in the regulations’ list of definitions, and the only animals currently regulated for lot area are horses.
Further complicating matters is the state’s “Right to Farm” law, which exempts agricultural activity from being “deemed to constitute a nuisance” unless the municipality adopts an ordinance or regulation “to the contrary.”
Another situation in Kent involving complaints over roosters in 2024 found the town upholding its protections against agricultural nuisance claims.