Weather conditions spell ‘perfect storm’ for algae blooms

Photo by Peter Neely

SALISBURY – State and local health officials are warning people to avoid exposure to potentially toxic algae blooms in Litchfield County lakes and ponds, fueled by a recent confluence of unusually hot weather, flash downpours and drought.
“It’s the perfect storm,” said Robert Rubbo, director of the Torrington Area Health District (TAHD) which received notice in late August from the Twin Lakes Association (TLA) of concerning algae clumps massing in shallow coves around East and West Twin Lakes in Salisbury.
The lake association had preliminary samples analyzed and found that the masses contain traces of cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae. While cyanobacteria is harmless at low levels, at elevated levels certain toxins it emits can be harmful to pets, especially dogs, and to humans, particularly children.
“Ingestion is the biggest thing with blue-green algae, especially with pets, who drink a lot of water when they go in, and it could be deadly to them,” said Rubbo. “The toxins are dangerous even to humans if they are swimming and ingest a certain amount of water.”
According to health officials, blue-green algae blooms have raised concerns in Connecticut and across the nation because the organisms can produce an array of neurotoxins, liver toxins, cell toxins and skin irritants.
More testing needed to determine toxin types, levels
On Aug. 30, Grant Bogle, president of the Twin Lakes Association, said he was awaiting results of testing being conducted in conjunction with the association’s lake management company “to understand more about the specific level and type of toxins that may be present.”
In the meantime, said Bogle, as a precaution, the lakes association has alerted appropriate officials in Salisbury, the TAHD, and the state Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (DEEP).
“They were smart enough to test and sample and report it. This is a growing issue,” noted Larry Marsicano, a limnologist with AER, the lake management company hired by Twin Lakes Association.
“We’re seeing the filament more this year than we have in past years. There are lakes out there that are constantly trying to manage cynobacteria even in open waters.”
“It’s a fine line,” between trying to inform the public and not causing panic, said Chris Bellucci, assistant director of DEEP’s water planning and management division. He said his office received notification of the Twin Lakes blooms through samples and images submitted by TLA association member Peter Neely.
“We know about it and have reviewed the pictures, which indicate there are indeed signs of cyanobacteria,” the DEEP official confirmed in an Aug. 31 phone interview.
Should cell counts and testing determine high toxin levels at a body of water, particularly public swimming areas, then DEEP will post health alert advisories.
Always present, sometimes harmful
Blue-green algae blooms are not unique to Twin lakes. Every lake, said AER’s Marsicano, contains cyanobacteria. “It’s not like the new plague.”
“The Twin lakes and Lake Wononscopomuc [in Lakeville] are lakes that support different kinds of algae populations. You might be out there and see this big cloud of green algae, and there would be no issue associated with that and it’s usually done by late July,” Marsicano explained.
Marsicano said while the Twin Lakes are known to be “pretty clear,” particularly out in the open waters, “now we are suddenly confronted with this shift where blue-green algae masses are accumulating in the coves.”
No issues at Lake Wononscopomuc
Bill Littauer, president of the Lake Wononscopomuc Association, said blue-green algae has posed no problems at Lakeville Lake this summer.
“So far there has been hardly any, and of course we are a much deeper lake,” he noted. “It’s been windy almost all summer, so the wind breaks up algae and doesn’t allow it to accumulate on the shoreline.”
Nutrients from humans exacerbate the problem
Cyanobacteria, which often resemble scum, foam or a thin layer of paint on the surface of water and range in hues from green to bronze, are more likely when water is warm, slow-moving and full of nutrients, such as nitrogen or phosphorous. Nutrients enter the water when runoff from properties washes into lakes and ponds.
“It hasn’t rained in quite a while, and you have everything on the surfaces of lawns that have not washed away in quite some time. And then you get a big flash of rain and all of a sudden,” DEEP’s Bellucci said, an influx of nutrients flows into the lake, fueling blooms.
According to Rubbo at TAHD, heavy rains also contribute to increased bacteria levels, like E.coli.
State Sen. Stephen Harding
NEW MILFORD — State Sen. and Minority Leader Stephen Harding announced Jan. 20 the launch of his re-election campaign for the state’s 30th Senate District.
Harding was first elected to the State Senate in November 2022. He previously served in the House beginning in 2015. He is an attorney from New Milford.
In his campaign announcement, he said, “There is still important work to do to make Connecticut more affordable, government more accountable, and create economic opportunity. I’m running for reelection to continue standing up for our communities, listening to residents, and delivering real results.”
As of late January, no publicly listed challenger has filed to run against him.
The 30th District includes Bethlehem, Brookfield, Cornwall, Falls Village, Goshen, Kent, Litchfield, Morris, New Fairfield, New Milford, North Canaan, Salisbury, Sharon, Sherman, Warren, Washington, Winchester and part of Torrington.
MILLERTON — James (Jimmy) Cookingham, 51, a lifelong local resident, passed away on Jan. 19, 2026.
James was born on April 17, 1972 in Sharon, the son of Robert Cookingham and the late Joanne Cookingham.
He attended Webutuck Central School.
Jimmy was an avid farmer since a very young age at Daisey Hill and eventually had joint ownership of Daisey Hill Farm in Millerton with his wife Jessica.
He took great pride in growing pumpkins and sweet corn.
He was very outdoorsy and besides farming, loved to ride four wheelers, fish, and deer hunt. He also loved to make a roaring bonfire.
He was a farmer, friend, husband, father, son and brother. He will be missed by many.
He is survived by his father, Robert Cookingham, wife Jessica (Ball) Cookingham, daughters, Hailey Cookingham-Loiodice (Matt), Taylor Ellis-Tanner (Jimmy) and sister Brenda Valyou, as well as many cousins, nieces and nephews.
He is predeceased by his mother, Joanne (Palmer) Cookingham.
His daughter, Hailey, will always keep his legacy alive by their father-daughter antics, such as their handshake, nicknames and making “quacking noises” at each other.
Services/Memorials will be held at a later date.
The Kenny Funeral Home has care of arrangements.
Telecom Reg’s Best Kept On the Books
When Connecticut land-use commissions update their regulations, it seems like a no-brainer to jettison old telecommunications regulations adopted decades ago during a short-lived period when municipalities had authority to regulate second generation (2G) transmissions prior to the Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) being ordered by a state court in 2000 to regulate all cell tower infrastructure as “functionally equivalent” services.
It is far better to update those regs instead, especially for macro-towers given new technologies like small cells. Even though only ‘advisory’ to the CSC, the preferences of towns by law must be taken into consideration in CSC decision making. Detailed telecom regs – not just a general wish list -- are evidence that a town has put considerable thought into where they prefer such infrastructure be sited without prohibiting service that many – though not all – citizens want and that first responders rely on for public safety.
Such regs come in handy when egregious tower sites are proposed in sensitive areas, typically on private land. The regs are a town’s first line of defense, especially when cross referenced to plans of conservation and development, P&Z regulations, and wetlands setbacks. They identify how/where the town plans to intersect with the CSC process. They are also a roadmap for service providers regarding preferred sites and sometimes less neighborhood contention. In fact, to have no telecom regs can weaken a town’s rights to protect environmental, scenic, and historic assets, and serve up whole neighborhoods to unnecessary overlapping coverage and corporate overreach. Such regs are unique to every town and should not follow anyone else’s boiler plate, especially industry’s.
Connecticut is the only state that has a centralized siting entity for cell towers. The good news is that applicants must prove need for new tower sites in an evidentiary proceeding and any decisions have the weight of the state behind them. The bad news is that the CSC used to be far less industry-friendly and rote in their reviews, which now resemble a check list. There is an operative assumption at CSC that if an applicant wants a tower, they must need it, otherwise why spend significant money to run the approval gauntlet? This reflects a subtle shift over the years at CSC from sincere willingness to protect the environment toward minimal tweaking of bad applications with minor changes. The bottom line is that towns really cannot rely on the CSC to do all the work for them.
What CSC issues telecom providers is a “certificate of environmental compatibility” after an evidentiary proceeding (not unlike a court case) with intervenors, parties, expert witnesses, and the service provider’s technical pro’s sworn in and subject to cross examination. Service providers get to do the same with any opposition from intervenor/party participants – like towns and citizens -- and their experts. It’s an impressive process whose ultimate goal is the fine balancing between allowing adequate/reliable public services and protecting state ecology with minimal damage to scenic, historic, and recreational values. They unfortunately often fall short of their mandate – like approving cell towers with diesel generators over town aquifers -- evidenced by CSC only rejecting about five cell towers in the past 15-20 years.
The CSC was founded in 1972 and clarified its mission in the 1980’s to prevent the state from being carved up willy-nilly by gas pipelines, high tension corridors, and broadcast towers. With the sudden proliferation of cell towers beginning in late 1990’s, it became the most sued agency in Connecticut by both an arrogant upstart industry if applications were denied and by towns/citizens when bad sites were forced on them. CSC gradually formed a defensive posture that drives their decisions toward industry with deeper pockets and attorneys on retainer.
For citizens, nothing can wreck one’s day like the CSC. It behooves towns to protect what little toolkit they have, and understand the legal parameters of the CSC’s playing field. The CSC is not a “normal” government agency where municipal/citizen redress is based on logic and local support. Their process is largely immune to everything but specific kinds of evidence – like town regs with setbacks/fall zones, radio frequency transmission signal strengths, sensitive areas identified, and detailed wildlife inventory, among others.
There is a current cell tower fight involving two intervening towns -- Washington and Warren; both with good cell tower regs – over a tower site within 1200’ of a Montessori School, near Steep Rock’s nature preserves with comprehensive geology/wildlife databases that include endangered, threatened and special concern flora and fauna, on established federal/state migratory bird flyways, within throwing distance to a historic site capable of being listed on the Underground Railroad, and with an access road on a blind curve entering a state highway that will permanently damage wetlands, vernal pools, and core forests. There are well credentialed environmental experts, including Dr. Michael Klemens, former chair of Salisbury’s P&Z, as well as the former director of migratory bird management at the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and an RF engineer testifying to alternative approaches, plus three attorneys representing intervenors. It is the most professional challenge I have seen at CSC since Falls Village successfully mounted one that protected Robbins Swamps several years ago.
The hearing is ongoing, with uncertain results. To see what it takes today to stop an inappropriate tower siting, see Docket #543 under “Pending Matters” at https://portal.ct.gov/csc before removing local cell tower regs – the lowest hanging fruit that any town can possess in case it’s needed.
B, Blake Levitt is the Communications Director at The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council. She writes about how technology affects biology.