Will Connecticut Cover the Uninsured?


Connecticut’s state Senate Democratic leaders have gotten more real than anyone so far in pursuing medical insurance coverage for all.

The Senate Democrats propose to spend $450 million more per year to increase payments to medical providers for treating people with state-sponsored insurance and to expand eligibility for such insurance. This, the Democrats figure, would hasten treatment for thousands of people who now are being turned away because state payments are so much below market rates and would extend coverage to about half the estimated 260,000 people in the state who lack medical insurance — provided that those people or their parents cooperated.

Gov. Rell wants the state to organize the uninsured into a large and healthy pool that insurers will offer them a basic medical policy for $250 per person per month. But there is no hard evidence that any insurers


will offer a basic policy for that price, and there is much evidence that many of the uninsured cannot afford to pay $250 per month. They well may continue to gamble on their health and their children’s.

 

 


u u u


But if the Senate Democrats have offered more of a plan than the governor has, it is, as she notes, only half a plan, for the Democrats have not proposed how to pay for it. That price of $450 million annually, about 3 percent of the current state budget and about half the state surplus, is sure to increase every year. Further, as the governor notes, state government


already has reached the limit on spending allowed by the state Constitution,.

 

It is not much help to propose spending more to solve the insurance problem. It would be more helpful to

 

It is not much help to propose spending more to solve the insurance problem. It would be more helpful to

find that kind of money.

 

Before the Senate Democrats again start chanting "millionaire’s tax," a tax the governor is pledged to veto, they should remember that they already have promised the revenue from such a tax to "property tax reform" and a dozen other undertakings, and that a "millionaire’s tax" probably wouldn’t raise half as much as would be necessary to cover the uninsured as they have proposed.

The governor is right to be concerned about spending, which the Senate Democrats are not yet. And since the spending cap in the constitution was offered to the people in 1992, in exchange for their having accepted the burden of the state income tax the previous year, it ought to mean something, for the sake of the integrity of state government.

 

Before the Senate Democrats again start chanting "millionaire’s tax," a tax the governor is pledged to veto, they should remember that they already have promised the revenue from such a tax to "property tax reform" and a dozen other undertakings, and that a "millionaire’s tax" probably wouldn’t raise half as much as would be necessary to cover the uninsured as they have proposed.

The governor is right to be concerned about spending, which the Senate Democrats are not yet. And since the spending cap in the constitution was offered to the people in 1992, in exchange for their having accepted the burden of the state income tax the previous year, it ought to mean something, for the sake of the integrity of state government.


u u u


The best compromise might be for the governor and the Senate Democrats to launch a campaign to cut state spending by the cost of coverage for the medically uninsured — for both sides to proclaim that someone other than taxpayers should sacrifice on behalf of those who are living on the edge.

And where better to start than with Connecticut government’s own personnel, state and municipal employees, whose own medical insurance, pension and other fringe benefits are gold-plated and whose salaries are almost always far superior to the salaries paid for similar work in private industry?

Even as costs of state and municipal government increase substantially each year, most of the extra expense arises from increases in employee compensation, not from any improvement in public service. What is called "aid to local education," increased every year, is mainly reimbursement for increased compensation for school employees.

Connecticut’s system of binding arbitration for public employee union contracts gives employee compensation the highest priority in government and makes it what is so tediously called a "fixed cost" — a cost beyond ordinary democratic review and control. So ever since binding arbitration was enacted 30 years ago the highest ambition in government in Connecticut has not been to improve service to the public but rather to become a "fixed cost."

If Connecticut could suspend binding arbitration for a few years and freeze government employee compensation, all the medically uninsured could be covered without worsening state government’s already precarious financial position. That would be social justice.


 

Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer in Manchester, Conn.

Latest News

Cornwall board approves purchase of two new fire trucks following CVFD recommendation
CVFD reaches fundraising goal for new fire trucks
Provided

CORNWALL — At the recommendation of the Cornwall Volunteer Fire Department, on Jan. 20 the Board of Selectmen voted to move forward with the purchase of two new trucks.

Greenwood Emergency Vehicles, located in North Attleboro, Massachusetts, was chosen as the manufacturer. Of the three bids received, Greenwood was the lowest bidder on the desired mini pumper and a rescue pumper.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robin Lee Roy

FALLS VILLAGE — Robin Lee Roy, 62, of Zephyrhills, Florida, passed away Jan. 14, 2026.

She was a longtime CNA, serving others with compassion for more than 20 years before retiring from Heartland in Florida.

Keep ReadingShow less
Marjorie A. Vreeland

SALISBURY — Marjorie A. Vreeland, 98, passed away peacefully at Noble Horizons, on Jan. 10, 2026.She was surrounded by her two loving children, Richard and Nancy.She was born in Bronxville, New York,on Aug. 9, 1927, to Alice (Meyer) and Joseph Casey, both of whom were deceased by the time she was 14. She attended public schools in the area and graduated from Eastchester High School in Tuckahoe and, in 1946 she graduated from The Wood School of Business in New York City.

At 19 years old, she married Everett W. Vreeland of White Plains, New York and for a few years they lived in Ithaca, New York, where Everett was studying to become a veterinarian at Cornell. After a short stint in Coos Bay, Oregon (Mike couldn’t stand the cloudy, rainy weather!) they moved back east to Middletown, Connecticut for three years where Dr. Vreeland worked for Dr. Pieper’s veterinary practice.In Aug. of 1955, Dr. and Mrs. Vreeland moved to North Kent, Connecticut with their children and started Dr. Vreeland’s Veterinary practice. In Sept. of 1968 Marjorie, or “Mike” as she wished to be called, took a “part-time job” at the South Kent School.She retired from South Kent 23 years later on Sept. 1, 1991.Aside from office help and bookkeeping she was secretary to the Headmaster and also taught Public Speaking and Typing.In other times she worked as an assistant to the Town Clerk in Kent, an office worker and receptionist at Ewald Instruments Corp. and as a volunteer at the Kent Library.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rafael A. Porro

SALISBURY -— Rafael A. Porro, 88, of 4 Undermountain Road, passed away Jan. 6, 2026, at Sharon Hospital. Rafael was born on April 19, 1937 in Camaguey, Cuba the son of Jose Rafael Porro and Clemencia Molina de Porro. He graduated from the Englewood School for Boys in Englewood, New Jersey and attended Columbia University School of General Studies. Rafael retired as a law library clerk from the law firm of Curtis, Mallet Prevost in 2002 and came to live in Salisbury to be nearer to his sister, Chany Wells.

Rafael is survived by his sister, Chany Wells, his nephew Conrad Wells (Gillian), and by numerous cousins in North Carolina, Florida, Wyoming, Arizona, Cuba and Canada. He was the eldest of the cousins and acknowledged family historian. He will be greatly missed.

Keep ReadingShow less