Without the proof, the rig is up

Every presidential election tends to follow a somewhat predictable pattern. As the candidates battle it out we, the voting public, take stock of what’s on offer and decide who to support based on a mix of policy, party and personality. The closer we get to Election Day the more we worry about everything from an unwanted “October Surprise” to what undecided voters will ultimately decide to which polls we should believe. The one thing we’ve never had to worry about—until now—is that the loser might refuse to accept the results of a fair and free election.

This new ‘normal’ would have been unthinkable a decade ago. How did we get here? There are plenty of theories (and culprits) to go around but that’s a topic for another day. The more pressing issue, as Nov. 5 fast approaches, is to debunk the myth that election fraud is widespread because failing to do so threatens the very foundation of our democracy.

Our election system is extremely decentralized, a feature that can be maddening at times (who, in Connecticut, doesn’t remember trying to understand what a hanging chad was 2000?). But this fragmentation does have its benefits, primary among them is that it makes conspiring to rig an election impossible. Other than enacting laws to protect the right to vote, the federal government has little to do with administering elections. Rather, the vast majority of election law is written (and enforced) at the state level. The states, in turn, rely on over 10,000 local jurisdictions across the country to administer elections, using a mix of paid staff and volunteers to maintain accurate voter rolls, mail out ballots, monitor the polls, count votes and certify the results. While election laws vary from state to state, they all include protective measures designed to ensure the process is secure, including strictly limiting access to ballots and keeping all election-related machines offline.

Has this combination of decentralization and protective measures worked? According to every organization that monitors election fraud, the answer is an unequivocal “yes”. Even the uber conservative Heritage Foundation, which maintains a database to track voter fraud, found that of 3 billion votes cast in federal elections since 2016, the percentage of fraudulent votes amounted to a miniscule .0000367.

The presidential election of 2020 was no different and, despite constant cries of a ‘rigged election’, no proof of widespread fraud has ever been found.

Trump’s legal team lost 60 of 61 court cases, with 50 of the cases being summarily dismissed due to lack of evidence. Even judges appointed by Trump were unimpressed with the arguments being presented and ruled accordingly. The lawsuits were so egregiously frivolous a number of his attorneys faced professional consequences, most notably Rudy Guilianni, who was disbarred.

Christopher Krebs, the Trump-appointed Director of CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency), was fired in November 2020 after repeatedly telling Trump there was no evidence of widespread fraud. When Krebs went before the Senate he testified, under oath, that the 2020 election was “the most secure in American history”.

Following the 2020 election, Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic — repeated targets of the Trump team’s claim of election fraud — sued various news outlets for defamation. Fox News had to pay Dominion $787.5 million in damages and Newsmax, eager to avoid an embarrassing trial, settled with Smartmatic for an undisclosed sum.

Recounts were conducted at the behest of Trump’s campaign in a number of swing states. Georgia’s three recounts confirmed Trump’s loss. Arizona allowed an outside firm with deep ties to the Republican party, Cyber Ninjas, to do a statewide recount, resulting in a net increase of 360 votes for Biden. Wisconsin did partial recounts in two counties and this, too, resulted in a net gain for Biden, adding 87 votes to his total.

It seems these days everyone feels entitled to their own facts, particularly with the fragmentation of media and the deluge of ‘information’ on social media platforms like X. But hard evidence, especially when it’s based on testimony given under oath, still matters. As do numbers. And all of the hard evidence and numbers that were litigated after the 2020 election prove there was no widespread voter fraud. Period.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem the story will end there. Trump and his allies are already laying the groundwork for the same unfounded lies about a rigged election if he loses again. This dishonesty should worry us all, even those who voted for Trump in 2020 and plan to do so again. Democracy depends on fair and free elections but it also depends on a shared reality and Trump’s “Big Lie” is inflicting lasting damage on both. If we value what makes America great, we need to hold sacred the ritual of casting a vote and, equally important, accepting the results if our candidate doesn’t win.

Susu Langlands lives in Lakeville.

The views expressed here are not necessarily those of The Lakeville Journal and The Journal does not support or oppose candidates for public office.

Latest News

Six die in Copake plan crash

COPAKE — A Mitsubishi MU-2B-40 plane carrying six people crashed in an open field near Two Town Road shortly after noon on Saturday, April 12, killing all aboard.

According to the National Transportation Safety Board, the aircraft departed from Westchester County Airport and was headed to Columbia County Airport in Hudson.

Keep ReadingShow less
Connecticut approves merger of Northwell, Nuvance health systems

Sharon Hospital

Archive photo

Connecticut’s Office of Health Strategy approved a merger between Northwell Health, a large New York-based health system, and Nuvance Health, which owns Danbury, Norwalk, Sharon and New Milford hospitals in Connecticut, as well as three hospitals in New York, according to a Tuesday announcement by the agency.

The two systems now have to complete the step of formally joining the entities together under the Northwell Health banner, a spokesperson for Nuvance Health said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Out of the mouths of Ukrainian babes

To escape the cruelties of war, Katya finds solace in her imagination in “Sunflower Field”.

Krista A. Briggs

‘I can sum up the last year in three words: fear, love, hope,” said Oleksandr Hranyk, a Ukrainian school director in Kharkiv, in a February 2023 interview with the Associated Press. Fast forward to 2025, and not much has changed in his homeland. Even young children in Ukraine are echoing these same sentiments, as illustrated in two short films screened at The Moviehouse in Millerton on April 5, “Once Upon a Time in Ukraine” and “Sunflower Field.”

“Sunflower Field,” an animated short from Ukrainian filmmaker Polina Buchak, begins with a young girl, Katya, who embroiders as her world becomes unstitched with the progression of the war. To cope, Katya retreats into a vivid fantasy world, shielding herself from the brutal realities surrounding her life, all while desperately wanting her family to remain intact as she awaits a phone call from her father, one that may never come.

Keep ReadingShow less
William F. Buckley Jr.: a legacy rooted in Sharon
Provided

Sam Tanenhaus, when speaking about William F. Buckley, Jr., said he was drawn to the man by the size of his personality, generosity and great temperament. That observation was among the reasons that led Tanenhaus to spend nearly 20 years working on his book, “Buckley: The Life and Revolution That Changed America,” which is due out in June. Buckley and his family had deep roots in Sharon, living in the house called Great Elm on South Main Street, which was built in 1812 and bought by Buckley’s father in 1923.

The author will give a talk on “The Buckleys of Sharon” at the Sharon Historical Society on Saturday, April 12, at 11 a.m. following the group’s annual meeting. The book has details on the family’s life in Sharon, which will, no doubt, be of interest to local residents.

Keep ReadingShow less