Latest News
Auto Repair
Blinds
Building/Remodeling
Floor Refinishing
Insulation
Landscaping
Landscaping
Lightning Rods
Moving
Overhead Doors
LAKEVILLE — Aron Ladanyi has been named as the winner of the 2024 Warren Prindle Visual Arts Scholarship.
Ladanyi, who lives in Lakeville and graduated this year from Housatonic Valley Regional High School (HVRHS), will use the $80,000 scholarship to attend Pratt Institute in New York where he plans to major in film.
The scholarship is disbursed in annual amounts of $20,000 over four years to the college or university of the student’s choice.
The scholarship was formerly known as the Contemporary Visual Arts Scholarship and was renamed in this, its twentieth year, in honor of Warren Prindle, an art teacher at HVRHS who retired this year after twenty-one years of teaching and mentoring students.
“A teacher who has really stood out to me as a mentor in the arts is Mr. Prindle, who since my freshman year of high school has supported me and pushed me to become a better artist. Without his advice and skill, I don’t think I could have gone this far in my creative career, let alone receive this scholarship.,” said Ladanyi.
“Untitled,” a work by Aron Ladanyi, 2024 winner of the Warren Prindle Visual Arts Scholarship and recent Housatonic Valley Regional High School graduate,who will major in Film at Pratt Institute in New York.Provided
Aron’s interest in art began at three when “I made my first ever work of art, that being a crudely drawn giraffe with an unreasonable amount of legs. Since then, I have always liked drawing, and once I discovered there was more to it than orange markers and printer paper, I really began to create and explore all sorts of art.”
He counts among his influence’s artists such as Matisse, Richard Misrach, Robert Bereny, William Klein, and Egon Schiele and “many more.” He added, “I am often inspired by music and my surroundings.”
Aron has a collection of old cameras which he uses in his work. Film is no longer made for them, so he spends time at flea markets looking through old boxes of cameras searching for film. “You can’t predict what will come out,” he said, “because the film is so old and may be damaged.”
“I am honored to have been selected as the recipient of the Warren Prindle Visual Arts Scholarship and am grateful to the foundation for choosing me out of all the applicants. The generosity of the scholarship is incredible, and it will help me astronomically in my time studying at the Pratt Institute and in my future career.”
The Foundation for Contemporary Arts, a nonprofit organization founded in 1963 by artist Jasper Johns, sponsors the scholarship. The scholarship winner is selected on the basis of talent and financial need and is awarded each year to a graduating HVRHS student.
Related Stories
Telecom Reg’s Best Kept On the Books
When Connecticut land-use commissions update their regulations, it seems like a no-brainer to jettison old telecommunications regulations adopted decades ago during a short-lived period when municipalities had authority to regulate second generation (2G) transmissions prior to the Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) being ordered by a state court in 2000 to regulate all cell tower infrastructure as “functionally equivalent” services.
It is far better to update those regs instead, especially for macro-towers given new technologies like small cells. Even though only ‘advisory’ to the CSC, the preferences of towns by law must be taken into consideration in CSC decision making. Detailed telecom regs – not just a general wish list -- are evidence that a town has put considerable thought into where they prefer such infrastructure be sited without prohibiting service that many – though not all – citizens want and that first responders rely on for public safety.
Such regs come in handy when egregious tower sites are proposed in sensitive areas, typically on private land. The regs are a town’s first line of defense, especially when cross referenced to plans of conservation and development, P&Z regulations, and wetlands setbacks. They identify how/where the town plans to intersect with the CSC process. They are also a roadmap for service providers regarding preferred sites and sometimes less neighborhood contention. In fact, to have no telecom regs can weaken a town’s rights to protect environmental, scenic, and historic assets, and serve up whole neighborhoods to unnecessary overlapping coverage and corporate overreach. Such regs are unique to every town and should not follow anyone else’s boiler plate, especially industry’s.
Connecticut is the only state that has a centralized siting entity for cell towers. The good news is that applicants must prove need for new tower sites in an evidentiary proceeding and any decisions have the weight of the state behind them. The bad news is that the CSC used to be far less industry-friendly and rote in their reviews, which now resemble a check list. There is an operative assumption at CSC that if an applicant wants a tower, they must need it, otherwise why spend significant money to run the approval gauntlet? This reflects a subtle shift over the years at CSC from sincere willingness to protect the environment toward minimal tweaking of bad applications with minor changes. The bottom line is that towns really cannot rely on the CSC to do all the work for them.
What CSC issues telecom providers is a “certificate of environmental compatibility” after an evidentiary proceeding (not unlike a court case) with intervenors, parties, expert witnesses, and the service provider’s technical pro’s sworn in and subject to cross examination. Service providers get to do the same with any opposition from intervenor/party participants – like towns and citizens -- and their experts. It’s an impressive process whose ultimate goal is the fine balancing between allowing adequate/reliable public services and protecting state ecology with minimal damage to scenic, historic, and recreational values. They unfortunately often fall short of their mandate – like approving cell towers with diesel generators over town aquifers -- evidenced by CSC only rejecting about five cell towers in the past 15-20 years.
The CSC was founded in 1972 and clarified its mission in the 1980’s to prevent the state from being carved up willy-nilly by gas pipelines, high tension corridors, and broadcast towers. With the sudden proliferation of cell towers beginning in late 1990’s, it became the most sued agency in Connecticut by both an arrogant upstart industry if applications were denied and by towns/citizens when bad sites were forced on them. CSC gradually formed a defensive posture that drives their decisions toward industry with deeper pockets and attorneys on retainer.
For citizens, nothing can wreck one’s day like the CSC. It behooves towns to protect what little toolkit they have, and understand the legal parameters of the CSC’s playing field. The CSC is not a “normal” government agency where municipal/citizen redress is based on logic and local support. Their process is largely immune to everything but specific kinds of evidence – like town regs with setbacks/fall zones, radio frequency transmission signal strengths, sensitive areas identified, and detailed wildlife inventory, among others.
There is a current cell tower fight involving two intervening towns -- Washington and Warren; both with good cell tower regs – over a tower site within 1200’ of a Montessori School, near Steep Rock’s nature preserves with comprehensive geology/wildlife databases that include endangered, threatened and special concern flora and fauna, on established federal/state migratory bird flyways, within throwing distance to a historic site capable of being listed on the Underground Railroad, and with an access road on a blind curve entering a state highway that will permanently damage wetlands, vernal pools, and core forests. There are well credentialed environmental experts, including Dr. Michael Klemens, former chair of Salisbury’s P&Z, as well as the former director of migratory bird management at the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and an RF engineer testifying to alternative approaches, plus three attorneys representing intervenors. It is the most professional challenge I have seen at CSC since Falls Village successfully mounted one that protected Robbins Swamps several years ago.
The hearing is ongoing, with uncertain results. To see what it takes today to stop an inappropriate tower siting, see Docket #543 under “Pending Matters” at https://portal.ct.gov/csc before removing local cell tower regs – the lowest hanging fruit that any town can possess in case it’s needed.
B, Blake Levitt is the Communications Director at The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council. She writes about how technology affects biology.